Rule of Thumb for Sizing Steel Girders
Rule of Thumb for Sizing Steel Girders
(OP)
I'm in the process of trying to estimate a girder depth for a feasibility level study. Looking for some quick rules of thumb for estimating girder depth based on length and girder spacing for a steel girder/composite deck panel. The structure is double lane (10.8 m deck with 0.4 m curb or 10 m running surface)and approx. 90 m in length. I'm initally using 4 girders @ 3.0 m spacing, 0.9 m deck overhang each side and a 250 mm deck width.
Thanks
Thanks





RE: Rule of Thumb for Sizing Steel Girders
You could probably reduce the deck thickness a little, unless that includes a wearing surface or girder haunch.
These are rough guidelines, and your mileage may vary depending on live load, local code requirements, etc.
RE: Rule of Thumb for Sizing Steel Girders
This is, as you pointed out, a back of the napkin estimate.
The 250 mm does include 25mm of surfacing, the actual design deck is 225 mm.
RE: Rule of Thumb for Sizing Steel Girders
If this is total length equal to 90m, then you can divide the spans to meet a interior span length to exterior span length ratio of 1.10 as most economical. Of course then you have see if you can actually fit the piers at those locations. If you can use a three span arrangement, this will result in the cheapest bridge that can use concrete prestressed beams. Probably around 30" to 36" or 0.760m to 1m.
If the 90m is a single span or two span you will wind up using steel. For the case of the two span bridge with equal spans a depth of girder will likely be 2m to 3m. For a single span, the depth will likely be in the range of 3m to 4m.
As was mentioned before there are some other factors not the least of which is the pedestrian access. If pedestrians are allowed across the bridge, the span to depth ratio gets higher, around L/1000 and that could control your depth.
Regards,
![[pipe] pipe](https://www.tipmaster.com/images/pipe.gif)
Qshake
Eng-Tips Forums:Real Solutions for Real Problems Really Quick.
RE: Rule of Thumb for Sizing Steel Girders
Thanks again for the advice.
RE: Rule of Thumb for Sizing Steel Girders
RE: Rule of Thumb for Sizing Steel Girders
RE: Rule of Thumb for Sizing Steel Girders
To do this properly the contractor will either have to use falsework in the stream and splice. Or if lifting at once, there will need to be a laydown area constructed over the stream to splice the girder, lift it and walk it in with cranes on each side.
Not only is this expensive, it will limit the number of contractors that can bid the job thereby driving cost up due to lack of competition. If your in an area where there is no available steel fabrication shop, such a large girder may prohibit a small yet qualified fabricator from bidding due to lack of handling or laydown area in the shop for such a girder.
Good Luck.
Regards,
![[pipe] pipe](https://www.tipmaster.com/images/pipe.gif)
Qshake
Eng-Tips Forums:Real Solutions for Real Problems Really Quick.
RE: Rule of Thumb for Sizing Steel Girders
Another compelling argument for a couple of piers.
The funny thing is the current structure comprises timber trestles on each end about 30 m in length (approx. 35 ,1960 vintage timber piles, on each end). Any modification, even two narrow piers, will be an improvement.
RE: Rule of Thumb for Sizing Steel Girders
If you have a layout in mind, why can't you just do a quick run in your steel deign software to get a prelim girder size?? That's what I typically do for structure studies to get my number girders and rough plate sizes, weight of steel, etc. I can't see that taking more than 1/2 hour of your time.