×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Minimum thickness required for contact area

Minimum thickness required for contact area

Minimum thickness required for contact area

(OP)
Hi all.  I have a triangular load distribution due to contact between a plate and a hinged fitting.  I know load magnitude and contact area.

How do I go about determining minimum plate thickness required to prevent this thing being a can opener?  It seems that if I consider the load magnitude as the volume of a wedge, I get an astronomically high running load along the edge I'm concerned about.  Am I missing something here?

RE: Minimum thickness required for contact area

Well, you will get a stress raiser at the edge. It's actually a big deal when you are joining aluminium hardpoint plates into composite structures, but even your scenario can be a big deal. So, are you allowing for the flexibility in both the can opener and the plate?

Are you FEAing this or is it a hand calc?

Cheers

Greg Locock

SIG:Please see FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips.

RE: Minimum thickness required for contact area

I once managed to avoid a similar problem by introducing a radius at the edge of the stiffer fitting.

Dan
 

RE: Minimum thickness required for contact area

(OP)
The materials are 7075 aluminum.  Hand calculations are being performed and I haven't taken flexibility into account.

The hinged fitting is radiused along all contact edges.

RE: Minimum thickness required for contact area


 Show us a sketch, maybe it's easier to visualize.

RE: Minimum thickness required for contact area

what if you applied the resultant load at the centroid of the loading ... maybe you have a running load, consider an individual pitch ... but like dan posts above, a pic is worth 1,000 words

RE: Minimum thickness required for contact area

(OP)
Here's a sketch of what we have.  Load and dims are for a previous part.  Don't worry bout the right side not being radiused - the actual part will be.

This part will react against a piece of machined plate.  I'd like to have an idea on how to determine the minimum plate thickness so that we don't end up punching thru the plate with the part.

RE: Minimum thickness required for contact area

Looks like a can opener ...

Need a drawing of the structure that the part reacts against: plate and substructure.  And need dimensions in the width direction (into the paper on your first sketch)

 

RE: Minimum thickness required for contact area

well, you can solve for R1 (by statics) ... hint, about 12,000 lbs

a triangular bearing load (as shown) is a reasonable assumption, so you know the peak load per unit thickness.
hint, about 24,000 lbs/in

divid by thickness to be less than the bearing allowable (or either side of the interface). hint, about 0.25" (assuming Al)

lick of paint ...

RE: Minimum thickness required for contact area

If the pin and hole locations and sizes are not "real" exact, you will get point loading at the end.  If you are doing this analysis for safety, I would assume that the loading is concentrated at the end of the part.

Timelord

RE: Minimum thickness required for contact area

i'd be more worried about bending of the link, at the pin ...

the moment in the link is about 10,000 in.lbs,
at 0.25in thk the bending stress is something like 60,000/(1^2*0.25) = 240ksi ... better be steel

RE: Minimum thickness required for contact area

(OP)
All -

Thank you so much for your responses.  I've been trying to clean up another inherited mess (another idiot who thought shearing stress due to bending is V/A).

rb -

I think we're on the same wavelength here.  I guess my brain is vapor locked on this:

divid by thickness to be less than the bearing allowable (or either side of the interface). hint, about 0.25" (assuming Al)

Could you elaborate a little on this?

BTW - the link has two legs approx .6 wide each.
 

RE: Minimum thickness required for contact area


What if you check the link for bearing stress at the edge and the plate it bears upon as if the link was, indeed, a can opener. That is, check for shear in the plate along the edge of the link. (shear area = link width + 2x distance to (say) R2 x plate thickness.) If the link is radiused, this calculation will probably be very conservative and you will never have to worry.


 

RE: Minimum thickness required for contact area

"divide by thickness to be less than the bearing allowable (or either side of the interface). hint, about 0.25" (assuming Al)"

triangular distributed load, peak = A, span = B
resultant = A*B/2 = R1
R1 = 12,000lbs
B = 1in (near enough)
A (peak contact load) = 12,000*2/1 = 24,000 lbs/in

bearing stress = peak load/thk = 24,000/0.25 = 96ksi

but look at bending through the pivot M = 10,000 in.lbs
stress, for 0.25" thk, = 6*M/(0.25*1^2) = 240ksi

of course if there are two links then this'd be the combined thickness.  how are the links joined together ?  how is the load applied to the combination (to has link ? to the middle of the spacer ??)
 

RE: Minimum thickness required for contact area

(OP)
rb -

So what you did is figure out the thickness of the link required to bring it under Fbry, right?

My concern is the thickness of the material under the link, i.e. the machined base, not the link itself.  I have the link pretty well figured out.

The link is loaded by contact along the vertical face.  I've attached an old solid model of the part to give you an idea.  

 

RE: Minimum thickness required for contact area

well i figured that 0.25" would be sufficient width for Al for contact, but this is not sufficient for bending about the pivot.

but it seems you're asking not about the link, but about the structure that link contacts.  but that's a whole different thing.  this it one thick flange ? does it have stiffeners ? aligned to the link axis or normal (so that only a small area is fully effective) ?  on one level, how much area would have to shear for the links to break the supporting structure ? how does the supporting structure react to the link loads (bending ?) ??

RE: Minimum thickness required for contact area

(OP)
Bingo!  I'm more concerned about the shearing of material under the links.  The base sits atop standard honeycomb floor panel.  For simplicity consider the base as a plate of uniform thickness.

RE: Minimum thickness required for contact area

tabanac !  

so it's either ...
1) the panel is essentially rigid, what pressure does it take to crush the honeycomb; or
2) the panel is flexible (being "rigidly" supported somewhere else) and bends like a beam.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources