×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Standard for Glass Sealed Hermetic Connectors?

Standard for Glass Sealed Hermetic Connectors?

Standard for Glass Sealed Hermetic Connectors?

(OP)
I'll try to make this as short as possible, so please bare with me.

We make corrosion probes that are placed into the process with the back side connector out of the process for electrical hookup to read the probe. Over the lifetime of the probe, the probe element may corrode thru allowing process to enter the internals of the probe, meaning the hermetic glass seal 6-pin connector on the back side is now the pressure barrier.

Trying to get CRN's for the probes so we can sell in Canada has become somewhat of a headache. We must conform to a design standard, but I cannot figure out how? I have done wall thickness calcs on the wall of the connector, using the BPVC assuming the connector is a pressure vessel. However this does not address the glass seals. I cannot find any standards pertaining to glass seals.

According to UG-101(m), MAWP may be determined from burst tests. However, when this was presented to ABSA, they said that a burst pressure of 10X the MAWP must be obtained if glass is your pressure barrier. That would mean our burst pressure would have to be in the area of 60000psi!!!

Any ideas why the burst pressure has to be so high for glass? Any ideas on a standard for glass sealed pins in a connector?

Thank you.

RE: Standard for Glass Sealed Hermetic Connectors?

MikeRCS,

There might be some different requirements for primay verus seconday seal that might make the requirements for glass seal secondary barrier more reasonable.   One flow meter sensor that had a ceramic signal feedthru and glass-fused into a Kovar housing was required to be subjected to 10 thermal cycles while at test pressure.  The straight hole of the housing allowed the ceramic to drift and finally leak after 3 cycles.  The remedy was to design a shoulder into the straight hole to hold the ceramic insert against the pressure.  The flow sensor had very thin 0.002 inch thickness stainless steel diaphragm - so leakage thru to the ceramic feedthru was very real possibility.   The ceramic feedthru and housing was made by Vernitron in Cleveland, I think.  The glass frit used to seal the ceramic to the KOVAR housing was selected to match the low expansion charcteristics of the ceramic and the KOVAR housing.  The test pressure was the CL600 rating of flow meter body.

A brittle material is usually designed at a higher 10X factor to avoid getting anywhere near the tensile failure point.  If the glass part could be shown to not be subjected to pressure tensile stresses (just shear stress?) maybe the design factor is much lower than the 10X of glass housing.  

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources