×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

EPA Hydrocarbon Test Anomally

EPA Hydrocarbon Test Anomally

EPA Hydrocarbon Test Anomally

(OP)
I just read in a motorcycle publication about EPA hydrocarbon emission results for motorcycle vs truck and they seem counterintuitive to me. Specifically, a BMW motorcycle getting 45mpg emitted hydrocarbons at a level of 1.5/mile and a Ford F-150 getting 15mpg emitted only 0.1/mile. How can this be? Is it somehow do to the BMW having more combustion events per mile,or something like that? Both vehicles were fuel injected, with catalytic converters.

RE: EPA Hydrocarbon Test Anomally

No, it is due to the extreme care and engineering that goes into the fuel system of a modern car, or truck.

The cat system may be a small part of it, but to achieve modern levels of HC emissions you need to address things like permeability of fuel tanks, and so on.

 

Cheers

Greg Locock

SIG:Please see FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips.

RE: EPA Hydrocarbon Test Anomally

Were those actual test results, or were they certification limits?

The standards for motorcycles are (for now) a lot less stringent than the standards for automobiles. The catalytic converters are designed to meet the standards in each case. There's no point using an expensive, really efficient catalytic converter when a cheaper but less efficient one will achieve compliance.

RE: EPA Hydrocarbon Test Anomally

(OP)
Brian--from my read of the article (and the fact that they are nice even numbers) those would have to be emission limits, rather than actual test results. But your explanation makes sense--the EPA limit is driving the results, not something inherent with the two vehicles. Greg-- how can fuel tank permeability enter into this? As I understand the EPA exhaust emission test procedures, the exhaust is bagged and analyzed. No way for stray fuel vapors to enter into this.

RE: EPA Hydrocarbon Test Anomally

There are evaporative as well as tailpipe emissions requirements for both types of vehicles.  My Triumph Speed Triple has a charcoal canister that feeds the intake to control evap emissions as well as air injection and exhaust catalyst for tail pipe emissions.  It sounds like the article was only talking tailpipe since the units are in gm/mile.

RE: EPA Hydrocarbon Test Anomally

Shrugs, I don't know how they measure it, but HC emissions consider all sources of HC in the vehicle (including, I vaguely remember the materials in the car itself).

 

Cheers

Greg Locock

SIG:Please see FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips.

RE: EPA Hydrocarbon Test Anomally

We did a shed test (the evaporative cycle) on a vehicle we were trying to get through EPA.  Our raw HC numbers were through the roof.  It turned out that the fuel hose we used was permeable (LPG, type 1 hose).  The actual engine out emissions were on target.

The shed test measures all evaporative emissions, including tires, interior, all fabrics, gas tank, etc.  I saw a Subaru that failed a shed test because the owner sent it through a detail shop first, where they sprayed the engine compartment and tires with a preservative.  The real stinker was the tire shine compound.

Franz

eng-tips, by professional engineers for professional engineers
Please see FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips Fora.
 

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources