×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Required Mesh for Plate Analysis

Required Mesh for Plate Analysis

Required Mesh for Plate Analysis

(OP)
I have modelled a 10 ft by 10 ft concrete plate with a hydrostatic load to verify the output against plate formulas in "Roark's Formulas for Stess and Strain"  So I can apply to a concrete tank model.  Using the quadmesh tool, I need about a 3" mesh before results seem to converge.  

Is this reasonable? I am new to Risa. The tank I need to model is 212 ft by 50 ft x 25 ft, so a 3" mesh makes a huge model.

Thanks in advance for any help.

RE: Required Mesh for Plate Analysis

I generally get reasonable results with a 1 ft by 1 ft mesh.  Anything finer will make the solution take forever.  Also, this makes for easy load input and interpretation of results.  Consider modeling a quarter tank, if everything is symmetrical.

RE: Required Mesh for Plate Analysis

(OP)
Thanks for the response.  

When you say "reasonable results" do you mean the results are close to published plate results?

RE: Required Mesh for Plate Analysis

Yes.  I do it both ways, PCA Tank tables and finite element, and use the worst result at each location. I'm not confident enough to do it one way.  Haven't done one in a while, so I forget how close is close.  If I did one now, I'd be happy with agreement within 10-15%.

RE: Required Mesh for Plate Analysis

Make sure you width to thickness ratio of each plate is 3:1 or smaller. Otherwise your results will not be accurate.  

RE: Required Mesh for Plate Analysis

(OP)
I will have to adjust my mesh to match the 3:1 ratio.  I was using a 33" wall with the 3" mesh

Thanks for the help.

RE: Required Mesh for Plate Analysis

I should point out that the 3:1 ratio is not a magic number. That's the recommended limit.  But, it not like a 4:1 ratio is going to produce 100% inaccurate results.  

Instead, you will get a gradual degradation of the results as you get larger than the 3 to 1 ratio.  But, it should be gradual.  Not like in the old days (1970's elements) where you'd get "shear locking" and your results immediately turned to garbage when you exceed their thickness limit.  

That beins said an 11 to 1 ratio certainly exceeds the limit by a significant amount! Hence, I'd be very, very cautious about using a ratio that large.  

RE: Required Mesh for Plate Analysis

Another thing:  What results were you looking at to converge?  Frequently, you will get localized stress risers around a point support or a point applied load.  I do not generally look at these stresses to determine convergence.  

Instead, I like to look at deflection to determine convergence.  I usually use about a 10% convergence rule.  If I can sub-mesh 2x2 and the max deflection changes by less than 10% then I feel like I have converged.   

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources