×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Effect of second pump in the line on NPSHr

Effect of second pump in the line on NPSHr

Effect of second pump in the line on NPSHr

(OP)
Hello,
I have a water system with a huge NPSHr, compared to the NPSHa. I can't do much about the NPSHa, so i need to somehow reduce my NPSHr. I'm wondering what the effect would be on the NPSHr of adding a second pump in the line, in serie with the first one, somewhere halfway the end.
Any thoughts?

Thanks,
M.

Process - Piping
ing - EiT

RE: Effect of second pump in the line on NPSHr

We are going to need more information to give you an accurate answer.  

If I were you I would add another pump, but make sure you run it at 1750rpm.  Keep in mind:  In series the flow stays the same, and the TDH stacks.

I would say you are better off replaceing what you have with a 1750rpm multistage pump, or a vertical can pump if you are really hurting for NPSHa.

RE: Effect of second pump in the line on NPSHr

More info please.
A question for you, how can you have a water system with a huge NPSHr? - NPSHr is a pump requirement not a system requirement, do you mean that the pump NPSHr exceeds the NPSHa, if this is the case then you need to select a pump with a  NPSHr lower than the NPSHa.    

RE: Effect of second pump in the line on NPSHr

except for replacing the pump i dont think you can change the NPSHr for a given pump.

Best regards

Morten

RE: Effect of second pump in the line on NPSHr

Reduce the specific speed & suction specific speed
by reducing flow, or speed or increasing head.

http://www.mcnallyinstitute.com/07-html/7-03.html
http://www.gouldspumps.com/cpf_0008.html
http://www.gouldspumps.com/cpf_0008.html

**********************
"Pumping accounts for 20% of the world's energy used by electric motors and 25% to 50% of the total electrical energy usage in certain industrial facilities." - DOE statistic  (Note: Make that 99.99% for pipeline companies) http://virtualpipeline.spaces.live.com/

RE: Effect of second pump in the line on NPSHr

NPSHr is a function of the pump design and little can be done to alter it beyond the design stage. NPSHa is system related and usually there are some measures to take to improve the value. Pumps in series won't solve the issue, like GaTech said. Running pumps in parallel can solve NPSH issues in a particular system since you are utilizing half of the available value, more or less. Setting that configuration up correctly so it operates reliably is a whole new ball of wax and could be a separate thread on it's own.

RE: Effect of second pump in the line on NPSHr


"Running pumps in parallel can solve NPSH issues in a particular system since you are utilizing half of the available value, more or less."

Its not clear how you would be using half of "the available value".  What available value, NPSHa?  Would you then be running 2 pumps at half flow?  

Then why just not run one pump with a control valve to cut back on flow and increase the NPSHa in the suction line?

**********************
"Pumping accounts for 20% of the world's energy used by electric motors and 25% to 50% of the total electrical energy usage in certain industrial facilities." - DOE statistic  (Note: Make that 99.99% for pipeline companies) http://virtualpipeline.spaces.live.com/

RE: Effect of second pump in the line on NPSHr

"Then why just not run one pump with a control valve to cut back on flow and increase the NPSHa in the suction line?" - BigInch

This sounds possible, but ineffecient, correct?  If you were to replace the current pump, you might as well put in something that will do the job.

RE: Effect of second pump in the line on NPSHr

A little inefficency is better than NPSH cavitation or adding a second pump so they can both run at half speed.

Of course replacing the pump with the proper model is best, but that option wasn't part of the question.  

**********************
"Pumping accounts for 20% of the world's energy used by electric motors and 25% to 50% of the total electrical energy usage in certain industrial facilities." - DOE statistic  (Note: Make that 99.99% for pipeline companies) http://virtualpipeline.spaces.live.com/

RE: Effect of second pump in the line on NPSHr

(OP)
thanks for all the replies. I think the formulation of my problem was unclear.

I'm trying to model a system in Pipeflo. Ultra Pure Water system, closed loop. I have a source tank with water level at 10m.  System requires a 80m3/h flow. Piping is PVDF, 225 mm. Larger pipes are not ok. Required head is about 15 m.

The program tells me the NSPHa is not sufficient. For a good NSPHa, i need to raise the level in the tank to 35 m. For obvious reasons, the level is limited to 10 m.
Fluid velocity: 1.5 m/s (which is too low actually)

At this point, i don't have a pump model. That's what i'm trying ot find out with this program, but it get stuck because of the NPSHa. Maybe a 2nd pump in serie would help, but Pipeflo doesn't like that option..
 

Process - Piping
ing - EiT

RE: Effect of second pump in the line on NPSHr

I don't use pipeflo, but I'm curious about how it knows you have insufficient NPSH, if you don't have a pump model yet.

You should be able to do that easily with a 125-80-200 pump, needing approx 1.7m NPSH.

Perhaps you have too much suction piping/losses, and you run out of NPSH before the pump....where is your pump located in relation to the supply tank?  What temperature is the water?

RE: Effect of second pump in the line on NPSHr

(OP)
Thanks Tenpenny.

When i launch a calculation, i get an error message at the pump, that won't go away until i raise the level in the tank to 35m. Tank and pump are close together, so the solution is not there. Normal conditons for water.

How did you come up with 1.7m NPSH?

Process - Piping
ing - EiT

RE: Effect of second pump in the line on NPSHr

A second pump in series IS NOT the answer.  It will do nothing except raise your head delivered to the system.  How will that help your suction??????


Reduce the specific speed & suction specific speed
by reducing flow, or speed or increasing head.


Stop using pipeflo for awhile and start reading the references I gave you.

**********************
"Pumping accounts for 20% of the world's energy used by electric motors and 25% to 50% of the total electrical energy usage in certain industrial facilities." - DOE statistic  (Note: Make that 99.99% for pipeline companies) http://virtualpipeline.spaces.live.com/

RE: Effect of second pump in the line on NPSHr

I agree with BigInch.  Obviously there is something wrong with the software, or how your setting up the problem.  It sounds to me like you need to add the pump model first because your software is not taking the pump into account.  If you lift the tank 35 meters, then you wouldnt need a pump.  You can just Gravity Feed! :)

Do it the old school way.

RE: Effect of second pump in the line on NPSHr

Pipeline:

I ran your 80m3/h at 15 m head through a pump sizing program, it came up with lots of options that require 1 to 2 m NPSH.

There's obviously something a bit wacky with the way the problem is set up, or the way the system is calculating.

RE: Effect of second pump in the line on NPSHr

Maybe I misunderstood and you want to add a booster pump into the suction line?  Is that what you were trying to say?

**********************
"Pumping accounts for 20% of the world's energy used by electric motors and 25% to 50% of the total electrical energy usage in certain industrial facilities." - DOE statistic  (Note: Make that 99.99% for pipeline companies) http://virtualpipeline.spaces.live.com/

RE: Effect of second pump in the line on NPSHr

Go back to basics and calculate the system loss/NPSHa with a sheet of paper, a penci, a set of friction loss tables and NPSH = Ha-Hvpa (+/-) Hst - Hfs - no error messages if you do.  

RE: Effect of second pump in the line on NPSHr

A larger, second pump, running at a slower speed will have a lower NPSHR and should be selected to satisfy your available suction conditions. If you install this upstream of the existing pump, and perhaps adjust the existing pump impeller diameter or speed to preserve the combined TDH , you should be able to achieve your objective.
However it sounds as if your Pipeflo program or the defaults or inputs are bad. Suggest you calculate by hand, with simplifications if necessary, this might help some insight into whats going wrong.

Cheers

Steve

RE: Effect of second pump in the line on NPSHr

(OP)
Thanks you all. There's gotta be something wrong, not with the program, i'm not that arrogant lol, but with my input.

I did a test with a very short line, and still had the same issue. So i figure something's wrong in the design settings, material specs, estimated pressure loss in equipment etc...

Biginch, i did check your references. Thanks. And yes, a booster pump is a possibility. I'm not familiar with these, tho, so i'll need to investigate that as well.

I realise this post is probably not in the right forum... sorry about that..

Process - Piping
ing - EiT

RE: Effect of second pump in the line on NPSHr

(OP)
yup, there it is: i picked the wrong fluid for my system: vinyl chloride instead of water!! It was in front of me the whole time! 3eyes
 

Process - Piping
ing - EiT

RE: Effect of second pump in the line on NPSHr

Attaboy!

Bet you wouldn't have done that if you wern't trying to use a program first.

**********************
"Pumping accounts for 20% of the world's energy used by electric motors and 25% to 50% of the total electrical energy usage in certain industrial facilities." - DOE statistic  (Note: Make that 99.99% for pipeline companies) http://virtualpipeline.spaces.live.com/

RE: Effect of second pump in the line on NPSHr

Very difficult to make that mistake with my simplified method of pencil and paper banghead.

RE: Effect of second pump in the line on NPSHr

GIGO

Ted

RE: Effect of second pump in the line on NPSHr

(OP)
yeeaah, but now i have my 600 m long system running nice and smoothly, and i have a nice representation of the system as well. And a full report. And now i can move on and start tweaking the system.

Process - Piping
ing - EiT

RE: Effect of second pump in the line on NPSHr

Try not to lower the NPSHa this time, OK?  smile

**********************
"Pumping accounts for 20% of the world's energy used by electric motors and 25-50% of the total electrical energy usage in certain industrial facilities."-DOE statistic (Note: Make that 99% for pipeline companies) http://virtualpipeline.spaces.live.com/

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources