Bracing
Bracing
(OP)
Can you tell me when you would consider using bracing on say a platform supported on 4 legs. (no horizontal loads)
If the legs are short I suppose they are not needed and even if they were long and wouldn't buckle (according to cals) you wouldn't need braces ??
Is there a rule for fitting them
Thanks
Mick
If the legs are short I suppose they are not needed and even if they were long and wouldn't buckle (according to cals) you wouldn't need braces ??
Is there a rule for fitting them
Thanks
Mick






RE: Bracing
RE: Bracing
You may not need intermediate bracing for the columns, but the tops will want to be braced. Look at ASIC 360-05 for bracing requirements. Bracing requirements are in App. 6 of the spec (which is available for free download at www.ASIC.org).
RE: Bracing
DaveAtkins
RE: Bracing
Thanks
RE: Bracing
http
RE: Bracing
RE: Bracing
For short, small (no. of persons is limited by space), stocky platforms around machinery may be got away without braces, provides the legs and platform level support members are continuously welded, or with brackets.
However, the above is a judgement call. Other than that, you have to factor in human reaction with regarding to potential vibrations (induced by human & machines), which most designer chose to get away with by simply provide bracings, since it involves difficult & tedious analysis.
RE: Bracing
The brackets or continuous welds you mention essentially make a moment frame which acts as a lateral system to brace the columns.
I've never heard of bracing columns to help with vibrations.
RE: Bracing
RE: Bracing
Additionally, this is typically only done for mid-rise and/or high-rise buildings. It would likely be a mis-use of time and energy to do something like this for a 8'-10' high platform. Provide a real lateral system and it will be fine.
Finally, I'm not sure I believe that bracing columns (in between diaphragms, where the masses are lumped) will help with lateral "vibrations" anyway. The frequency of the structure is based on the stiffness of the lateral system and the mass (assuming the masses are lumped at each floor level) and is not appreciably affected by relative braces between floor. The modal shapes will follow the lumped masses, not intermediate braces between the masses (it may play a part in some of the higher mode shapes, but not the one(s) that we are typically concerned with).
RE: Bracing
We do not afraid of vibration (vibratory massager is quite enjoyable) but the movement induced by it, vertically & horizontally. With amber allowrance for compression, and no what-so-ever possibility for lateral load (except run-over by a vehicle), brace has no significant value but for human perceptions.
RE: Bracing
I'm going back to your first post and I think there is a disconnect here. Your first post talked about getting away with no bracing if the platform is stocky. I think that is not correct on its face because it is a stability problem (there is no lateral stability). You then talked about welding the frame or providing brackets (ostensibly to make a moment frame out of it). That is creating a a lateral system and essentrially bracing the columns (though you would need a k-factor if not using the DAM).
Once you have that lateral system in place there would be no need for intermediate column braces, just size them appropriately. Given this, and the fact that lateral motions are typically only considered for mid to high-rise construction, there would be no need to check this platform for lateral vibrations.
Am I missing something?
RE: Bracing
Please do not pick and chose my words. Read the whole sentence. With the conditions have been met, the welds and brackets further stabilize the platform that render the braces un-necessary.
A four leg platform essentially acting as a vertical cantilever with load (platform floor & workers) on tip if the top framing and the columns are simply connected. Once it is excited, it vibrates and the tip moves, the amplitude of the movement depends on the mode. A (diagonal) brace from lower ground to the tip will diminish the magnitude of the movement, but not the vibration, which would still be felt if it is in higher mode. However, human are not so afraid of the vibration without associated lateral displacement.
My previous conclusion, as it still stands now:
(analysis on human induced vibration), [b]which most designer chose to get away with by simply provide bracings, since it[b] (interactive vibration)[b]involves difficult & tedious analysis.[b]
RE: Bracing
RE: Bracing
RE: Bracing
Now (and in your 3rd post) you make mention of cantilevered columns. This is providing a lateral system, so I'm not sure of the distinction you are drawing between this and "bracing" the column. Just design the column for k=2 and be done with it. Additionally, if you brace the cantilevered column back to the base of an adjacent column you are essentially creating a braced frame which is infinitely more stiff than a cantilevered column and, as a result, will have a much higher frequency (and smaller amplitude).
A lateral vibration analysis of a cantilevered column is not that tedious. fn=((3EI/(ml^3))^0.5 where m is the mass at the top of the cant. I don't have time to run through the acceleration right now, but I'm sure won't take all day.
RE: Bracing
Wasn't that my intention - minimize the AMPLITUDE, should the vibration occues.
RE: Bracing
RE: Bracing
RE: Bracing
You are correct, agree with you.
RE: Bracing
Best regards,
BA
RE: Bracing
Like BA said, a platform with four posts, each hinged top and bottom, is unstable - i.e. it doesn't work on paper. This is what I was getting at.
What kslee was proposing was to provide a diagonal brace to help with lateral motions, but that the platform was fine if it were short and stocky enough. I was respectfully disagreeing and trying to state why. The reason is that without the brace the structure is unstable unless you can consider the columns to be cantilevered. If you can consider them cantilevered then design them accordingly and call it a day.
RE: Bracing
If you "heard" it on the internet, it's guilty until proven innocent. - DCS
http://www.eng-tips.com/supportus.cfm
RE: Bracing
For a simple platform that is not to tall a moment frame, or even a horizontal bracing system at the top of the platform will suffice.
RE: Bracing
RE: Bracing
No offence intended. Keep up the good work.
RE: Bracing
RE: Bracing
Basically it either needs to be braced, cantilvered or portalised (i.e. acting like a rigidly connected portal frame).
Most codes specify that the minimum lateral loads allowed for should be 1% of the vertical loads. This is to allow for any out of plumb in the columns which would tend to induce sway.
If you are in a seismic area then you also need to check the seismic loads.