How To - Transmission Re-Design
How To - Transmission Re-Design
(OP)
Hi Gents,
I am building a custom vehicle (small lightweight 2 seater sports car) and got my hands on a EJ255. This is the 2.5 litre turbo boxer engine used in the 2006+ Subaru WRX.
Most of you will know that the WRX is AWD.
In my application, I want to have the engine either in the mid or rear of the vehicle.
If I mount it mid, then the car will be rear wheel drive.
If I mount it rear, then the car will be AWD.
I am investigating my AWD options, and have come to you with a question:
If I use a WRX (or STi) transmission, to obtain the AWD, and mount the engine in the rear, the car will be prone to driving backwards(!). What modifications (and is it realistically possible) can be made to the AWD transmission to convert it to a rear engine AWD application? (and to be driving forwards!)
Also, I believe that in a standard WRX, the torque will be prioritised to the rear wheels? This would mean that in my application the priority would be going to the front wheels, whereas I'd like it to be in the rear - do you have any suggestions?
Essentially, I want to be driving the rear wheels and to use a viscous centre diff to drive the front. I will also consider the Porsche C4 transmission, however I believe the Subaru solution may be more cost effective(?).
Thankyou for your time and consideration :)
I am building a custom vehicle (small lightweight 2 seater sports car) and got my hands on a EJ255. This is the 2.5 litre turbo boxer engine used in the 2006+ Subaru WRX.
Most of you will know that the WRX is AWD.
In my application, I want to have the engine either in the mid or rear of the vehicle.
If I mount it mid, then the car will be rear wheel drive.
If I mount it rear, then the car will be AWD.
I am investigating my AWD options, and have come to you with a question:
If I use a WRX (or STi) transmission, to obtain the AWD, and mount the engine in the rear, the car will be prone to driving backwards(!). What modifications (and is it realistically possible) can be made to the AWD transmission to convert it to a rear engine AWD application? (and to be driving forwards!)
Also, I believe that in a standard WRX, the torque will be prioritised to the rear wheels? This would mean that in my application the priority would be going to the front wheels, whereas I'd like it to be in the rear - do you have any suggestions?
Essentially, I want to be driving the rear wheels and to use a viscous centre diff to drive the front. I will also consider the Porsche C4 transmission, however I believe the Subaru solution may be more cost effective(?).
Thankyou for your time and consideration :)





RE: How To - Transmission Re-Design
Corvair transaxles were not reversible, but could be driven from the front... but with the gearbox forward of the axle and the engine forward of that, you're looking at a long wheelbase or a really short engine.
Make it mid- engine and RWD.
The extra weight of the forward diff and whatever adapters you need will offset any performance margin for 4WD in a light car.
Mike Halloran
Pembroke Pines, FL, USA
RE: How To - Transmission Re-Design
It seems to me, that if I replace those diffs with ones that rotate in the opposite direction, then it's problem solved (in terms of getting the car to drive in the correct direction). Albeit, torque preference to the front wheels versus the rear wheels may still be in effect.
Is the concept of what I have suggested - replacing the diffs, a viable one?
RE: How To - Transmission Re-Design
I have a similarly high powered RWD car and it can't do what his does in the corners!
I may end up going with the RWD, but want to explore the AWD options firstly.
RE: How To - Transmission Re-Design
I have an EJ207 & 6spd from an STI spec C. (2006 model) I very quickly abandoned any idea of 4WD and opted for the mid-engine configuration. One major factor for me is minimizing polar mass on the vehicle. The CG of the engine/transmission is virtually over the engine mounts, the total engine + gearbox is 220kg (dry - without the centre diff & tailshaft) & the load on the rear engine mount is only 20kg. The mounts are 200mm forward of the rear axle so to turn the engine round will shift the mass 400mm back.
With all that extra weight trying to ovetake the front of the car I don't tink you will be able to ue the extra traction.
As Mike said, the weight of the front diff, driveshafts, axles, centre diff will easily add 15% to the weight of the car.
Remember too that the front suspension is set up completely differently on front wheel drive cars to compensate for torque-steer. That may prevent you from tuning the suspension for optimum handling.
If you opt for RWD you will need a locking spool to replace the centre diff. I have found this impossible to track down for a 6 speed box (5 spd 2WD adaptors ar available) & would like to know if you have found / can find a source?
RE: How To - Transmission Re-Design
You can't just get a differential that "rotates in the opposite direction." As Mike was trying to say, you need to flip the ring gear from one side to the other. The pinion still turns the same direction, but the ring gear would turn the opposite way. This would require a complete one-off gear set (big $$$). And looking at the front differential of the WRX the pinion is not on the same axis as the ring gear, so even if you flipped the ring gear to the other side the geometry would be terrible.
http:
ISZ
RE: How To - Transmission Re-Design
The diff part per se, contained within the ring gear, generally doesn't care about the direction of rotation.
The ring gear generally does care, at least if it's a hypoid. Because of the non-intersecting centers, the teeth on both ring and pinion are asymmetrical in several ways.
In a plane that's transverse to the pinion axis, the ring gear teeth look a little like buttress threads. The flattish face takes the high normal load. Reverse direction, and the sloping face gets the high load, which translates to high separating forces and extra scuffing.
Not quite similarly, the pinion has a preferred direction, too. In forward, much of the reaction force is directed along the pinion axis, where the larger tapered roller bearing deals with it. In reverse, the higher (for a given torque level) separating force also induces more bending in the pinion, which is not really designed for long duty that way. Or something like that. The geometry really makes my head hurt.
The point is, ring/pinion sets are optimized to transmit lots of torque in one direction for long periods of time, and not nearly as much torque in the reverse direction, for not nearly so long. So you can't just drive 'em backwards; they'll howl and break.
It gets worse; they're hard to make; your corner machine shop can't make an opposite hand set from a sample. Even if they could, you'd need opposite hand housings, etc.
This exercise will cost more than buying your friend's STi, and even if you manage to get the drivetrain like you want it, the odds are against you getting the rest of the car right. If you like the car, just buy it.
Mike Halloran
Pembroke Pines, FL, USA
RE: How To - Transmission Re-Design
http://
To Mike and the other people that have offered valuable insights, thanks for your comments, I think I'll be going RWD which will make it easier in many respects (and cheaper too!).
Now I'm thinking porsche G50 transaxle, does that sound like a good prospect or do you guys have other recommendations?
I'm expecting the engine to be making mountains of torque and power, as I'm intending to run a lot of boost pressure. So the transaxle has to be a strong one!
RE: How To - Transmission Re-Design
I have a gearcutting company in NZ who will make a spool to my details. (I'm in Thailand, no professional machine shops here) On my last visit I took them the centre diff, but they require the 'male' splines to ensure the fit. I'm not looking forward to pulling the gearbox apart when I'm supposed to be putting it in the chassis!
I also contacted Modena Engineering www.modenaengineering.com.au
& they say 'yes, we do them all the time' but I'm 99% sure they are talking about a rear-wheel conversion so I asked them to clarify - that was back in September & I'm still waiting.
Braemar did send some photos of the gear-shift rod on the Saker car they build. That's another story you'll need to solve at some point when the engine's between you & your gearbox!
RE: How To - Transmission Re-Design
RE: How To - Transmission Re-Design
There is oil in a gearbox, correct? Is it gravity controlled?
RE: How To - Transmission Re-Design
The oil fill and drain holes end up in the wrong place but its not an insurmountable probem.
Regards
Pat
See FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies for tips on use of eng-tips by professional engineers &
http://eng-tips.com/market.cfm
for site rules
RE: How To - Transmission Re-Design
Any advice, pointers, or links to examples or guides, that can prove useful to me?
RE: How To - Transmission Re-Design
See this thread, it seems I'm not the first to explore this option:
ht
RE: How To - Transmission Re-Design
The reason I suggested it is that I vaguely recall that some early racing transaxles were built into VW transaxle cases, and the whole box mounted 180° around and upside down for mid engine use. I think one of the early Hewland boxes might have been like this?
RE: How To - Transmission Re-Design
My advice is free, it's worth at least what you pay!
RE: How To - Transmission Re-Design
RE: How To - Transmission Re-Design
Bill
--------------------
"Why not the best?"
Jimmy Carter
RE: How To - Transmission Re-Design
RE: How To - Transmission Re-Design
http:/