×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Boiler Efficiency
2

Boiler Efficiency

Boiler Efficiency

(OP)
Our boiler is burning very inefficiently.  I have modelled our system with SSAT software for Excel and made my own calculations and I get the same results.

We have a 20,000lb/hr fire tube boiler.  We burn Natural Gas.  On average our the facility only draws 6,000lb/hr steam at 140psi.  I have calculated our fuel to steam efficiency at ~60%.  I assumed 1030BTU/CF of N.G.  

Would the low load account for the low efficiency of the boiler?  

Is there any other way to increase our efficiency other than buying a smaller boiler?  

I have checked the traps, looked for leaks.

Currently we do not have condensate return, actually you'll love this we pump our condensate into our cooling water system.   

I would like to hear some suggestions we could make to increase efficiency.

Thank you
 

RE: Boiler Efficiency

Think of the boiler as the engine in your car. Many things affect the overall efficiency of your car besides the engine, right? The transmission, the aerodynamics of the body, even the tire pressure. The condensate being returned or not, will have NO effect on boiler efficiency. It WILL affect how much fuel you have to put into the boiler, though. You need to make the distinction between overall plant efficiency, and boiler efficiency. They are NOT the same thing. Do not unfairly blame the boiler for problems elsewhere in the plant.

Remember that the boiler cannot count a "running start" from anything. The biggest player is normally feedwater temperature. Discount the heat in the feedwater from the heat in the steam leaving the boiler. The next thing to be considered is the steam meter on the boiler. Averages don't matter. You need an accurate measurement of the steam produced over (typically) 24 hours, counted against the fuel input to the boiler over the same time period. Your gas meter does JUST the boiler, right? Make sure. Your steam meter on the boiler is correctly sized, and PRESSURE COMPENSATED, right? Make sure. (I'll bet it's NOT - very few are.) How's the water treatment? Do you have a nasty stack temperature, like 700*F? Maybe your boiler is scaled-up.

RE: Boiler Efficiency

sounds like you need an economizer.

reducing  final end gas temperature to the stack will increase the boiler efficiency. Also, installing a better burner that  can run at a lower excess iar would also improve efficiency. Finally , installing an air heater would also do the trick. In other words, you have to spend money in order to save money.

RE: Boiler Efficiency

What are the O2 levels in flue gas and boiler flue gas exit temperatures at both 6000 and 20000lb/hour.

Regards,

athomas236

RE: Boiler Efficiency

(OP)
Some more info:
I will find out if our flow meter is pressure compensated, it is the original flow meter installed in 1997 with the boilers and no one has info on it here.

Also my calculations are not based on a single data point I have used several months of cumulative readings to calculate these figures.  Both the Steam flow meter and the Natural Gas flow meter have totalizers.  

Feed water temperature is ~60F.  We are in the PNW.  Ambient temperature is above 40F even in the winter.
We do have an economizer and the final stack temp. is ~290F.  Our economizer is used to heat the feedwater before it enters the deaerator

The water is de-min and well treated, we open the boilers every year for an inspection and there is very little to no buildup.

O2% is 6.7% as tested May 2008 during an average load.  I cannot provide O2% at max load because we never get there.  The highest we have ever seen is 14,000lb/hr draw and it was a one time spike.

Also in case this is important I was told our boilers are 15,000lb/hr production steam with a 20,100lb/hr max process heating.  They are Cleaver Brooks CBLE boilers.  We have 2 and run 1 at a time.

Thank you for the help.  



 

RE: Boiler Efficiency

My money is on oversized steam meters that don't have pressure compensation.

RE: Boiler Efficiency

(OP)
I cannot find any info for my steam meter.  So I have also looked into water usage by the boilers.  We have a totalizer on this meter as well.  Assuming 1 pound of liquid water will make 1 pound of steam, I am still burning far to much Natural Gas.  Actually I am still at my fuel to steam efficiency of 60%. I have double checked all my calculations with the SSAT software and I get the same results.

Will a low load on the boiler decrease its efficiency?  I assume it does.   

RE: Boiler Efficiency

6% O2 at the stack can be improved upon- shop around for a better burner that can run down to lowest  O2 ( 1-2%) on natural gas at full load- this would require reliable O2 monitors in the stack and other modifications suchas a controllable combustion air flow, etc. If you are in the US, the newer burners have better NOx perforamcne and you can realize an environmental bonus - helps with air permit renewals.

efficiency drops a bit as load drops because (a) radiation loss as a fraction of heat input will increase (b) higher excess air ( or higher O2) due to limited turndown of the burner or fd fan. The best way to reduce this part load loss is to upgrade the burners and combustion air control.
 

RE: Boiler Efficiency

Murdul,

Do you also have data for blow down and blow off flows?
You have demin make-up water, but for others using the 'once-thru' water with more solids content of the boiler feedwater, some boilers have as much as 25% blowdown.  It could be a significant part of the reduction of your plant efficiency, even more during low demand flow. (Assumed timer fixed cycling of bottom blow off.)   

RE: Boiler Efficiency

Firetube boilers without economizers, airpreheaters, and superheaters are not that efficient.  In older FT boilers,if you got 60% it was consider normal; with modern ones 70 to 75% would be normal.

RE: Boiler Efficiency

If you can't hit 80% boiler efficiency, there's something wrong.

The effect of economizers, air preheaters, etc must be discounted when calculating BOILER efficiency. Boilers cannot count any "running start".

RE: Boiler Efficiency

I agree with davefitz except I would use the word "downsize" in his sentence recommending 'upgrade'.  You have a boiler that is probably capable of operating at or near 80% efficiency at 20,000 lb/hr when the firing temperatures (radiation heat transfer in the fire tube) and gas flows (goes to reynolds numbers and heat transfer coefficients) in the tube banks are at their design conditions.  You are operating the boiler well below design conditions and the part load efficiencies are never as good as full load efficiency for this type of equipment.  Your 02 reading indicates this but it may be impossible to get the burner tuned to produce optimum O2 levels at reduced operation.

A burner rated for some safe margin above, but still near to your 6000 lb/hr, will operate at its sweet point and will be able to produce optimal O2 levels at your steaming conditions.  Do some calculations.  Your efficiency gain may have the ROI needed to justify the change.

rmw

RE: Boiler Efficiency

maybe your efficiency calc is off. Some simplifed efficiency calcs for small fire tube boilers assume the inlet fluid is water at 212 F- in your case it is at 60 F. Try using the asme ptc 4.0 calcs, if your using a simplified calc.

RE: Boiler Efficiency

Excellent point by davefitz.  I have never seen a firetube boiler that wasn't rated "from and at" 212F (100C).  But that said, the O2 reading is very revealing as well.  If you have the capability to measure CO, you might check that too.  Returning to my diatribe about the burner above, the type of burner used on firetube boilers depend on air velocity through the burner throat for proper mixing of the fuel with the combustion air and at reduced loads the air velocity isn't high enough to get good mixing and good combustion.  So while you have high O2, it is still possible to have some CO which would indicate what I just said.

rmw

RE: Boiler Efficiency

(OP)
Thank you for all your replies.  I will investigate my options for burners.  

Is the option of installing a new burner a viable alternative to buying a new boiler?  Meaning we can turn a 20,000lb/hr boiler into a 10,000lb/hr boiler simply by changing burners.  Wouldn't the size of the boiler affect performance?  

As far as blowdown we blowdown 2%.

RE: Boiler Efficiency

I dunno, Murdul - I've seen lots of work done on lots of boilers in the name of improving efficiency. A whole lot of it was wasted because everybody was flying blind. There were no reliable steam flow/totalizer readings. Having boilers run without accurate steam meters is like having a fleet of vehicles with no functioning odometers.

Can you downfire your boilers? Sure. Will it change the surface area? No. Can you actually calculate a payback? No. You can't. You've got no "odometer" reading that means anything. Without an accurate steam meter reading, you're missing half of the values necessary to figure boiler efficiency. And that's just a cold hard fact.

Good luck. I think you're going to need it.

RE: Boiler Efficiency

Assuming an infinite bank account so that you can go out and buy sophisticated instrumentation as TBP recommends, to answer your question, downsizing the burner will just make your burner more efficient, minimizing your losses there.  That said, your boiler was designed and the components such as furnace tubes and boiler tubes wer sized to operate at its design capacity.  At that condition, the fire tube is full of fire and a certain amount of radiation (not negligible) as well as convection heat transfer occurs there.  As the gasses exit the furnace tube and make their first pass, at design conditions there is a specific gas flow and temperature and the heat transfer in the tube bank passes is calculated on the predication that the mass flow of gas, (determines tube velocities) and temperatures at the various points along the flow path are present.  Any heat transfer in the tubesheets is considered negligable, but some does occur there in real life.

If you downsize the burner, you will be converting all the gas (or whatever the fuel) to energy with minimal combustion losses, so you will have done all you can do there, but the overall mass flow will naturally be reduced, reducing the gas velocities in the tubes and who knows what the temperature profiles will look like.  There will be less radiation heat transfer in the furnace tube as well.

But, you will be about the best you can be.  You will have optimum combustion, but less than optimal heat transfer rates in the tube sections.  The only to conquer that is to go find some load to put on it.

That is about all I can tell you about it.  I have had to do what you are faced with and I just made the best of it with what I had to work with.

rmw

RE: Boiler Efficiency

Could you be burning lean because of an incorrect reading from your O2 sensor?  I was just on a site where the O2 sensor wasn't calibrated properly for a solid fuel fired system.

Not sure that would cause such a significant efficiency drop though.

RE: Boiler Efficiency

Sorry, burning rich... not lean.

RE: Boiler Efficiency

rmw - An "infinite bank account" for a 3" or 4" vortex shedding meter, with pressure compensation? C'mon...  

RE: Boiler Efficiency

TBP, that was an euphamistic way of saying 'if you can get funds' because I have found that it is hard to get the accountants to agree to what is needed for technical reasons.

I recommend the meter and the calibration of the current instrumentation, e.g. O2 meter, as well as other improvements, but I can just picture the reaction of those that control the purse strings.

My point was to move to the fixes and the limiting parameters whether or not they turned loose of the funds to buy the needed instrumentation.

rmw

RE: Boiler Efficiency

I am sure that if you contact the boiler OEm or the various burner mfr's , you will find that there are new burners developed specifically of the California market that have wide turndown, ultra low Nox, and very low excess air requirements. In the case of small industrila boilers, the same techmology that is ued to lower Nox will also yield higher boiler efficiency due to lower excess air operation.

RE: Boiler Efficiency

Here are some statistics for FT boilers.  I am assuming that you have a Scotch Marine type which is probably the most efficient of all  the 5 types of FT boilers.
 Steaming rates: 5 to 7 lbs/hr per ft^2 of heating surface
               : should not exceed the 7 lbs/hr-ft^2
 Efficiency :75% to 80%
  (steam generation to fuel input to boiler)
  (w/o econmizer,superheater and air preheater)  
You can easily determine the burner max firing rate by using the above stats.   

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources