×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Liquid Limit Test

Liquid Limit Test

Liquid Limit Test

(OP)
Can we determine liquid limit of a soil sample without going through so many trials as in Casagrande test?

RE: Liquid Limit Test

Yes,  blow counts between 18 and 29 can be correlated to a 25 blow moisture.

RE: Liquid Limit Test

(OP)
You mean,it need not necessarily 25 but between 18 and 29 blow counts can represent LL? or any chart you can correlate the LL for blow counts other than 25.

RE: Liquid Limit Test

One point calculation:
LL= W (N/25)<0.12  (between 15 and 30 blows)

RE: Liquid Limit Test

I am no soils engineer, but none of this makes sense to me.  Direct correlation of boring blow count with Atterberg limits?  Perhaps one of our geotech gurus can sort out what these guys are saying.

RE: Liquid Limit Test

hokie66 - I know you understand it is the blow count of an Atterberg limit "cup" wink -- not from the SPT . . .

RE: Liquid Limit Test

Thanks, BigH.  As I remember, my soils prof. called those taps rather than blows.  Oh well.

RE: Liquid Limit Test

(OP)
Civilperson-what are you talking about.LL is the water content of the sample(of Casagrande cup) at which a 13mm grove takes 25 blows to close up.Therefore,you need to try many times till you get that value.

RE: Liquid Limit Test

gemeda,

What civilperson is saying is that you run the test until you get between 15 and 30 blows (or taps).  Then use the formula he gave.  The formula corrects to 25.  If you get exactly 25 blows, then there is no need to correct.

Example:

You put your sample in the cup and obtain 27 blows, after which you put the sample into the oven and obtain a 35.7% m.c.  Then, your results would be as follows:

 LL = 35.7 x (27/25)^0.121 = 36.03 (or LL = 36).

civilperson uses a range from 15 to 35.  We limit our range between 21 and 29.  Some use 22 to 28 as a range in which they will use the above to correct to 25.

Hope this helps.

RE: Liquid Limit Test

Consider two or three trials.  For a moisture content of 15 percent it takes 29 blows (taps) to close up the groove.  For a moisture content of 25 percent it takes 21 blows. If you make a plot of blows v. moisture content you can straight line the data and see the liquid limit (i.e., moisture content for 25 blows would be 25 percent (i.e., LL=25).  For our lab, we usually run three trials just to see whether there is actually a straight line.  Rarely do all three line up, so we draw the best fit.

Hope this helps.

f-d

¡papá gordo ain't no madre flaca!

RE: Liquid Limit Test

There is two methods to determine the Liquid Limit:
1) Multiple trials with number of taps/blows at both below and above 25 with a curve fit or average.
2) AASHTO method of one trial with numerical adjustment to equal moisture at 25 taps/blows.

RE: Liquid Limit Test

(OP)
lovethecold and civilperson-thank you for your explanaton.
 

RE: Liquid Limit Test

We only do one trial.  I am wondering how many folks are like fattad and do three trials?  Usually for us we do the test just so there is a test to show that a soil is fat or lean.  Rarely is there a soil that is borderline.

Would the three point method be primarily for soils that are borderline?  Or for all types?

RE: Liquid Limit Test


We do multiple trials because you get better results and it's easy.  Come on, it's mud pies for grownups!   Once the mud is made, the time for extra taps and taring out weight cups isn't that hard.

f-d

¡papá gordo ain't no madre flaca!

RE: Liquid Limit Test

It also depends on the purpose of the test - to simply state "fat" or "lean" clay - it is not that important I agree from a practical aspect - for the most part a percent or two or even more will not change the 'fat' or 'lean' notation.  But if you are wanting to develop, say, local correlations with triaxial tests, it is important to be as accurate as you can.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources