×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Guided Wave Radar Interface

Guided Wave Radar Interface

Guided Wave Radar Interface

(OP)
Hi everyone, I have a couple of questions on GWR.
Has anyone used Guided Wave Radar to measure interface  where the Upper level is acidic water and the lower level Hydrocarbon. My intuition tells me the radar will not be able to penetrate the highly conductive water layer, am I correct?
Where you have an  emulsion at the interface would you get a good echo?
We normally use bubhle tubes for this application but a new customer is asking for radar.
Personaly I think displacer type transmitters would work better, any thoughts on that type?

Thanks & Regards
Roy

RE: Guided Wave Radar Interface

Is the water layer always less than some amount? Like a few inches?  That might allow good results with GWR.

BTW why is the water floating ON TOP of the oil?  Isn't that backwards?

Keith Cress
kcress - http://www.flaminsystems.com

RE: Guided Wave Radar Interface

(OP)
Hi Keith,
                No the water could be up to 1 meter deep (4 meter vessel).
This particular hydrocarbon has an SG  over 1.1, so no it's below the acidic water. Occasional stickiness rules out anything in contact e.g. magnrtorestrictive float.
thanks
Roy

RE: Guided Wave Radar Interface

Most TDR/GWR require the bottom fluid to have at least 10 times higher dielectric constant than top fluid.

Stick w/ displacer or magnetostrictive.

RE: Guided Wave Radar Interface

(OP)
Keith, Cat,
             Thanks for your response. I am leaning towards a displacer, I have ruled out magneto-restrictive as that relies on a float sliding on a rod. Our process can be sticky at times.
We currently use bubble tubes but client has asked for GWR, I have my doubts but haven't radar enough to get a good feel for it's limitation.
Any more suggestions?
Regards
Roy

RE: Guided Wave Radar Interface

Talk to the supplier. They'll have to warranty it anyway

<<A good friend will bail you out of jail, but a true friend
will be sitting beside you saying " Damn that was fun!" - Unknown>>

RE: Guided Wave Radar Interface

(OP)
Unotec, Yes but a warranty isn't much good when you are in a startup situation and everyone is asking you why your level transmitter is holding everyone up.
Agreed, if it's a one off it's OK but many times on a large project it could be 6 months between purchase and startup.
Thanks
Roy

RE: Guided Wave Radar Interface

Yes but, unless you're an expert on these units, your best bet is to talk to a couple suppliers, get their technical input and then do your own evaluation.
That's what I usually do with equipment I know what it does and how it works but I am not an expert in (mainly all instrumentation)

<<A good friend will bail you out of jail, but a true friend
will be sitting beside you saying " Damn that was fun!" - Unknown>>

RE: Guided Wave Radar Interface

(OP)
Hi Guys,
               Thanks for the response so far. I did some digging and found out the following.
Upper Fluid
Acidic Water Dielelctric constant 55 - 80,   SG 0.997  Conductivity > 100 mS/cm3
Lower Fluid
Nitrobenzene Dielectric constant 20 - 25    SG 1.2   mS/cm.  Conductivity 0.005 ms/cm3

The fluid is very nasty, Glass, Teflon & Tantalum are about the only things that stand up.
Regards
Roy

RE: Guided Wave Radar Interface

Yeah indeed but it smells really cool.

With those radically different conductivities I wonder if you couldn't use two conductive rods and a top float to accurately calculate both depths.

Be a science project though.

Keith Cress
kcress - http://www.flaminsystems.com

RE: Guided Wave Radar Interface

(OP)
Keith,
           Yes, I have been promoting the idea of using electrode-less conductivity for a couple of the interface point level applications.
Hope to try it out in our lab.
Roy

RE: Guided Wave Radar Interface

"Electrode-less conductivity for interface"

What's that look like?   
Dan

RE: Guided Wave Radar Interface

(OP)
Danw2,
             I'm not sure if you were asking how you measure conductivity  see attached
http://www.omega.com/GREEN/pdf/CONDUCTIVITY_REF.pdf
OR
how you would measure interface.
Obviously as the interface from a highly conductive water based solution is replaced by an organic low conductive solution the output will change accordingly. I assume that when the solution is half way or in an emulsion the probe output should also reflect that. I haven't had the chance to try it out.
Roy

RE: Guided Wave Radar Interface

Either exposed wetted electrode or torroidal conductivity is a 'point' measurement, as opposed to a continuous measurement.

I'm trying to figure out how one uses one or two conductivity measurements, presumably at some fixed elevation 'point', to see or determine a change in interface level.

I'm assuming that the conductivities remain constant, even if the interface level changes.  Is that correct?

Or is the conductivity of one of the media changing which results in a change of interface level?

RE: Guided Wave Radar Interface

(OP)
No, the probe would be located at the interface level. In this case if the level went up the conductive acidic water would be replaced by low conductivity organic.
I'm just not sure what happens when the interface is half way. I don't expect a liner relationship.
Likewise i'm not sure what the response to an emulsion would be.
Regards
Roy

RE: Guided Wave Radar Interface

I've not heard good things about using GWR when there's an emulsion pad of any great thickness.

To get round the problem of the fluids being the wrong way up you could always stick the probe in from the bottom! Only problem would be draining the entire tank contents if you needed to change it...

I'm looking at retrofitting a capactive probe into a separator at the moment. E & H do one and so do Siemens. Anyone heard any reports - good or bad?

Fluids are sour gas, 35deg API oil and brackish produced water at about 60C. Glass lined vessel so would have to include a ground tube.

RE: Guided Wave Radar Interface

In my refinery apprentice years both engineers and technicians held capacitance level instruments in low esteem.  I am a fan of GWR and avoid capacitace level instruments.  However, I would assure that the GWR application was solid before going that direction.  And don't forget about the business that salemen are in.

RE: Guided Wave Radar Interface

(OP)
Thank-youi all for your response'
I have concluded that GWR should work provided there is a clean interface (no emulsion layer) and the bottom layer dielectric constant is significantly higher than the upper level.
For interface where the upper fluid has the higher dielectric constant I will recommend a magnetorestrictive type.
As I mentioned earlier we normally do this with differential bubble tubes, that works well but the client wants to use something a bit more sexy.
Regards
Roy

RE: Guided Wave Radar Interface

I have a couple of questions about the bubble tubes roydm was talking about...

What gas do you use? (N2? Process Hydrocarbon Gas? Air would be a bad idea!)

How do you compensate for a pressurised tank?

Thx - Loki.

RE: Guided Wave Radar Interface

(OP)
Yes, air would be bad, we use Nitrogen.
Both bubble tubes are below the surface, each has it's own purge supply, both HP & LP see the vessel pressure.
We can measure interface or density.
Roy

RE: Guided Wave Radar Interface

OK Cheers.

Is it a packed vessel or do you compensate for overall level?

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources