×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

MDEA absorber flash gas

MDEA absorber flash gas

MDEA absorber flash gas

(OP)
We have an MDEA absorber to remove CO2/H2S in a natural gas stream. The MDEA co-absorbs a small amount of hydrocarbons in the absorber that is mostly flashed off from the rich solvent in the flash column.   The normal flash gas from the flash column is, say, 1000 Nm3/h, based on a natural gas feed flowrate of 1000 kNm3/h.  

The question if is natural gas feed stream is reduced to zero, does the flash gas flowrate stay about the same (1000 Nm3/h), assuming the lean solvent rate to the absorber stays the same?   According to our process licensor, the flash gas rate should stay about the same (ie. the lean solvent will constinue to abosrb the same amount of hydrocarbons from the feed gas).    However, I have my doubts as I would expect the mass transfer rate to decrease substantially if the feed gas rate is reduced to zero.   
         

RE: MDEA absorber flash gas

I would tend to agree with your licensor. Let's make a little assumption for purposes of illustration. Let's say your natural gas is 100% methane, except for small quantities of CO2 and H2S that are normally removed by your process. When you stop the flow of natural gas to your Absorber, the gas that is "trapped" in the Absorber will rapidly be depleted of CO2 and H2S. Now you know that a small quantity of methane is normally absorbed by the lean solvent. Why would this quantity change? The gas in the Absorber is unchanged except for the removal of trace components, and this should not affect the absorption of methane. So the methane in your rich sorbent should not change, nor should the amount of methane flashed from the rich solvent.

RE: MDEA absorber flash gas

Flash gas rate may in fact go up ever so slightly.  Since the co-absorption of hydrocarbons is a function of partial pressure and solubility, rate of the primary gas is not a factor.  It is directly proportional to the circulation of the amine.  If the flow of gas is zero, we can assume that the solution has reached full equilibrium - hence the potential for a slight rise in flash gas volumes.

RE: MDEA absorber flash gas

(OP)
Djack, maddocks - thanks for the confirmation.    

RE: MDEA absorber flash gas

I've re-thought this and am thinking that once the CO2 and H2S has been removed, the flash gas rate will drop - the only remaining flash gas will be whatever is co-absorbed in the MDEA mixture.

RE: MDEA absorber flash gas

(OP)
We just recently put the unit in operation and compared the flash gas flow at zero feed gas flow verus ~30% feed gas flow (with same MDEA flow).   The flow of flash gas from the flash column overhead showed little difference.  So process licensor was correct.

RE: MDEA absorber flash gas

To clear up some misconceptions, the main reason bulk gas from the absorber ends up in the regenerator/stripper is due to physical entrapment in the solvent.  Amine solutions are notoriously foamy and gas pockets in the foamy liquid of at the bottom of the absorber will carry under to the regenerator/stripper. If the inlet gas distributor has downward facing slots, there may be additional agitation of the bottom holdup leading to even more carry-under.

RE: MDEA absorber flash gas

1) Your licensor say correct but it can not stay for last long, it happen only inteval of  the residence time or retention time.
2) After the feed gas stop longer than its retention time , the mass transfer will change ( in flow can not equal to out flow) , then your understanding is correct.
3) Normally eventhough thae gas stop but  lean amine still doing absorbtion since their still has gas in the column, but acid gas H2S/CO@ already reduce but metahne or orther gas can co-absorb and produce its off gas, the the rate/composition will change as your understanding.

 

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources