Smart questions
Smart answers
Smart people
Join Eng-Tips Forums
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Member Login




Remember Me
Forgot Password?
Join Us!

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips now!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

Join Eng-Tips
*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.
Jobs from Indeed

Link To This Forum!

Partner Button
Add Stickiness To Your Site By Linking To This Professionally Managed Technical Forum.
Just copy and paste the
code below into your site.

subbu1985 (Structural) (OP)
17 Feb 09 23:59
Hi!!!!

In STAAD if we specify Lx,Ly and UNB,UNT commands to a full member (even when it has not been split up by nodes) how will STAAD respond??
SteveGregory (Structural)
18 Feb 09 13:30
It uses the values for the parameters that you specify regardless of the member length.
subbu1985 (Structural) (OP)
19 Feb 09 0:11
Thaks Steve,

But in that case, using UNB,UNT for beams instead of Lx,Ly should result in a different Interaction Ratio right??
Because UNB,UNT commands in general prove to be critical for beams...

I've attached two STAAD files for your reference..
Both with similar loading..

One file has secondary members modeled in it with both UNB,UNT & Lx,Ly commands for member 1. (The comments in the editor file will specify which is member 1)
When you analyse with Lx,Ly commands it'll give some interaction ratios for members.
When you analyse with UNB,UNT commands you'll get higher interaction ratios... UNB,UNT will be critical.

The second file does not have secondary members but still has UNB,UNT & Lx,Ly commands for member 1.
But in analysis of file 2, both the commands give almost similar interaction ratios..

Can u kindly look into it and explain the reason??

 
SteveGregory (Structural)
19 Feb 09 8:05
Lx and Ly is used for calculating the allowable compression in a member. UNB and UNT is used for calculating the allowable bending stress in a member.
muh2008 (Structural)
19 Feb 09 17:01
It should be Ly & Lz. these are the local axes where Lx is not right.
SteveGregory (Structural)
19 Feb 09 17:04
You are right! LZ and LY
subbu1985 (Structural) (OP)
20 Feb 09 1:27
Agreed Guys... It's Ly,Lz only.. I had used Lx,Ly as just indicative parameters..

Anyway.. Did u check the STAAD Models that i had sent????
Any observations on the behavior in the two models..
Think it'll throw some light...

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close