×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Foam/sponge rubber "expansion rate"?

Foam/sponge rubber "expansion rate"?

Foam/sponge rubber "expansion rate"?

(OP)
I have a customer asking me for a foam rubber formulation recommendation, and they want an "expansion rate" of 1.45-1.5. I don't work with sponge, so I'm not familiar with the term. Does this refer to the increase in volume after expansion (by blowing agents)? Or the speed of expansion?

If it's a volume change, their requirement for a Shore A hardness of ~75 Shore A seems like it might be difficult for a rubber sponge with a 50% increase in volume from unblown.


On a related topic, I've recently learned about "Expancel" materials for making foamed materials, including rubber, it seems. Has anybody worked with these materials?
http://www.expancel.com/


Thanks,
tom

RE: Foam/sponge rubber "expansion rate"?

Tom, the hardness quoted will be the unblown form of the compound. That is, use a compound that has a known hardness of 75 Shore A and add a suitable blowing agent. I suggest you talk to your customer regarding his/her definition of "expansion rate".

To me Expancel looks like an attempt to move away from azo-based blowing agents, which have been tenuously linked to health problems.

 

RE: Foam/sponge rubber "expansion rate"?

(OP)
Graham,
I did get a clarification of this from the customer, and they do want 65-85 Shore A AFTER foaming, and the expansion rate means the volume is ~1.5x bigger after foaming. Presumably, if I started with a compound w/specific gravity of 1.2 (g/cc), then 1.2g/1.5cc = 0.8 g/cc density.

It seems to me like it'd be easier to just specify the needed specific gravity/density of the finished sponge, without worrying about the unblown sg, but that's what the customer wants.

Any thoughts on what hardness I'd have to start with, unblown, to get 65-85 blown? I'm thinking it'd have to be ~95A.

tom

RE: Foam/sponge rubber "expansion rate"?

I think that in order to get that high a hardness the foam would have to have unblown, high-density skins over a lower density core. Is that allowed by your customer?

RE: Foam/sponge rubber "expansion rate"?

From my information, you need a button of at least 8mm thickness on which to perform a hardness test. This would preclude having a high hardness skin on the part. It is more usual to determine the hardness on a cured, unblown compound and then add the blowing agent, as I said in my first post. I have never, ever, heard of a foamed component having such a high hardness. I suggest you read the relevant parts of ISO48 and ASTM, the standards covering hardness measurements.

Regarding the amount of blow, you need to add 1/3 less compound than that needed to fill the mould cavity for a solid part. In other words, if, for example, the part weights 100g then you need to add approximately 67g of compound containing a suitable agent to achieve 50% blow.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources