×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Surface Coatings for Concrete and Failures
4

Surface Coatings for Concrete and Failures

Surface Coatings for Concrete and Failures

(OP)
Has anyone come up with a surface coating on concrete that doesn't fail under forklift traffic.  Moisture gradient (from vapor transmission through the slab) can casue coatings to form blisters that eventually fail. Epoxy coatings tend to crack at the microscopic level.

Has anyone tried fiberglass reinforced sheets anchored to the floor?  The thermal expansion coefficient should be pretty close to concrete.

 

RE: Surface Coatings for Concrete and Failures

Have not heard of this application; strengthening members yes. Forklift traffic is a problem with concrete floors, however the problem is broad in nature. Subgrade and base preparation, proper techniques, detailing etc. are all part of the overall system performance. It is difficult to solve the issue strictly from a 'top-down' approach.  

RE: Surface Coatings for Concrete and Failures

2
beton1....the problem is not structural.  It is one of surface durability.

WoodyPE...in Cain's article he makes some nice, safe, theoretical recommendations; but in general, they are not practical to implement.  While I agree that a water-cement ratio of 0.45 would help tremendously, you're not likely to get that with typical warehouse slab construction.

Many will blame the issue on groundwater and water vapor migrating through the soil, into the concrete, then onto the surface.  That's not the way it happens.

Moisture vapor on the surface of the concrete in floor slabs is more likely to come from excessive mix water than any other source.  If not given adequate time and ambient conditions to evaporate, it can be a problem for many years.

What to use?  It depends on the amount of moisture vapor transmission and/or the ambient in-situ relative humidity in the concrete.

If you have not already done so, you need to do several tests.  The first is the typical anhydrous calcium chloride test for moisture vapor transmission (ASTM F1869).  The second test is to determine the in-situ relative humidity of the floor slab, and do this on a gradient basis to determine the humidity with depth.  This is ASTM F2170.  Once you have determined these two parameters, then you can decide which system to use or if you will need to apply a sealer or use other mitigation methods before you coat the floor.

We have used epoxies, methacrylates, urethanes, and acrylics with success but under different conditions.  Each has its limitations.  I was surprised at your statement of microcracking in the epoxy.  That's very unusual. Unless you have seen that first hand, I would be skeptical.  I do a lot of microscopy on concrete and floor coverings.  That is extremely rare and not inherent to epoxy coatings in general.  They are usually the more durable of the coatings.

Fiberglass sheets mounted to the floor would not likely work.  First they would have to have a slip resistant coating on them.  Second, the wheel stresses at the bottom of the unbonded fiberglass layer are going to be very high and will likely cause fatigue failure of the sheets, particularly in wheel paths and at joints.

Timing of application, ambient humidity and temperature, ventilation, and experience of the applicator certainly play significant roles in the success of any coating.

Don't forget to check the surface finish of the concrete itself.  Very hard troweled surfaces can cause problems with coating adhesion (which can lead to blistering) and might need to be roughened before application.  That can be done chemically or through abrasive blasting.
 

RE: Surface Coatings for Concrete and Failures

(OP)
Thank you Ron, et al.

First of all it is very easy to apply a long-lasting slip-proof surface on FRP, as it readily accepts many types of adhesives and resins for bonding purposes.

Secondly, FRP is used as a ground-mat for heavy equipment. It is also used as humvie armor, and on highway bridge decks.  A 3/4 inch plate is almost impervious to bullet penetration.  AS tough as it is, should forklift traffic be a problem?

Check out the technology.  It has come such a long way:

http://www.martinmarietta.com/Products/composites.asp

http://www.martinmarietta.com/Products/blastpanels.asp

http://www.martinmarietta.com/Products/roadtraks.asp

http://www.martinmarietta.com/Products/transonite.asp

http://www.mdacomposites.org/mda/frp_product_gateway.htm








 

RE: Surface Coatings for Concrete and Failures

No question it's tough stuff, but is it affordable and practical for use on warehouse floors.

The contact stress on a thin membrane over a stiff matrix such as concrete due to a forklift is very high...higher than the loading that would be placed on the membrane by a tracked vehicle.  I'm fairly sure you would see fatigue issues with the material if unbonded.

I agree that a non-slip surfacing could be added, but that's additional cost as well.

I think FRP is a great product in many applications...I'm just not sure this is an appropriate application, from a cost standpoint and a practicality standpoint.

 

RE: Surface Coatings for Concrete and Failures

Agree with you Ron; your second post is more in line with my thinking as well. What I was trying to say originally, is there are many factors (and different material coating applications as you note) and there is no miracle product.
We have done numerous repairs, but have often qualified this with the owner: it may be a recurring problem that will be likely need to be addressed again, especially with forklift traffic. It all depends on money owners wish to spend, be that originally for new construction or rehab work, and extent of repairs. The long term is often neglected by owners with fixed budgets.

RE: Surface Coatings for Concrete and Failures

(OP)
Metal tractors from earth-moving equipment has metal protrusions that forklifts don't have.  It eats up asphalt pavement in just one pass.  But FRP can take it.

Did you see the aircraft hangers with FRP flooring?

I have no faith in surface coatings. Sometimes I see cracks in epoxy coatings not long after they are poured.  We've used novolac, urethane, various epoxies, various preps.  None of it works.

We've used acid brick but that is even more expensive than FRP.  It can last 30 years or more, but it's really hard to service.

As for fatigue on an FRP panel, if it happens then replace the panel.  The panels would be anchored to the floor and sealed around the edges. The underside of the panels could be vented to a common pipe.  This could be slightly pressurized to check for leaks.

RE: Surface Coatings for Concrete and Failures

I'm surprised that you have not had success with epoxy coatings. That has not been our experience.

As for the cracks you see in the epoxy, please describe or attach a photo.  I'm interested in the cause.

RE: Surface Coatings for Concrete and Failures

(OP)
We have a lead acid battery plant, and our forklifts weigh 12K lbs including the load.

We have plants around the world, and they all have the same experience -- epoxy resin fails.  If you get 6 years out of it you are doing good.

One plant gave the floor coating specialist everything they wanted -- ployethelene before the concrete was poured, a 30 day cure, moisture checks, the whole nine yards.  The floor coater got to decide when to do it.  Their floor failed in 5 years.  Some might say they didn't know what they were doing, but that's all they do and they are a chain franchise.

As for the cracks in the expoxy -- it happens more with the faster curing types.  A 24 hour cure seems to do better.  
After a couple of years, blisters start becoming visible and they grow until they break. I don't know of anyone that really wants epoxy flooring in our industry compared to acid brick.

No coating is going to expand the same as concrete, and it is not very flexible, hence it will form cracks over time, especially with forklift traffic riding over it. I can break epoxy with my fingers.

As I said before -- I have no faith on floor coatings -- they are destined to fail because concrete needs to breathe.
 

RE: Surface Coatings for Concrete and Failures

2
Here are a few thoughts I would consider:

1.    Is this floor already constructed?  If so, before you can put any type of new coating on it, the existing floor must be prepared by removal of any existing coating and/or cure-sealer put on at the time of construction.  This can be done by shot blasting, acid-etching, or grinding the existing surface coating off.  I've been involved in all three and there are pros and cons to each and one of the biggest problems is how to legally dispose of the residue.

2.    If this floor is already constructed, is there a vapor barrier under it?  Ron mentioned, aside from vapor transmission from the subgrade (if there is no vapor barrier), evaporation / transmission of excess mixing water can take months to level off – that's the reason for pouring slabs-on-grade with as low a mixing water content as possible.

3.    Regarding the reinforced fiberglass sheets, I've never seen this done.  Perhaps one of the manufacturers can fill you in and SHOW you some successful projects. BUT, I sure wouldn't want to be the guinea pig for something like this.  No matter what you do to a floor like this, you own it.  

4.    The other option, if you have your heart set on trying it, is to do a trial area that covers both storage and isle-way floors, maybe a 6' wide x 10' long patch and monitor it for 6-12 months to see how it holds up under traffic.

5.    We had our best luck with warehouse floors by wet-curing the floor for 7 days, let it sit for 30 days, then acid washing it with a riding floor scrubber, water rinsing it, then applying a water soluble fluorosilicate liquid hardener.  There is no smell, you can get on the floor the next day and the floor does not dust.  Another feature is that fork truck tires don't leave black marks as easily as the high solids cure-n-sealers do.

6.    There are still lots of heated arguments about whether to use a vapor barrier under new floor slabs, I still recommend them.  After the floor is cured and mixing water evaporated (hopefully without curing the slab), the vapor barrier starts its' useful life by preventing vapor transmission from the subgrade.   If you ever want to put a new coating on the floor, you'll be glad you have a vapor barrier under it.
 

RE: Surface Coatings for Concrete and Failures

Have you tried steel fibers in the concrete?  They improve the toughness of the surface.  Our coal mine clients insist on steel fiber floors in their workshops, but that is primarily for maintenance of D11's, etc, not big forklifts.  If this is a recurring problem, maybe you need to look at a different type forklift, one with pneumatic tyres.

RE: Surface Coatings for Concrete and Failures

jheidt and hokie bring up excellent points.  A fluosilicate hardener is a good idea.  In fact, looking at one of your link photos of the FRP manufacturing plant, it looks like that's what they used.

I assume you have an ambient chemical influence on your floor coatings.  This could be a cause for early failure.  I also see your need to protect the concrete from acid, so a fluosilicate might not be the answer in your case, but should still be considered if the ambient conditions can be worked out.

No coating will last forever in an industrial environment.  If you are getting 5 years of good performance from a coating in an aggressive environment with heavy use as you've noted, consider that to be fairly good, remove the residual coating every 5 years and recoat.

I also disagree with your statement that coatings are destined to fail because concrete needs to breath.  Concrete can do just fine with coating and the coatings can perform for their applications if matched to the conditions.

RE: Surface Coatings for Concrete and Failures

(OP)
Our concrete floors are pre-existing, but as I already said, we gave our floor coating expert everything he wanted in a brand new facility with concrete poured from scratch on top of polyethelene, and it failed just like everything else.  He was there every step of the way, and was given all the waiting time he wanted before applying the coating. It failed anyway in only 5 years just like all the other plants - then the blame game.

I haven't seen a concrete floor anywhere in an industrial or commercial application that doesn't get cracks in it.  
  In my opinion it is destined to fail over time.  You can disagree all you want, but I have never seen what I would call a successful floar coating anywhere regardless of environment.  They eventually pit, and the floor cracks too -- just give it time. Maybe somebody here can do better, but given all the failures, what is one success worth?

Acid etching has been tried and we in plant engineering do not think it is a good idea.  For starters, acid and concrete are a real bad combination.  We've seen enough of it to know.

I have other plant engineers that agree.  I can show you five different plants where the same thing happens.  In five years a floor coating is a goner -- take your pick on the type.  At least we can get 30 or more years out of acid brick though it costs at least $65 per square foot.

 
 

RE: Surface Coatings for Concrete and Failures

WoodyPE:

Are you talking a WAREHOUSE FLOOR or a PRODUCTION FLOOR?  I've been on a number of food plant projects where acid resistant floor brick are used with an epoxy grout.  They stand up pretty well, but nothing lasts for ever.  The dairy plants I've been in do replace their floors every 10 years or so as part of a regular maintenance program and that's due to the lactic acid deterioration from MILK!  

Foundries and heavy industrial floors are a different problem, where thick shake on floor hardeners are required.  But these places take a beating and floor replacement in heavily used (abused) areas is normal.

A warehouse floor is different.  You should be able to construct one that is useable for a much longer period of time.  As far as concrete floors cracking, if you are willing to pay the price, use an expansive cement and a higher reinforcing ratio.  A WAREHOUSE built in the 1980's with "Chem-Comp" cement and #4 rebar @ 16" o.c. each way is till in good condition with no expansion joints, no control joints and no column boxouts. The only problems they have is where the forktruck drivers hit the storage racks and pull the racking anchor bolts out of the floor.

As far as coatings go, sometimes the new ones aren't as good as the old time tested ones.  UPS specs tounge oil for their Transfer Station floors with a hard burned in troweled finish, they get a lot of wear and stand up very well.

RE: Surface Coatings for Concrete and Failures

(OP)
P.S. Ron,

Regarding concrete, I'm sure you can do what others have not in our plant floor coating experiences.  Some of our "field experts" weren't much better than the average concrete contracter. On the otherhand, I've met some very respectable experts here at the TIPS forum.

Regardless of how good your solution is, however, the typical concrete laborer and floor coater around here are mexicans that can't speak english.  There are a few good concrete contractors around and there are more that are not so good.

RE: Surface Coatings for Concrete and Failures

WoodyPE;

You do make a good point about the quality of the concrete crew. In years past, the union training programs produced some very good tradesmen - cement finishers and construction laborers.  Those quality tradesmen are getting to retirement age and they are not being replaced very fast.

RE: Surface Coatings for Concrete and Failures

(OP)
"A warehouse floor is different.  You should be able to construct one that is useable for a much longer period of time.  As far as concrete floors cracking, if you are willing to pay the price, use an expansive cement and a higher reinforcing ratio.  A WAREHOUSE built in the 1980's with "Chem-Comp" cement and #4 rebar @ 16" o.c. each way is till in good condition with no expansion joints, no control joints and no column boxouts. The only problems they have is where the forktruck drivers hit the storage racks and pull the racking anchor bolts out of the floor."

I'm sure you've had the success, and I'm glad to hear someone wins for a change.  On the otherhand, our contactors don't seem to have the control needed to get the right results.  We are almost always dealing with a pre-existing concrete floor in our industrial application and everyone is pushed for time to get it up and running.  after re-reading the posts, I suspect this a significant part of our problems -- nobody has the time to do it right, and the operating folks want the floor yesterday.
 

RE: Surface Coatings for Concrete and Failures

WoodyPE...don't get me wrong. Coatings on concrete floors do not happen easily.  You are right to be skeptical, but also from some of your comments, I think you've been given some bad information along the way.

The best floor slabs on grade are those that have properly designed and controlled concrete mixes, coupled with proper control jointing, finished properly, then cured properly.  As long as concrete has been around, it remains a mystery to many contractors....even those who place it daily.  I see so many examples of poor concrete placement by very experienced concrete subcontractors it isn't even funny.  

Your application presents an aggressive environment in at least two respects.  First, there's the forklift traffic.  Assuming you are using solid tire forklifts, you have to be concerned about the abrasion on the surface as well as making sure the surface is not too slippery.  Further, the contact stresses are high, so the potential for surface damage is high as well. A poor finish will soon appear from that type of repetitive stress.  Secondly, you have the issue of an aggressive chemical environment.  You're right...acid and concrete do not generally mix well.

You actually have more options than you might think.  I realize you are limited in the skilled workforce area and the competence of the contractors, but some tight control during construction by a capable engineer with concrete materials experience and coating experience will get you a long way toward the performance you want.  There are numerous coatings that are or can be formulated for acid resistance, abrasion resistance, and bonding.....certainly for less than $65/sf, even if they only last for 10 years or so.

Your application is probably worse than most, so make sure that whatever route you choose, it is one that is proven in a similar condition.

Good luck.

RE: Surface Coatings for Concrete and Failures

So many experts here, really don't want to expose my ignorance on this subject, and the arguments around it.
However, I couldn't stop to think and ask: What is the definition of "failure of a driving/walking surface"?

In Chicago, it's pot holes on pavement, or chunk of concrete splitted and set unevenly on sidewalks. Both create hazardous conditions for the end users. How's the crack on my basement floor, well, I don't like seeing them day-in day-out, but it stayed there for more than several decades, and the floor is still serving. The same logic applies to many other environments that having concrete flooring.

I think my point is: as an engineer, we try to deliver the best solution within the budget. From there on, the owner, and the user shall understand there is nothing wrong with a few surface cracks, if there is no causes other than the nature of the paving material, and it is still in serving shape (no tripping/slipping). But if insisted upon to remediate, run a cost-effective study, let the owner makes the decision on $$$, then go for it, with someone in mind that you can plant the blames later on for a new, unproven product.

RE: Surface Coatings for Concrete and Failures

cost-effectiveness-reliability

RE: Surface Coatings for Concrete and Failures

Ron makes many good points.  I would only add that when you are looking for concrete floor coatings; stay with the major manufacturers; have their field rep at the site for the first day or two; have a pre-installation meeting with all parties (including field foreman) and follow manufacturers' recommendations religiously.

RE: Surface Coatings for Concrete and Failures

Hope I didn't miss anything about FiberPlate, couldn't find any information on application as wearing surface for traffic load, but bi-directional strength, resistance to burn, chemical & corrosion...etc.  

RE: Surface Coatings for Concrete and Failures

WoodyPE...I took a look at it.  No direct application experience to your needs.  As jheidt said before...if you want to do this, try an area, not a whole floor.  See how it works.

Ron

RE: Surface Coatings for Concrete and Failures

I am not familiar with it.  If the company recommends it for your application, they should be able to show you a similar plant where it has been used.

RE: Surface Coatings for Concrete and Failures

WoodyPE...the physical properties are about what you would expect from a reinforced epoxy or FRP. Unfortunately, they don't address the stress mode that a forklift will impose on the sheets.  

When you have an unbonded interface like the sheets over concrete, there is little or no load sharing.  When you have a load applied to the concrete surface it will spread at approximately a 30 to 45 degree angle downward.  When you apply the same load to the FRP sheets, the thickness is so little it just transposes to a shear load and a crushing (compressive) load.

RE: Surface Coatings for Concrete and Failures

(OP)
ok I signed up for the Strongco Design Manual and these are the material properties for the Extren FRP Plate:

Series 500/525:

Ultimate stress at 100 F = 85%
Tensile Stress LW = 30,000 psi
Tensile Stress CW = 7,000 psi
Compressive Stress LW = 30,000 psi
Compressive Stress CW = 15,000 psi
Thermal Expansion Coefficient = 7 x 10-6 in/in/F

at a 45 degree shear angle this seems it would take the load pretty well.  Ron? anybody?



  

RE: Surface Coatings for Concrete and Failures

WoodyPE....as you can see from the data, the material has a linear orientation.  In the "machine direction (LW)", the ultimate tensile is over 4 times higher than in the "cross machine direction (CW)".  The lower value prevails as the load will hit the sheets in all directions. Under concentrated, repetitive, rolling loads this will tend to cause the sheets to split in the longitudinal direction.

If I get a chance today, I'll run an elastic layer analysis on the material and a single wheel load to see what the stress in the bottom of the sheet would be.

RE: Surface Coatings for Concrete and Failures

(OP)
thanks Ron.  It's been a long time since I thought about Mohr's circle.

Here's some additional stress data on the Extren Series 500/525 material

ASTM D790:

Flexural Stress LW = 30,000 psi
Flexural Stress CW = 10,000 psi

ASTM D695 was used for the compressive stress test.
ASTM D638 was used for the tensile stress test.

It appears the directionality of the fiber material is going to cause issues.  Perhaps I should consider Fiberplate instead because it uses woven fabric.

I've been trying to contact their engineering department.

RE: Surface Coatings for Concrete and Failures

(OP)
PS: I forgot to mention the stress on the plate will also depend on the flatness of the underlying floor.

RE: Surface Coatings for Concrete and Failures

Thus far I have seen anyone mention resistance to abrasion on cyclic load, and slip resistance, any thought? Also, I think distorsion could be an important factor when the wheel turns in direction.

RE: Surface Coatings for Concrete and Failures

I don't know what the respective Young's modulii are, but with forklift traffic, this would have a significant effect on the 'shearing' of the mat material.  This would likely have a bigger impact on the longevity than the compressive strength.  A 'layered' analysis, as Ron suggested, would likely be meaningful and the results might be a bit surprising.

I'm really surprised that there have been problems using an epoxy or a polyurethane material.

Dik

RE: Surface Coatings for Concrete and Failures

(OP)
Slip resistance is not an issue.  The material surface exceeds safety requirements, and an aluminum oxide compound is the preferred surface coating for forklift traffic.

RE: Surface Coatings for Concrete and Failures

dik..you and I are thinking along the same lines...the shear stress caused by the shear wave forward of the rolling tire will be high.  Since the sheets are not bonded to the concrete, the flexural rippling and shear will likely tear the sheets, particularly in the cross machine direction.

I hope to have some time this afternoon to run the elastic layer analysis.  The whole thing has gotten interesting so I don't mind spending a little time on it.

Don't tell my wife it's not billable!!

RE: Surface Coatings for Concrete and Failures

Due to the difference in stiffness... I'm not all that sure it matters if it is bonded to the concrete... this will improve it, but I'm not sure how much.

Again... I'm surprised this method works and using the polyurethane, etc. doesn't... can't wrap my ears around it yet.

Dik

RE: Surface Coatings for Concrete and Failures

Me either....Our experience with urethanes and epoxies has been significantly better than Woody's.  He has a harsh environment, no doubt, but I'm surprised by their lack of success with epoxies.

RE: Surface Coatings for Concrete and Failures

What do you all think about a cement topping with metallic aggregate such as BASF Anviltop 300.  It's made specifically for situations like this and can be applied as a topping to fully cured concrete.

I've used it at several extreme duty locations.  No complaints yet.

RE: Surface Coatings for Concrete and Failures

(OP)
I have probably a hundred or more pictures from various plants like those I posted.

RE: Surface Coatings for Concrete and Failures

(OP)
I spoke to an applications engineer regarding Fiberplate, and the 1/4 inch thick Fiberplate will take forklift traffic.  They make it up to 3/4 inch thick.  It is not pulltruded like SAFPLATE.  It is 60% resin and 40% woven glass mat that is equally strong in all directions.

They recently installed a Fiberplate floor in a chemical storage warehouse located in California after a large EPA spill event required remediation.  It takes a lot of forklift traffic.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources