×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

effective length of column

effective length of column

effective length of column

(OP)
Please tell me how to calculate effective length of column for an industrial building where in one direction it is connected by truss at the top only and on the other direction transverse beams. Shall we consider the total height of the column from the truss level to floor or the intermediate transverse beam center to centre for considering effective length

RE: effective length of column

I would consider the total length for two reasons:

1.  It is conservative to do so for slenderness/buckling computations
2.  Any load (from transverse beam, etc.) below the primary load at the top of the column is just an auxiliary load; i.e., it doesn't matter if it is a beam load or if you're hanging widgets off the side of the column...it is just another load on the same axial member.

RE: effective length of column

As an ME I would have a question for Ron then:

If the traverse beam is lower than the truss and also provides a bracing force to prevent buckling, wouldn't it serve to stiffen the column and have an effect on the calculation?
Or is it standard practice to iqnore the lateral bracing effect and just add the additional vertical load to the column support and buckling calculations?

Don Leffingwell

RE: effective length of column

If the transverse beam is, in fact, lower than the truss but is framed normal to the plane of the truss and if the beam is itself connected to a flooring which is continuous over several beams then it would appear that one could count on the lateral restraint in that direction (at the intermediate point at the beam).

I would neglect the beam if it weren't fastened such as to prevent lateral movement of the column.

The only other reservation I have is during construction.  Is it possible to complete the roofing prior to placing the floor framing...in that case I would definitely use the entire column length.

RE: effective length of column

Don,
You are correct that it could provide some bracing, but we usually don't consider the affect unless in more than one direction (as Qshake alluded).  Unfortunately, we are giving simplistic answers to partial scenarios.  With more info we could probably consider more affect, though not always.

RE: effective length of column

The column, in general, may not have the same 'I' in both directions. It is
therefore necessary to consider the effective length in the two directions
and compute the K*l/r factor for the two directions and take the worse
 of the two. Note that 'K' depends on the restraint provided at top and bottom.
So, just consideration of a length alone may not suffice. You may have lateral
 diagonel bracing (wind bracing) as well in Industrial structures. That will
reduce the K to 1.0 whereas the truss at the top may not provide a lateral
restraint at the top in that direction and you may need to use a K of 2.0 or 2.1.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources