×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Assembly Drawings vs MPI's

Assembly Drawings vs MPI's

Assembly Drawings vs MPI's

(OP)
The company I currently work for has been doing fully exploded assembly drawings for years. All assembly information is contained in the drawing.  At my previous job it was detailed MPI's with lots of pictures and NO assembly drawings.  Other engineers I know do mostly assembly drawings that are not exploded, assembly shown complete from different views with some cross section views.

What does your company do?
1) Fully exploded assembly drawings.
2) Picture based Manufacturing Process Instructions.
3) Unexploded assembly drawings.

RE: Assembly Drawings vs MPI's

Mainly unexploded assy drawings, but exploded where needed, cross-sections and details to suit.

Photo's or CAD images used only in manuals.

RE: Assembly Drawings vs MPI's

I do exploded assemblies with a BOM. These are for the shop (one guy) to know what parts to make as designated by the engineer (one guy) Parts are detailed with only one sheet, but he can look at the parts with eDrawings.
YMMV

--
Hardie "Crashj" Johnson
SW 2009 SP 2.1
Nvidia Quadro FX 1000
AMD Athalon 1.8 GHz 2 Gig RAM

 

RE: Assembly Drawings vs MPI's

We use both orthogonal views (front, right, top or most descriptive views) and exploded views on the same drawing if possible.  This helps the shop in differentiating parts and sub-assemblies quicker.  Sometimes we use the exploded view on assembly instruction sheets so the customers of our clients can assemble the product.

The industry you are in may dictate how you make your assembly drawings.   

Flores

RE: Assembly Drawings vs MPI's

I'm old school and like the "Unexploded assembly drawings", but our company uses "Fully exploded assembly drawings" and can't stand it. I takes way more time to detail a drawing, and could possibly miss something in your design like a screw bottoming out in a blind tapped hole. Full cross sections tells the whole story about your design. Fully exploded looks really cool, but I believe it's for non-technical folks who are building bookcases from WalMart  

Colin Fitzpatrick (aka Macduff)
Mechanical Designer
Solidworks 2008 SP 4.0
Dell 490 XP Pro SP 2
Xeon CPU 3.00 GHz 3.00 GB of RAM
nVida Quadro FX 3450 512 MB
3D Connexion-SpaceExplorer

RE: Assembly Drawings vs MPI's

I think it totally depends on your circumstances.

I have had the privelege of working in two different companies with quite different production methodology.

1) Plastic parts assembled into complex sub assemblies in reasonable quantities with jigs etc to help, and semi-skilled labour

In this situation work instructions of pictures and words is critical for assembly.  The relationships between parts, tolerances, and fits has all been created in the design phase and checked in pre-production.  Defining drawings are created for parts, but these are used for tooling and checking (QA), not manufacturing.

2) Complex mechanical assemblies from fabricated parts, as one-offs with skilled labour

In this situation assembly drawings are used for fabricated parts, so that the final product dimensions and relationships are defined.  Exploded assemblies are used for dissassemblable assemblies of standard parts ie bearings and bushes.  Part drawings are created for standalone parts that fit into these assemblies.

You probably have to decide which of these situations suits you, or blend the two.

RE: Assembly Drawings vs MPI's

I tend to agree with macduff.

RE: Assembly Drawings vs MPI's

Exploded views for presentations.  Unexploded assembly drawings broken down into sub-assemblies for machining prints.

I always thought MPIs were for work instructions on assembly lines.  The only time I messed with those were in my manufacturing engineering days so I haven't had to make any in a while...thank goodness.

RE: Assembly Drawings vs MPI's

We have a two step process.  The design engineer creates an exploded view drawing, usually multiple pages showing the step by step assembly process as he/she envisions.  The manufacturing engineer references this when he/she creates the word and photo assembly instructions used on the line.  I know it does not make too much sense as a lot of work is duplicated except that some of our manufacturing facilities are in different countries and I am not going to translate.  Also the exploded view drawing is an official tracked document where the assembly floor words and pictures are not.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources