×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

A problem in Rayleigh Approximation(NBC)

A problem in Rayleigh Approximation(NBC)

A problem in Rayleigh Approximation(NBC)

(OP)
I am hoping to hear any suggestions or comments from fellow engineers regarding following point.

NBC(Canadian Building Code) uses Rayleigh Approximation to calculate period of vibration.

T=2*pi*sqrt(SUM(Wi*di^2)/g/SUM(Wi*di))
 
where Wi =  weight of ith section of the structure
      di = deflection of the section
      a section is regarded as having uniform diameter,
      uniform stiffness, unformly distributed weight over
      the length.
      g = acceleration of gravity

I understand that deflection di in this formula is what is calculated on the basis that the uniform weight of the section acts as a uniform lateral load.
If I am right, I can raise a problem.

Let's say we are having two identical uniform towers whose lengths are 100 feet. Top deflection of tower A regarded as ONE section must be the same as sum of top deflections of arbitrarily divided multiple sections of tower B,
i.e., d of tower A = SUM(di of tower B).

Since SUM(Wi)*(SUM(di))^2/(SUM(Wi)*SUM(di)) is mathmatically smaller than SUM(Wi*di^2)/SUM(Wi*di), T of tower A will have bigger value than T of tower B. This result is obviously wrong because two towers are identical.

I actually compared and found difference was significant.

With 100 ft high, 4 ft diameter, 50000 lbs total weight, 0.75" thick circular steel tower,
One section calculation gives 1.09 seconds of T,
Two sections calculation gives 0.80 seconds of T,
Five sections calculation gives 0.52 seconds of T.
(I also compared these T's with T calculated by different formula, i.e., T=0.0000265*(H/D)^2*(w*D/t)^0.5. It gave me 0.86 seconds)
 
In further calculations of WIND load or SEISMIC load, T is important factor. For example, if T is less than 0.7, no top lateral force is regarded as existing. I wonder whether I can rely on Rayleigh Approximation when it gives floating values depend on how I decide to divide the tower into sections.

RE: A problem in Rayleigh Approximation(NBC)

Kyong,

Are you quite sure that you are interpreting di correctly?

While I am not familiar with your code, I would not be at all surprised if di is meant to be the deflection of the complete tower at the height where you have concentrated the mass Wi, and not just the deflection within section i.

If you try that, do you get more consistent results?

RE: A problem in Rayleigh Approximation(NBC)

(OP)
austim,

I read the code again. di is surely deflection of ith section. I still callculated T taking di as total deflection, though. Result was surprising. T remained same, 1.09 second, regardless of number of sections. How sharp you are! But, I was disappointed soon. If di were total deflection, the formula would reduce as follow.
T=2*pi*sqrt(SUM(Wi*di^2)/g/SUM(Wi*di))
T=2*pi*sqrt(di^2*SUM(Wi)/g/(di*SUM(Wi))
T=2*pi*sqrt(di^2/di/g)
T=2*pi*sqrt(di/g)
T became regardless of distribution of weight or deflection. If so, the code wouldn't have written the complex formula.

RE: A problem in Rayleigh Approximation(NBC)

kyong,

Glad to assist with your first problem.  Now to your new one, which is much easier.

Basically, your algebra is incorrect.  You can't take di out of the terms SUM(Wi*di) and SUM(Wi*di^2) unless di is constant for the full height of the tower.  It is easier to see your error if you expand SUM(Wi*di) into all of its terms.

For example, consider just three locations.  That will give SUM(Wi*di) = W1*d1+W2*d2+W3*d3.

You can't turn that into di*SUM(Wi) [which = di*(W1+W2+W3)] unless di=d1=d2=d3. This will only occur if your tower has zero deflection full height.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources