×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Deck-railing post connection
3

Deck-railing post connection

Deck-railing post connection

(OP)
I'm designing a deck with the following specs:

Height: > 30" above ground

Material: Western Red Cedar (No. 2)
Fb = 575 psi
Fv = 65 psi
Fc (perp) = 350 psi
Fc (parallel) = 825 psi
E = 1.1E6 psi

Joist size: 2x6

I need to come up with a detail for the deck-railing post connection that meets the load requirement in the IRC (R301.5) of 200 lbs.

I have looked at using a Simpson Strong-Tie HD2AHDG deck post connector, however this requires a 2x8 joist size.  I also looked at using a DeckLok bracket system.  I didn't see anything on their website (www.deck-lok.com) regarding joist size requirement (or type of wood).

Does anyone have any experience with the DeckLok brackets, or do you have any suggestions for a detail I could use for the post connection that will meet the code requirement?

Thanks for your help!
 

RE: Deck-railing post connection

If the deck is ~30" I would just extend all posts down to the ground.  Other choice is decrease post spacing.

RE: Deck-railing post connection

Set your posts on the outside band rather than onto the deck.  If you do this, you will only need to bolt the post through the outside band with 4 carriage bolts and you will develop the lateral resistance in the post.

Keep in mind that you are using a low strength wood.  It has low pull-through, pull-out, and flexural strength as compared to others.

RE: Deck-railing post connection

(OP)
Thanks for your replies!

PSlem - the deck is about 4' off the ground.  Part of the deck has an overhang (about 2' beyond the beam line), so extending the railing posts to the ground would not be an option on that side of the deck (the railing posts could be right next to the posts supporting the beam, depending on where the rail posts lined up).

Ron - by my calcs a 200 lb load at the top of a 36" railing post will result in a load at the rail attachment to the band joist of approximately 2000 lbs. It's my understanding that carriage bolts are typically used in nonstructural and minor structural applications - I don't think they would be able to handle that high of a load...
 

RE: Deck-railing post connection

CEmonkee...for a 4-bolt pattern, that works out to be 1000 lbs. per bolt from the force couple.  A 1/2" dia. carriage bolt will easily handle a 1000 lb. load. (that's 5000 psi on a 30+ ksi material.)

I'd be more concerned about the bending in the wood.

RE: Deck-railing post connection

Don't forget the connection of the joists to the trimming beam.  And also blocking with connections to take the load into the floor where the railing is parallel to the joists.

RE: Deck-railing post connection

What are the remaining deck dimensions?

I build (as a sideline) the steel posts and wrought iron rails for decks and stairs and interior raling, and anchoring the posts is ALWAYS a struggle.   Particularly at stairs where I cannot anchor around a corner as a lateral brace.

For this application, the "standard" OSHA 200 lbf sideways force is actually on the rail as a whole, not on just one post.   Your rails (the upper and middle rail) will transmit that 200 lbf load sideways to the post in question and two (at least!) adjacent posts IF the connecting rails are rigid.  You should NOT splice your horizontal rails do they DO carry that load, and each rail should be attached "firmly" to each post.  (The catalogs you have are great, use them with the screws provided - nails will work loose.  Bolts are better.  Carriage bolts works OK, but I prefer to use galv oversized washers under the carriage head, rather than let the bolthead sink into the wood.   They don't spin if carriage bolt and washer are both galvanized.)  

Two 1/2" galvanized bolts in each post are sufficient: this is an outdoors deck and you don't have a finicky homeowner who wants all of her bolts and welds and fasteners to be "invisible" and "never to rust"!   (That's "hard" - to say the least.)

Your deck boards extend a good distance away from your beams underneath.  

I'd run one 2x6 (or better yet two invisible) beams under the edge fastened to each deck board.  Then at each post, use a 3x3x1/4 angle thats cut two boards "long" to clamp the vertical post from underneath to the runner(s) under the deck board.  The post load then is supported by several deck boards, and prevented from twisting out by the bolt through the angle iron and the second bolts through the runner beam.

RE: Deck-railing post connection

racookpe....the 200 lb lateral load is to be applied anywhere along the rail, thus when applied at one post, the load is not shared by another post. If applied 1/2 way between two posts, yes, it is shared, but that's not what the code requires.

Further, there is a requirement for 50 lb/lf applied in any direction along the top rail.  For post spacings of 48 inches, it is the same as the 200 lb. lateral load.  If the spacing exceeds 48 inches, the load on the post goes up.

RE: Deck-railing post connection

Agree with Ron.

RE: Deck-railing post connection

If you had a continuous 2x6 cedar top rail, the section is 1.5(5.5)^2/6 = 7.56 so M = 7.56 x 575 = 4350 = PL/4 for L = 96", P = 181#. So a single post does not have to carry 200# alone.

RE: Deck-railing post connection

Thank you for the review.

RE: Deck-railing post connection

the 200# requirement is accounting the effect of person lean on the rail, the leaning force can be centered at one post, causees it to fail before others would catch on.  

RE: Deck-railing post connection

(OP)
Thanks everyone for your comments/suggestions.  Quick question - I have seen a max railing post spacing of 6' listed in some places.  Can anyone tell me where that requirement is specified in the IRC or IBC?

Thanks!

RE: Deck-railing post connection

I don't know of a limitation on spacing. It is dictated by the capacity of the system to resist the required loading.

RE: Deck-railing post connection

Great link, CTW.  Now the question is, how literally should we take the code requirement of 200# in any direction?  As pointed out in the article, if a tree falls onto the railing from the outside, the force is pushing inward.  The connection was not tested for that condition.

My vote is to forget about a force pushing inward as it is not likely to ever occur.  And if it does occur from a tree falling, 200# is nowhere near enough anyway.  

Best regards,

BA

RE: Deck-railing post connection

BAretired...I agree.  I analyze railings for two different manufacturing clients.  One of them actually only fastens (against my advice!)to resist outward load, since that is the critical one for railing.

The 200 lb requirement is a lateral load requirement.  The 50 lb/ft is to be applied in any direction.

RE: Deck-railing post connection

Ron:

I think the downward push (200#) on rails should also be considered. How often we see people sitting on the rail, and/or standing on the mid-rail to post for photo-op, and  to gain better views. This phenomenon is most prevalent in touring areas, parks, schools.... Any thoughts/advise on that?  

RE: Deck-railing post connection

Also, a word of friendly warning, pay extra attention to railing design whenever the area it encloses would have crowd gathering, especially college age kids. It's not rare to become a headline news in the papers.

RE: Deck-railing post connection

After said that, I agree it is too much to ask designers to come up solutions for those situations, however, we have at least to treat the code requirements as the absolute minimum, not the other way around.

RE: Deck-railing post connection

kslee1000...I agree and my apologies for misstating the code requirement.  It is:

A 200 lb. concentrated load applied at any point and in any direction, or

A 50 lb/ft distributed load applied in any direction.

They are not to be applied simultaneously, of course.

RE: Deck-railing post connection

If the posts are spaced at 4' centers, 50 plf on the rail amounts to 200# at the top of each post.  If it is applied in any direction, it must be applied inward as well as outward. In my opinion, that is not a reasonable requirement, but if it is, the connection shown in the link by CTW requires another holddown on the bottom of the joist.

 

Best regards,

BA

RE: Deck-railing post connection

Ron:

You started well, and concluded well also.

RE: Deck-railing post connection

The article posted by CTW certainly shows how to handle the situation where the post is on the end of a joist, but the researchers have ignored the case where the post is on the end of the deck.

RE: Deck-railing post connection

BA:

I think it is a good design that the post would not fail outward, but inward - a stop sign yells "don't come close !!!". nosmiley

RE: Deck-railing post connection

Not very rigid at all.  I think you would have to have blocking between the joists of the same depth as the joist.  Then use the connectors in the article posted by CTW from the post to the blocking.  Your detail puts all the moment into the deck.

RE: Deck-railing post connection

Concur with the mandatory blocking - The edge beams must be connected back to the "main" joist, unless they are in the areas where the original poster said they could attach to the (under deck) verticals.  

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources