×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

sag-rod supported girts (girt design)
3

sag-rod supported girts (girt design)

sag-rod supported girts (girt design)

(OP)
I have been told when designing girts with sag-rods that the girts can be considered laterally supported at the location of each sag-rod. I am unable to locate any technical data or examples to reference. If I were to design the girts without assuming lateral support from each sag-rod the girt sizes would become unreasonable. Does anyone have suggestions or references on this topic?

RE: sag-rod supported girts (girt design)

From "Lecture Notes for Structural Design of Industrial Buildings"
Prepared by James M. Fisher, Ph.D., P.E.

"The sag rods are often assumed to provide lateral restraint against buckling for suction loads."

DaveAtkins

RE: sag-rod supported girts (girt design)

If memory serves me right, it braces along one direction only.

RE: sag-rod supported girts (girt design)

Personally I wouldn't consider sag rods as providing lateral support for girts (or purlins for that matter) no matter how much literature is out there proving otherwise.  They need bridging like hokkie66 says and thats what we use in Australia.  

By the way Happy new year hokkie !

Cheers !

 

RE: sag-rod supported girts (girt design)

And a good one to you as well, civeng.  But I've got to get you to spell Hokie correctly.

RE: sag-rod supported girts (girt design)

Well, I have never been a fan of sag rods as bracing for girts but the practice seems to be firmly entrenched in my locality and I have to admit there has never been a problem of girt buckling so far as I am aware.  Of course, that does not necessarily make it right.

Best regards,

BA

RE: sag-rod supported girts (girt design)

Just to point out that in those two links that I posted above, the concept of sag rods acting as braces, only applies if the horizontal girt is installed with a slight, downward sag to begin with.  

With that initial sweep in the girt, any outward wind suction would compel the girt to buckle away from the sag rod, thus allowing the rod to work in tension, which it can do.

And in conjunction with the exterior siding, the rod-plus-siding combination creates a couple that can resist torsional twisting in the girt, thus dis-allowing lateral torsional buckling.

 

RE: sag-rod supported girts (girt design)

I do not believe that standard practice is to install girts with a slight sag.  The erectors try to get everything as plumb and level as possible.

Perhaps it would be a good idea to tie the lowest girt to the foundation with another sag rod.  It would not really be a sag rod...more of a hold-down device.

Best regards,

BA

RE: sag-rod supported girts (girt design)

BAretired,

When they hang the girt onto the columns, there is a natural, self-weight sag that occurs.  The contractor with either ignore it (if it is not noticable) or push it up to a more level condition.  We usually will note on our plans to ensure a minimum amount of downward sag, perhaps L/480 or something of the sort.  

It isn't much and it isn't really visible and doesn't affect any other aspects of the building.

 

RE: sag-rod supported girts (girt design)

(OP)
DaveAtkins,

Would you have a copy of lecture notes for a reference?

RE: sag-rod supported girts (girt design)

I agree with BA about the sag in the girts.  Installing "sag rods" and then insisting that the girts sag goes against the grain with me.  I like everything to be straight and level.  But then I am used to using a purpose designed system to ensure this occurs.

RE: sag-rod supported girts (girt design)

hokie66,
I guess I don't disagree wth your desire for everything to be straight.  I just know that most girt conditions occur in more industrial facilities where that sort of straightness isn't all that necessary.  

If you think about it - ALL of your horizontal beams in roofs and floors are definitely not straight at all.  Why does the girt have to be perfectly straight when its natural sag helps the stability.



 

RE: sag-rod supported girts (girt design)

Let's say that the girts are C sections.  The load on the wall will be suction pressure in order to cause compression in the interior flange.

If a C section is installed with web upward, then the shear center is above the web.  Load is applied by exterior paneling at about the middle of the exterior flange.  This is well below the shear center, so the channel rotation causes the interior flange to buckle downward.  This is what we want.

If the channel is installed with web down, the opposite is true and the inside flange tends to buckle upward.  So perhaps the correct way to install a C channel girt is web up (flanges down).

 

Best regards,

BA

RE: sag-rod supported girts (girt design)

You are correct - something to consider

RE: sag-rod supported girts (girt design)

But don't you use Z girts rather than C's in most cases?  We do, as you can lap the Z's.

Your theory is still good for a Z installed with the inside flange up, which is the predominant way, I think.  But if the inside flange is down, as is common in some industrial buildings to allow easier cleaning of debris, then the load is above the shear centre.  

RE: sag-rod supported girts (girt design)

Then arch it upwards if that is the case?

Most of the heavy warehouses we have done use wide flanges for the girders.  This is due to the long spacing between columns which in turn are located to work with the racking inside the buildings.

 

RE: sag-rod supported girts (girt design)

Do you mean rolled steel sections for the girts?  That sounds like a lot of work in screwing the sheeting.

RE: sag-rod supported girts (girt design)

I have reviwed severl WF girt metal buildings due to the long spans and/or deflection critical finish.

I think the Z girst are usually installed with the inside flange pointing upward.

RE: sag-rod supported girts (girt design)

jetboat:

I am not an expert on paneling, the following are merely personal thinking and observation.

In between end supports, the sag-rods provide stability to the paneling system in the direction of gravity. In another words, the rods "brace", and thus minimize the movement in that direction. I think the tendency of the channel to rotate around the rod is prevented by the jamming force from the fastening nuts, therefore, buckling is prevented as well. So, it is justfied to say the girt is braced at sag-rod.

At where I work, there are hundreds of steel building with steel paneling. The buildings are ranged from 30-90 years old, the height are ranged from 45' to 200'. Due to lake effect, the wind is a building killer. However, the damages are limited to wall/roof panels (completely torn from wall), so far haven't encounter problem with girt, except some were weakened by rust/corrosion. I guess this phenomenon can be explained by comparing the relative rigidity of the steel pannel, panel-girt connections, and the girt. Obviously, the weakest one has to break first.

Consult with a wall panel manufacture on usual wall span and member sizes, I think size of rod and spacing play an important role in the whole business.   

RE: sag-rod supported girts (girt design)

Very good experimental study.

RE: sag-rod supported girts (girt design)

Apologies hokie I guess its time for me to think about reading glasses!

As a interest what diameter rods do they use in the States?

Here they use to be 16mm but now have gone down to 12mm (1/2 inch rods) and they look very flimsy some purlin Companies actually use bridging throughout which is much better.

RE: sag-rod supported girts (girt design)

5/8" diameter on a project I engineered last year.

Which brings up another point--a 5/8" diameter rod which is 5' long (a typical girt spacing) can take 1000# of compression (Allowable Stress Design).  So the sag rods can also resist upward girt buckling.

DaveAtkins

RE: sag-rod supported girts (girt design)

I have begun to see a lot of contractors installing flange bracing on the backside of the girts.  The bracing is typically a light guage strap that is attached to the girt and to the interior face of the panel.  This detail only works if you are working with a foam panel siding.  

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources