×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
• Talk With Other Members
• Be Notified Of Responses
• Keyword Search
Favorite Forums
• Automated Signatures
• Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

#### Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

# Lx,Ly and UNB,UNT in STAAD

## Lx,Ly and UNB,UNT in STAAD

(OP)
Hi!!!!

In STAAD if we specify Lx,Ly and UNB,UNT commands to a full member (even when it has not been split up by nodes) how will STAAD respond??

### RE: Lx,Ly and UNB,UNT in STAAD

It uses the values for the parameters that you specify regardless of the member length.

### RE: Lx,Ly and UNB,UNT in STAAD

(OP)
Thaks Steve,

But in that case, using UNB,UNT for beams instead of Lx,Ly should result in a different Interaction Ratio right??
Because UNB,UNT commands in general prove to be critical for beams...

One file has secondary members modeled in it with both UNB,UNT & Lx,Ly commands for member 1. (The comments in the editor file will specify which is member 1)
When you analyse with Lx,Ly commands it'll give some interaction ratios for members.
When you analyse with UNB,UNT commands you'll get higher interaction ratios... UNB,UNT will be critical.

The second file does not have secondary members but still has UNB,UNT & Lx,Ly commands for member 1.
But in analysis of file 2, both the commands give almost similar interaction ratios..

Can u kindly look into it and explain the reason??

### RE: Lx,Ly and UNB,UNT in STAAD

Lx and Ly is used for calculating the allowable compression in a member. UNB and UNT is used for calculating the allowable bending stress in a member.

### RE: Lx,Ly and UNB,UNT in STAAD

It should be Ly & Lz. these are the local axes where Lx is not right.

### RE: Lx,Ly and UNB,UNT in STAAD

You are right! LZ and LY

### RE: Lx,Ly and UNB,UNT in STAAD

(OP)
Agreed Guys... It's Ly,Lz only.. I had used Lx,Ly as just indicative parameters..

Any observations on the behavior in the two models..
Think it'll throw some light...

#### Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

#### Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Close Box

# Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

• Talk To Other Members
• Notification Of Responses To Questions
• Favorite Forums One Click Access
• Keyword Search Of All Posts, And More...

Register now while it's still free!