×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

What's behind the scene of using semi regid diaphragm

What's behind the scene of using semi regid diaphragm

What's behind the scene of using semi regid diaphragm

(OP)
Dear members

In ETABS v.9, it allows to use semi-rigid diaphragm to model a floor diaphragm. CSI said that the semi rigid diaphragm considers actual stiffness of elements rather than assuming a kinematic assumption as rigid diaphragm does. The question is, if so, what is the advantage of rigid diaphragm over the flexible model (without assigning any diaphragm)? Second, if so, do we need to consider the accidental torsion as stated by most design code when a semi-rigid diaphragm option is selected? Can anyone suggest.

Thanks

RE: What's behind the scene of using semi regid diaphragm

Well, i always use semi rigid diaphragm option.  That is more accurate than rigid, and will avoid some of the problems that rigid diaphragm could introduce.

As for no diaphragm, I don't know how you would have a stable model for typical office type building, where all the floor beams are pinned to the columns.  The diaphragm is required to take wind/seismic loads and apply them to the lateral resisting system.

IMO, you should still consider accidental torsion, even with semi rigid, unless the code says that analysis based on actual stiffness does not require accidental torsion.  But even then, are you rally modeling "actual stiffness"?  I still think not, as we have assumed pinned and assumed fixed conditions, arbitrary stiffness reduction for assumed cracking, etc...

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources