×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Bracing

Bracing

(OP)
Can you tell me when you would consider using bracing on say a platform supported on 4 legs. (no horizontal loads)
If the legs are short I suppose they are not needed and even if they were long and wouldn't buckle (according to cals) you wouldn't need braces ??
Is there a rule for fitting them
Thanks
Mick

RE: Bracing

Slenderness ratio of legs. If >200, add bracing is a simple solution.

RE: Bracing

Even if there is no lateral loading, you still have to have some kind of bracing against lateral forces.  It will not be built perfectly plumb and level, it will not always have balanced loading on it, people walking on it create minimal lateral forces, unless the columns are all cantilevered (or moment connected to the beams) then they will be inherently unstable.

You may not need intermediate bracing for the columns, but the tops will want to be braced.  Look at ASIC 360-05 for bracing requirements.  Bracing requirements are in App. 6 of the spec (which is available for free download at www.ASIC.org).

RE: Bracing

I agree with StructuralEIT.  If you can justify the columns as cantilevers with fixed bases, then no bracing is required.  Otherwise, bracing is ALWAYS required--even when you think there will be no lateral loads.  It is a matter of stability.

DaveAtkins

RE: Bracing

(OP)
StructuralEIT, I can't see anyway of getting it free from that site. Can you give me a clue?
Thanks

RE: Bracing

Thanks for the link StructEIT

RE: Bracing

L17:

For short, small (no. of persons is limited by space), stocky platforms around machinery may be got away without braces, provides the legs and platform level support members are continuously welded, or with brackets.

However, the above is a judgement call. Other than that, you have to factor in human reaction with regarding to potential vibrations (induced by human & machines), which most designer chose to get away with by simply provide bracings, since it involves difficult & tedious analysis.  

RE: Bracing

kslee-

The brackets or continuous welds you mention essentially make a moment frame which acts as a lateral system to brace the columns.  

I've never heard of bracing columns to help with vibrations.

RE: Bracing

Vibration induced lateral movement. The brace can minimize the amplitude from the effect of shaking.

RE: Bracing

If it's not braced to something that is laterally stable, it won't matter.

Additionally, this is typically only done for mid-rise and/or high-rise buildings.  It would likely be a mis-use of time and energy to do something like this for a 8'-10' high platform.  Provide a real lateral system and it will be fine.  

Finally, I'm not sure I believe that bracing columns (in between diaphragms, where the masses are lumped) will help with lateral "vibrations" anyway.  The frequency of the structure is based on the stiffness of the lateral system and the mass (assuming the masses are lumped at each floor level) and is not appreciably affected by relative braces between floor.  The modal shapes will follow the lumped masses, not intermediate braces between the masses (it may play a part in some of the higher mode shapes, but not the one(s) that we are typically concerned with).

RE: Bracing

What is the characteristics of cantilever column subjects to vibration? Will the tip move, or the base? How a brace is usually connected - base to tip, base to base, tip to tip?

We do not afraid of vibration (vibratory massager is quite enjoyable) but the movement induced by it, vertically & horizontally. With amber allowrance for compression, and no what-so-ever possibility for lateral load (except run-over by a vehicle), brace has no significant value but for human perceptions.

RE: Bracing

I'm not sure I'm following your last post.  Only a nodal brace could help with lower mode shapes, I don't believe a relative brace will.  Columns are rarely braced at locations other than floors.   

I'm going back to your first post and I think there is a disconnect here.  Your first post talked about getting away with no bracing if the platform is stocky.  I think that is not correct on its face because it is a stability problem (there is no lateral stability).  You then talked about welding the frame or providing brackets (ostensibly to make a moment frame out of it).  That is creating a a lateral system and essentrially bracing the columns (though you would need a k-factor if not using the DAM).
Once you have that lateral system in place there would be no need for intermediate column braces, just size them appropriately.  Given this, and the fact that lateral motions are typically only considered for mid to high-rise construction, there would be no need to check this platform for lateral vibrations.

Am I missing something?

 

RE: Bracing

[b]For short, small (no. of persons is limited by space), stocky platforms[b] around machinery may be got away without braces,...

Please do not pick and chose my words. Read the whole sentence. With the conditions have been met, the welds and brackets further stabilize the platform that render the braces un-necessary.

A four leg platform essentially acting as a vertical cantilever with load (platform floor & workers) on tip if the top framing and the columns are simply connected. Once it is excited, it vibrates and the tip moves, the amplitude of the movement depends on the mode. A (diagonal) brace from lower ground to the tip will diminish the magnitude of the movement, but not the vibration, which would still be felt if it is in higher mode. However, human are not so afraid of the vibration without associated lateral displacement.

My previous conclusion, as it still stands now:
(analysis on human induced vibration), [b]which most designer chose to get away with by simply provide bracings, since it[b] (interactive vibration)[b]involves difficult & tedious analysis.[b]   

RE: Bracing

oops, the "BOLD" didn't work.

RE: Bracing

Forgot to mention, "short" meant "low", as opposed to "long" & "tall".

RE: Bracing

I did read the whole sentence.  The presence of machinery doesn't matter and neither does the degree of "stockiness".  At the end of the day the platform must be laterally stable.  This is not necessarily the same at column bracing, but can be.  The welds and brackets won't "further" stabilize the platform, they will provide the only stability for the platform.  Without bracing the structure back to something that is laterally stable (assuming it isn't welded or doesn't have brackets) it doesn't matter how short and stocky it is - no lateral resistance mean no lateral resistance.

Now (and in your 3rd post) you make mention of cantilevered columns.  This is providing a lateral system, so I'm not sure of the distinction you are drawing between this and "bracing" the column.  Just design the column for k=2 and be done with it.  Additionally, if you brace the cantilevered column back to the base of an adjacent column you are essentially creating a braced frame which is infinitely more stiff than a cantilevered column and, as a result, will have a much higher frequency (and smaller amplitude).  

A lateral vibration analysis of a cantilevered column is not that tedious.  fn=((3EI/(ml^3))^0.5 where m is the mass at the top of the cant.  I don't have time to run through the acceleration right now, but I'm sure won't take all day.  

 

RE: Bracing

"Additionally, if you brace the cantilevered column back to the base of an adjacent column you are essentially creating a braced frame which is infinitely more stiff than a cantilevered column and, as a result, will have a much higher frequency (and smaller amplitude)."

Wasn't that my intention - minimize the AMPLITUDE, should the vibration occues.   
 

RE: Bracing

But it's not a necessary part of the analysis or the question.  Just provide a lateral system and be done with it.

RE: Bracing

Guys, I respect your replies and based on previous posts you are both very knowledgeable. Do not allow this back and forth to lose sight of the question or become personal. Perhaps the originator could have given more info or loads, but I would tend to say that bracing is usually an inexpensive insurance policy in a case like this.

RE: Bracing

beton1:

You are correct, agree with you.

RE: Bracing

A platform supported on four columns, each hinged top and bottom, is a mechanism.  It will collapse with or without horizontal load.  

Best regards,

BA

RE: Bracing

I'm not getting personal, I just think there is a major disconnect somewhere.

Like BA said, a platform with four posts, each hinged top and bottom, is unstable - i.e. it doesn't work on paper.  This is what I was getting at.

What kslee was proposing was to provide a diagonal brace to help with lateral motions, but that the platform was fine if it were short and stocky enough.  I was respectfully disagreeing and trying to state why.  The reason is that without the brace the structure is unstable unless you can consider the columns to be cantilevered.  If you can consider them cantilevered then design them accordingly and call it a day.

RE: Bracing

Actually, StructuralEIT, it does work on paper - it just doesn't work in reality! smile


If you "heard" it on the internet, it's guilty until proven innocent. - DCS

http://www.eng-tips.com/supportus.cfm

RE: Bracing

I work for a firm that designs cogeneration facilities. We have this discussion concerning bracing for equipment supports all the time. A braced frame is stiffer than a moment resistant frame, hence it provides a higher frequency of response. There is often a frquency criteria associated with equipment supports and we have found that bracing the column legs we help us meet this criteria. Mt personal belief is that moment frames should be avoided for equipment supports.

For a simple platform that is not to tall a moment frame, or even a horizontal bracing system at the top of the platform will suffice.   

RE: Bracing

This seemed to be a platform for workers, not equipment.  I agree with you, though, that if it is for equipment then the frequency (and dynamic characteristics) of the platform is important.

RE: Bracing

StructuralEIT:
No offence intended. Keep up the good work.

RE: Bracing

(OP)
Thanks for all the input. it was just a general question from "not a structural Engineer"  about a frame supporting a lump of something.  

RE: Bracing

L17Aurora,

Basically it either needs to be braced, cantilvered or portalised (i.e. acting like a rigidly connected portal frame).

Most codes specify that the minimum lateral loads allowed for should be 1% of the vertical loads. This is to allow for any out of plumb in the columns which would tend to induce sway.

If you are in a seismic area then you also need to check the seismic loads.

 

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources