×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Open Delta vs Wye Voltage Transformers
2

Open Delta vs Wye Voltage Transformers

Open Delta vs Wye Voltage Transformers

(OP)
I have noticed that on metering points, three single phase VT's connected in wye (usually) are used to ensure highest possible accuracy.

However, for protection issues, as inputs to relays requiring 3 phase voltage sources, oftentimes an open delta made up of two VT's is used, with the secondary "B" corner grounded (old Westinghouse standard I understand, to prevent dropping a generator on a secondary ground fault).

Can anyone provide the technical basis as to why this open delta is so popular?  Are there some instances when the 3 VT arrangement may be required for protection issues?

TIA
Ken Almon

RE: Open Delta vs Wye Voltage Transformers

Ken, we see this in Mississippi alot.  The only reason that I have ever really heard is more economic than technical.  The utility is able to serve the facility or building with two transformers in lieu of three.  The problem with this arrangement is that the single phase load can only be shared between two phases in lieu of three with a conventional arrangement.  This can make for an unbalanced system if you are not careful.

Joe Legge

RE: Open Delta vs Wye Voltage Transformers

Joe is correct. The only advantage (perceived) is economic. Currently, it is sometimes actually more expensive to use 2 x 2-bushing VTs instead of 3 x 1-bushing VTs, especially at system voltages of 46 kV and above (normally 2-bushing VTs are only available up to 69 kV).

The change in economics is mainly based on supply and market conditions. There are not too many folks who make 2-bushing VTs above 34.5 kV (because most folks use 3 - L-G connected units) and hence not as much competition.

RE: Open Delta vs Wye Voltage Transformers

Please correct me if I am wrong, but I believe you need three wye-connected VTs to implement directional metering or overcurrent protection.  I don't think you can do this with two open-delta connected VTs.

RE: Open Delta vs Wye Voltage Transformers

You need 3 wye-wye VTs for directional ground fault relays (or perhaps wye-open corner (broken) delta for electromechanical ground directional relays).  
Phase fault direction is sensed phase-phase and open delta VT connection is fine for this.  For example, when a distance relay is used for generator phase backup protection it is connected to the generator open delta VTs, so is the reverse power protection.

RE: Open Delta vs Wye Voltage Transformers

Thanks for clarifying, peter.

RE: Open Delta vs Wye Voltage Transformers

My experience is mainly with VTs in substation application and not so much on the generator side. My understanding is that peterb is correct about the generator protection applications. I do know that L-L connected VTs are quote common on generator-side applications.

In substation applications it is not very common to apply 2 VTs in open-delta, especially for metering applications.

RE: Open Delta vs Wye Voltage Transformers

Scottf -
I think that you're absolutely correct when dealing with outdoor substations.  In my experience, the open delta arrangement is common in metalclad switchgear, whether feeding generation or industrial plant systems.  
As my background is heavier on relaying rather than metering, I'll be guided by your experience there.

RE: Open Delta vs Wye Voltage Transformers

To add to good comments already—  For metering, Blondel’s Theorem must be satisfied for all modes of system operation—load unbalance, grounding resistor dissipation or faults.  Simply, if there is any connection (resistor, reactor or solid) to the XO busing of the serving transformer, then Grounded-Wye—Grounded-Wye PTs are in order.  

C57.13 VT groups should be carefully understood, and It may be necessary that other than group 1 ratings be applied.  Overvoltages from neutral shift during faults may dictate review of BIL ratings and fuse ratings, also.  Nowadays, the cost and availability of 3-element metering should, in most all cases, obviate anything less.  If there is likelihood of temporary system reconfiguration deengergizing PTs when remote or optical polling {or a readable display} is needed, auxiliary-power capability and consideration for a reliable source should be reviewed.  
  
For relaying, if zero-sequence quantities are needed, Grounded-Wye—Grounded-Wye is the ticket.  Thin specifications will just about guarantee open-delta PTs.  The “secondary ‘B’ corner grounded” arrangement is not unique to Westinghouse.  
  

RE: Open Delta vs Wye Voltage Transformers

Suggestion: Traditionally, 2-CT and 2-VT approach to metering (kWh) is adequately applied to the 3-phase and 3-wire power supply system (Aaron's Connection of Watthourmeters). The 3-CT and 3-VT approach to metering (kWh) is mandatorily applied to 3-phase, 4-wire system power supply system.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources