×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Why NOT to pneumatic test

Why NOT to pneumatic test

Why NOT to pneumatic test

(OP)
There's an email going around now with pictures of the aftermath of this incident:

http://www.shanghaidaily.com/sp/article/2009/200902/20090207/article_390150.htm

Here's your key bullet:

The explosion occurred during a pressure test of the equipment, according to the city government media office. Workers were pumping air into a gasifier when some 500 meters of the piping network burst into fragments, buckling cement crossbeams.

****
Looking at the pictures, this was clearly high pressure rated pipe, so I've no doubt the test pressure was quite high and the stored energy somewhere north of enormous.

I cropped one of the images out of the PDF file and attached it to this post.  If you get to see the full file, definitely check it out.

To be certain, pneumatic testing has it's place.  But, the large amounts of stored energy involved must be respected.

Edward L. Klein
Pipe Stress Engineer
Houston, Texas

"All the world is a Spring"

All opinions expressed here are my own and not my company's.

RE: Why NOT to pneumatic test

Ooooo!  That one's going in my train wreck file.

**********************
"Pumping accounts for 20% of the world's energy used by electric motors and 25-50% of the total electrical energy usage in certain industrial facilities."-DOE statistic (Note: Make that 99% for pipeline companies) http://virtualpipeline.spaces.live.com/

RE: Why NOT to pneumatic test

Maybe someday the data on target pressure total hoop stress etc. will emerge.  Right now all anyone knows is that there was an explosion during pneumatic testing.  I recently shut down a test because the ambient was less than the minimum I specified--violating that procedure would have put a half dozen people at risk and probably wouldn't have made the international press.  

Any test is risky if there is not a competent test procedure or if the test procedure is not followed.  I think I'll wait a bit on this one before changing behaviour.

David

RE: Why NOT to pneumatic test

Based on the picture and the following information in the video and press release I believe that something other than an overpressure existed. Looking the picture posted by StressGuy the scene was vaguely familiar with an explosion that I was privy to where there was an explosion that traveled several hundred yards and destroyed a lot of piping and a heater. I went looking and found the following additional information.

http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2009-02/07/content_10779866.htm

http://www.shanghaidaily.com/sp/article/2009/200902/20090207/article_390150.htm

RE: Why NOT to pneumatic test

Judging, okay guessing, from the way it's crushed and buckled, the pipe in the movie looks awfully thin walled.



 

Mike Halloran
Pembroke Pines, FL, USA

RE: Why NOT to pneumatic test

Not sure if any speculation added, but this is what I get from ex-coworker who was at the scene:
The blast happened at pneumatic testing a 500m length 36" natural gas pipe line. The testing pressure is 15.6Mpa. When the pressure reaches 12.3Mpa, a flange at the battery limit broke from the root of the hub, 3-4cm from the circ weld seam. The flange itself flied away 100m.The released air swing the pipe and totaled the gasifier and surrounding piping. The fracture is clear-cut. It is up to further investigation to find out the cause.
 

--It boils down to simple math--

RE: Why NOT to pneumatic test

"I believe something other than overpressure existed" could it be that the piping, welding material and related materials were made in China? I always say buy USA!!

RE: Why NOT to pneumatic test

So, was the test a failure or success?

Charlie
www.facsco.com

RE: Why NOT to pneumatic test

FACS,

The test was a sucess, it found the defect in the piping.

I had 6 failures on some jacketed SS piping spools that required the spools to be broken down and the core pipe replaced. This took a lot of time and money but in the end I got an Attaboy because I insisted that all the spools be tested after being received from the fabricator who had graphited the shop test reports.

RE: Why NOT to pneumatic test

it  seems one month ago ,i havn't heard that though i was  near shanghai  .there are many accident we  do not know  .

mainly because corruption from the design to the purchase ,
every step...

many famous multinational company just know the  market of china ,and used to  it  ,enjoy it  as  he want to survival in this fields :)

 

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources