×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

modeling symmetry vs whole model

modeling symmetry vs whole model

modeling symmetry vs whole model

(OP)
I have a 24" dia tubesheet plate 1" thick with 2" dia holes on a 60^ pitch on 2-5/16" centers welded on the OD. The tubesheet has a surface pressure on one side and zero on the backside. Also, there are surface loads around the hold diameters. I first modeled the plate as a quarter plate using Z & Y symmetry boundary conditions. This resulted in an extremely high stress point (twice the ultimate)at the intersection of the two symmetry planes; the center of the plate. I then modeled the entire plate. Same loads. The stress results were about half.

My question is: why do the two modeling methods produce such different results?  

RE: modeling symmetry vs whole model

They shouldn't !

Check that your boundary conditions in both models are correctly applied.

RE: modeling symmetry vs whole model

(OP)
Could the "common edge", where the two symmetry planes meet and has the boundary conditions for both symmetry plains applied, be causing a problem?

Other than that, the boundary conditions check out.

RE: modeling symmetry vs whole model

"Could the "common edge", where the two symmetry planes meet and has the boundary conditions for both symmetry plains applied, be causing a problem? "

No, it shouldn't.

Perhaps you can attach an image of your model and the BC's applied

RE: modeling symmetry vs whole model

(OP)
johnhors,
I hate to ask a dumb question, but how do I attach an image to a thread. I have run the Algor report with the constraints listed and copied an image of the model. But I don't know where to go from there.

I just registered with Engineering.com, but can't figure out how to upload, as the message in the "Attachment" says.  

RE: modeling symmetry vs whole model

In the reply window there is step 3 below for an attachment or upload.

RE: modeling symmetry vs whole model

Was you mesh size larger when you did the whole part? At first glance it looks as though your results are accurate.

RE: modeling symmetry vs whole model

I can't really comment without knowing how the surface and part ID's relate to the image.

One thing that strikes me as odd, is that you have rotational supports specified with solid brick elements. I have never used Algor, does it really have rotational degrees of freedom for nodes in its brick elements?

RE: modeling symmetry vs whole model

No. But when you select the surface and "fix it". All the possible DOF's are restrained. For brick elements the rotational DOF's dont do anything.

RE: modeling symmetry vs whole model

Something doesn't look right.  It seems like the stress pattern would be more uniform unless the loads on the surfaces of the holes are not consistent.

You are correct that the rotational degrees of freedom are meaningless in the context of the analysis.

Can you remove the stress results, turn on loads and boundary conditions and upload that picture?  Color by surface, please.

Thanks,
Garland

RE: modeling symmetry vs whole model

(OP)
Attached is the loads and boundary conditions. With the surface load and loads around the holes, the surfaces did not show very well, so I've added a second page with just the surfaces shown.

Thanks for all of your help.

For what it is worth, I also ran a full plate and then did a quick check using Roarke for a circular plate, no holes, with a uniform surface load. The Roarke formula fell in the area of the "full Plate" analysis.

RE: modeling symmetry vs whole model

It is difficult to see the applied loads, but this is what it looks like:

Pressure load on the entire face
Load around the rim of the tube penetrations
Load inside the tube penetrations
Partially constrained boundaries

The boundary conditions should be as follows:

for the face perpendicular to the y-axis, the BC's should be TyRxz

For the face perpendicular to the z axis, you should have TzRxy

I'm assuming you are pinned (Txyz) around the outer edge

The center "corner" of the model should be TyzRxyz

I just looked at the report again and noticed you have multiple parts?  What are the three parts?  This looks like it should be a single part.  Are there different materials for the parts?

When you get a chance, is it possible for you to upload an archive without results?  It's a lot easier to troubleshoot when you have the actual model.

Garland E. Borowski, PE
Engineering Manager
Star Aviation

RE: modeling symmetry vs whole model

(OP)
Garland,
I can confirm the following to you:
Applied loads are:
1. Pressure on the entire face
2. Load around the rim of the tube penetrations

Boundary conditions:
1. For face perpendicular to the y-axis: Ty, Rx, Rz
2. For face perpendicular to the z-axis: Tz, Rx, Ry
3. For the "center" corner: Ty, Tz, Rx, Ry, Rz
4. The outer edges are fixed. Although I did a "pinned" version that did not change the results.

There are (3) parts: the plate and then (2) fillet welds at the perimeter on each side of the plate. The materials are essentially the same: 316 SST for the plate and 309L for the welds.

The purpose of this analysis was to evaluate the welds, and try to reduce the size.

You have requested an upload of "an archive without results". Could you be a bit more specific? I don't understand what you are asking for.

RE: modeling symmetry vs whole model

If you go to "File: Archive: Create", it will ask if you want to create an archive with or without results.  If you choose "with results", you will get a very large file with all the stress and displacement results zipped up into a file with the extension ".ach".  Without results just zips up the nodes, elements, materials, etc.

If you are able to upload the .ach file, I can download it, extract it, and run it just to see what's going on, but it sounds like you have everything set up properly.  As mentioned previously for brick elements, "pinned" and "fixed" are identical in the Algor context.  Sounds like there is no reason why your results should be different, which is why I am curious about the model...

RE: modeling symmetry vs whole model

(OP)
Garland,
I am having problems uploading the file to Engineering.com. The zipped file is 28 M. I don't know if this is too large, but the site "times out". I am trying to find an FTP site, or I can email the file.

RE: modeling symmetry vs whole model

That is MUCH larger than I expected...doesn't seem like your file should be that large without the results.  Perhaps just upload the report file...I can figure out the rest from there.  If that doesn't work, try www.yousendit.com

RE: modeling symmetry vs whole model

It looks like your loads are applied twice...or, actually, like two different loads of the same type are each applied twice.  You have two pressure loads over the entire surface (150 psi and 218 psi) and you have two different linear loads applied as a surface force around each rim (5XX and 828 pounds).  Was this intentional?  Or could this be the problem?  

Also, your boundary conditions were a bit of a mess.  You can select multiple surfaces against which to apply the boundary conditions by holding down the control key after selecting your first surface.

The nodes, elements, etc. look fine.  Nothing that should cause problems.

When I deleted one set of each type of load (I maintained the higher loads in each case:  218 psi and 828 pounds), I ended up with deflections of 0.116 inch and stress of 114 ksi.  Not sure how this compares to your full model results, but when I deleted the symmetry boundary conditions and copied the quarter around, cleaned it up and reran it, it compared well.

RE: modeling symmetry vs whole model

(OP)
I had the load sets (218 & 150) set up to be "enabled", or not, for different loading conditions, 218 & 150 were not applied at the same time.

The results do not come close to the full plate model. In the full plate model, stress at the center is 62,000 and displacement is .084".

So, I am not sure where to go from here.

Thanks for your input and assistance.

RE: modeling symmetry vs whole model

I didn't see where either of the load sets were disabled in what you sent me.  When you developed the full model, did you just mirror what you have (because I don't think the mesh would like up that way), or did you have a different mesh size?  If your full model has a more or less defined mesh, results may vary.  If they vary as much as they seem to, you may need to perform a mesh sensitivity study (always recommended) to make sure you are reaching a proper convergence.  I haven't had sufficient time to "play" with this, but the displacement dither looked clean and the stress contours didn't surprise me.

RE: modeling symmetry vs whole model

So, I am not sure where to go from here.
Stating the obvious, did you contact the technical support folks at ALGOR.  Usually when I see questions regarding software applications that would seem to be best answered by the vendor, I think about two things:  1.  The technical support folks for the software package must be awful.  2.  The software is bootlegged and the operator does not have a legal license.
 

RE: modeling symmetry vs whole model

I did notice that you are not using the latest version...v.23 had to translate whatever version you are using (v.21?  v.22?).  The tech folks at Algor are going to ask you to send archives of each model so they can check for differences.  You may want to be ready for that...

RE: modeling symmetry vs whole model

Just for kicks, I ran a 10" radius, 1" thick 1/4 symmetry disk, pinned (fixed) rim with a 20 psi load and received the following:

VM Stress = 1318.8 psi
Deflection = 0.0012196

Mirroring the 1/4 model about an axis and then the 1/2 model about the other appropriate, perpendicular plane to complete the circle, I get the following:

VM Stress = 1318.8 psi
Deflection = 0.0012152

Your 1/4 model isn't on the global axes, and I didn't take the time to mirror and then move, but the comparison that I ran suggests that the software is reasonably consistent.

RE: modeling symmetry vs whole model

Just to qualify Zapster's rhetorical comment #1 regarding possible quality of support.  I own Algor.  My personal experience so far has been that support has been very good, patient with my questions and has always been very quick.  

I am expecting that the high standard of support will continue under Autodesk ownership.    

 

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources