sag-rod supported girts (girt design)
sag-rod supported girts (girt design)
(OP)
I have been told when designing girts with sag-rods that the girts can be considered laterally supported at the location of each sag-rod. I am unable to locate any technical data or examples to reference. If I were to design the girts without assuming lateral support from each sag-rod the girt sizes would become unreasonable. Does anyone have suggestions or references on this topic?






RE: sag-rod supported girts (girt design)
Prepared by James M. Fisher, Ph.D., P.E.
"The sag rods are often assumed to provide lateral restraint against buckling for suction loads."
DaveAtkins
RE: sag-rod supported girts (girt design)
RE: sag-rod supported girts (girt design)
thread507-184458: GIRTS
RE: sag-rod supported girts (girt design)
bh
RE: sag-rod supported girts (girt design)
RE: sag-rod supported girts (girt design)
By the way Happy new year hokkie !
Cheers !
RE: sag-rod supported girts (girt design)
RE: sag-rod supported girts (girt design)
Best regards,
BA
RE: sag-rod supported girts (girt design)
With that initial sweep in the girt, any outward wind suction would compel the girt to buckle away from the sag rod, thus allowing the rod to work in tension, which it can do.
And in conjunction with the exterior siding, the rod-plus-siding combination creates a couple that can resist torsional twisting in the girt, thus dis-allowing lateral torsional buckling.
RE: sag-rod supported girts (girt design)
Perhaps it would be a good idea to tie the lowest girt to the foundation with another sag rod. It would not really be a sag rod...more of a hold-down device.
Best regards,
BA
RE: sag-rod supported girts (girt design)
When they hang the girt onto the columns, there is a natural, self-weight sag that occurs. The contractor with either ignore it (if it is not noticable) or push it up to a more level condition. We usually will note on our plans to ensure a minimum amount of downward sag, perhaps L/480 or something of the sort.
It isn't much and it isn't really visible and doesn't affect any other aspects of the building.
RE: sag-rod supported girts (girt design)
Would you have a copy of lecture notes for a reference?
RE: sag-rod supported girts (girt design)
RE: sag-rod supported girts (girt design)
I guess I don't disagree wth your desire for everything to be straight. I just know that most girt conditions occur in more industrial facilities where that sort of straightness isn't all that necessary.
If you think about it - ALL of your horizontal beams in roofs and floors are definitely not straight at all. Why does the girt have to be perfectly straight when its natural sag helps the stability.
RE: sag-rod supported girts (girt design)
If a C section is installed with web upward, then the shear center is above the web. Load is applied by exterior paneling at about the middle of the exterior flange. This is well below the shear center, so the channel rotation causes the interior flange to buckle downward. This is what we want.
If the channel is installed with web down, the opposite is true and the inside flange tends to buckle upward. So perhaps the correct way to install a C channel girt is web up (flanges down).
Best regards,
BA
RE: sag-rod supported girts (girt design)
RE: sag-rod supported girts (girt design)
Your theory is still good for a Z installed with the inside flange up, which is the predominant way, I think. But if the inside flange is down, as is common in some industrial buildings to allow easier cleaning of debris, then the load is above the shear centre.
RE: sag-rod supported girts (girt design)
Most of the heavy warehouses we have done use wide flanges for the girders. This is due to the long spacing between columns which in turn are located to work with the racking inside the buildings.
RE: sag-rod supported girts (girt design)
RE: sag-rod supported girts (girt design)
I think the Z girst are usually installed with the inside flange pointing upward.
RE: sag-rod supported girts (girt design)
I am not an expert on paneling, the following are merely personal thinking and observation.
In between end supports, the sag-rods provide stability to the paneling system in the direction of gravity. In another words, the rods "brace", and thus minimize the movement in that direction. I think the tendency of the channel to rotate around the rod is prevented by the jamming force from the fastening nuts, therefore, buckling is prevented as well. So, it is justfied to say the girt is braced at sag-rod.
At where I work, there are hundreds of steel building with steel paneling. The buildings are ranged from 30-90 years old, the height are ranged from 45' to 200'. Due to lake effect, the wind is a building killer. However, the damages are limited to wall/roof panels (completely torn from wall), so far haven't encounter problem with girt, except some were weakened by rust/corrosion. I guess this phenomenon can be explained by comparing the relative rigidity of the steel pannel, panel-girt connections, and the girt. Obviously, the weakest one has to break first.
Consult with a wall panel manufacture on usual wall span and member sizes, I think size of rod and spacing play an important role in the whole business.
RE: sag-rod supported girts (girt design)
Here is an Canadian experimental study of girts under negative pressure which will clarify your doubts.
htt
LOKSTR
RE: sag-rod supported girts (girt design)
RE: sag-rod supported girts (girt design)
As a interest what diameter rods do they use in the States?
Here they use to be 16mm but now have gone down to 12mm (1/2 inch rods) and they look very flimsy some purlin Companies actually use bridging throughout which is much better.
RE: sag-rod supported girts (girt design)
Which brings up another point--a 5/8" diameter rod which is 5' long (a typical girt spacing) can take 1000# of compression (Allowable Stress Design). So the sag rods can also resist upward girt buckling.
DaveAtkins
RE: sag-rod supported girts (girt design)