×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Material Identification

Material Identification

Material Identification

(OP)
Hi there guys,

This is my first post so i would like to say thanks for the extensive information available on these forums. its really interesting.

Now, I normally liike to run searches for answers but in this instance I have something quite specific I need to find out. I have an element breakdown of a flange I tested on a 9 chrome line. The flange should have been 9 chrome but the Niton Gun gave me the reading below.

Mo 0.41%
Nb 0.02%
Ni 4.92%
Co 16.68
Fe 62.53%
Mn 13.84%
Cr 0.98%
V 0.22%
Ti 0.08%

I have not come across this before. I normally see, Carbon, Stainless and Chrome on the lines that I work on.

Thanks for your time and any input is appreciated.

Regards
Bob

 

RE: Material Identification

How did you prepare the surface for testing? All surface oxide, oil, etc., must be removed by light surface grinding for best results.

RE: Material Identification

(OP)
Yes, all pmi procedures are carried out correctly. the surface was clean and free from contamination (as good as any other surface prep).

Contaminatation was the first thing that came to mind so i prep'd the surface even more and retested.

Cheers

RE: Material Identification

Well, before I would finally decide there is a material nonconformance I would go the next step and remove a small piece off of the end of the flange and have it tested in the lab.

RE: Material Identification

(OP)
Unfortunately that's not my decision to make. What would normally happen in this instance is that the Flange will be replaced during the next TA. If, conventional NDT methods show that it is not highly corroded.

I'll go ahead and report this as a no match with the chemical analysis for the area inspector to evaluate.

Thanks for your input

RE: Material Identification

If this part is supposed to be 9Cr you have cause to have it removed.
This chemistry look austenitic, so I would worry about SCC.
I would not take the risk to leave it.  If it doesn't match the spec it must be removed.

Is there any marking on the flange?  What alloy was specified?

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Plymouth Tube

RE: Material Identification

You should also check the fitting with a magnet. If it is austenitic, you'll know right away because the magnet will not cling to the fitting.

If the fitting is strongly magnetic, I would still have a sample remove for complete chemistry. I have seen strange results from portable alloy analyzers used in the field that were out of calibration, mis-applied or used on improperly prepared surfaces.
 

RE: Material Identification

Robday2000:

Regarding your surface preparation, is there any schance you could have picked up contamination from the tool used to clean the surface? This could possibly explain the Co and/or Mn levels.

I've had a look in all my references and can't find anything getting close to the chemistry you give.

RE: Material Identification

(OP)
I dont think it is a contamination issue with the equipment as I had done around 100 readings before and after this particular flange. All readings were fine except this one. Only possible contamination could be from the petroleum coke???

I tested the flange numerous times and in 2 different locations and got similar results.

I'll have a look again tomorrow with a magnet and to look at the idents. Whatever the case, it will definitely want chopping.

RE: Material Identification

High manganese levels will evidently make it non magnetic in my opinion.This test may be misleading.

 Sorry for my ignorance,but does a corrosion resistant alloy have high Co and Mn?

I have not failed. I've just found 10,000 ways that won't work." — Thomas Edison
_____________________________________
 

RE: Material Identification

Stellite has Co

Maraging steels have Co

RE: Material Identification

robday2000;
There is one other possibility, you may be testing in a location(s) that were weld repaired or contain a weld build-up for corrosion protection. Check to see if the flange is ASME B16.5.

RE: Material Identification

The are Co, Mn, low C, wear resistant alloys, but they shouldn't be in a flange.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Plymouth Tube

RE: Material Identification

Ed,
That is precisely my concern. This alloy chemistry should not have been on a flange material. It really beats me.

I have not failed. I've just found 10,000 ways that won't work." — Thomas Edison
_____________________________________
 

RE: Material Identification

(OP)
I think this is 1 1/4 Chrome. The flange opposite is 1 1/4 chrome and has the same idents. Retested the flange and gave a different reading to the ones I was getting before.

Strange. I have checked the calibration on my set and its fine. Must just be one of those things. Possibly contamination played a part.

RE: Material Identification

robday2000;
This is why you should remove a sample and verify actual chemical composition results if there is a problem with PMI devices.  

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources