×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

random vibration fatigue - normal mode method

random vibration fatigue - normal mode method

random vibration fatigue - normal mode method

(OP)
All of the literature available I've found on random vibration fatigue assumes the existence of a stress response PSD. This is required for the many methods that estimate fatigue life of broadband vibration response (i.e. Dirlik).

The FEA package I use, applies the Normal Mode Method to approximate the response of a structure to random vibration. In other words, the RMS response of the structure at each mode is calculated. So, instead of an output PSD, there is a sort of 'discrete frequency response' with an RMS stress value for each modal frequency. For example:

fn (Hz) RMS sigma_VM (ksi)
------- ----------------------
10 3
25 9
50 2
150 1

Given this information how do I ...

- Convert this to a PSD?
--> For example, one way might be to assume some constant bandwidth (del_f) to set the stess PSD value to RMS^2/(del_f). This would make the stress response PSD look like a series of bars of constant bandwidth.

OR

- Apply Miner's rule directly to estimate fatigue life?


Thanks,
Ryan

RE: random vibration fatigue - normal mode method

(OP)
Well, it seems to me that of the few people with random vibration experience, they all use FEA software packages that use the 'Direct Method' to solve for the response in terms of a PSD.

I use ALGOR which uses the 'Normal Mode Method' which approximates the response as the sum of modal responses.

I came up with a time domain approximation method that avoids converting the discrete response data to a PSD. The time domain of the response is modeled as the sum of sine functions with one sinusoid for each natural frequency.

X(t) = sum{ A_k * sin(w_k*t) }
    k = 1 to n where n is the # of modes
    w_k is the natural frequnecy at the kth mode
    A_k is the amplitude of the response.
    The amplitude A_k of each mode is randomly varied throughout time according to the Rayleigh distribution.

After X(t) is simulated, the fatigue life can be calculated using rainflow cycle counting methods. This method is exact for the narrowband case (1 modal response) and matches up well with sharply bi-modal PSDs.
 

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources