Composite Beam Question
Composite Beam Question
(OP)
How wide does the concrete slab need to be over the edge beam to have full composite action?
When was the last time you drove down the highway without seeing a commercial truck hauling goods?
Download nowINTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS Come Join Us!Are you an
Engineering professional? Join Eng-Tips Forums!
*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail. Posting GuidelinesJobs |
|
RE: Composite Beam Question
1. 1/4 x span
2. Beam spacing c to c
3. 12 x slab thickness
Use the lower value of the three.
Hope this helps.
RE: Composite Beam Question
ThuSuperDore is asking about an edge beam.
My 1989 ASD says that shear connectors shall have at least 1 inch of lateral concrete cover.
DaveAtkins
RE: Composite Beam Question
RE: Composite Beam Question
A fully composite beam has enough shear connectors so that Sum(Qn) is at least as big as AsFy or 0.85f'cAc. For example, if Sum(Qn)/AsFy = 0.4, then it's 40% composite.
Like someone typed, there are limits on rib width, etc. for the situation to be valid at all. Check Section I3.2 of your 2005 AISC Spec. These do NOT tell you anything about whether a beam is fully composite.
RE: Composite Beam Question
OK...If it is considered that there is sufficient shear transfer between the steel and concrete, I beleive the code says that the limiting design value to be taken for full composite action must be the smaller of steel yielding or 85% of the concrete crushing limits. (However in a broader context, simply limiting the design value without regard to the overload failure mechanism might be considered unwise.)
I don't beleive either of these two strength limit states have anything to do with arriving at a "partial composite" percentage, as suggested in 27's post however. The AISC 9th edition Section I.4 states that partial composite action is determined by "q" times the number of connectors furnished between the point of maximum moment and the nearest point of zero moment, not the limiting strength of the two materials being joined.
My 4 sq.in. circle is blue.
RE: Composite Beam Question
I wasn't trying to say what was implied in your third paragraph. AsFy, 0.85f'cAc, and Sum(Qn) are just computed to set V' (talking 2005 AISC here, not 1989, which is very old when it comes to composite beam design). V' gives us what we need to figure out hte exact plastic stress distribution that's used to compute Mn.
I don't think of 0.85f'cAc and AsFy as "limit states," but just numbers that we use to help d the plastic stress distribution.
The real point was that the original question is invalid.
RE: Composite Beam Question
So if I have W12x26 beams and 4" slab with 3/4" dia studs, how much slab I need over the center of an edge beam?
I don't think it's an invalid question.
RE: Composite Beam Question
Keep in mind that I come from a generation that chooses to part with the green book only after rigor has set in. Not that there is anything wrong with LFRD. I consider myself to be enlightened in these times of change. In fact, some of my best friends are plastic.
You are quite correct about the original question though.
Thanks for the humor!
RE: Composite Beam Question
AISC Spec. Section I3.2d(6): "Shear connectors shall have at least 1 in. of lateral concrete cover, except..."
"So if I have W12x26 beams and 4" slab with 3/4" dia studs, how much slab I need over the center of an edge beam?"
The above section seems to answer this question, although I think I'd personally like to have more cover than that. This is usually not an issue because one would normally have the edge of slab at least to the edge of the W12x26 resulting in at least 3.25" lateral cover.
"I don't think it's an invalid question."
These questions are fine. The original question was invalid because it asked what cover results in fully-composite. Whether or not a beam is fully composite depends on the number of studs instead.