×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Alternative Torquing Sequences

Alternative Torquing Sequences

Alternative Torquing Sequences

(OP)
  I have learned a lot from these threads over the last few months and I recognise that experienced people do not rely on torque values alone for flange assembly, but I am going to do so.  Rating is Class 300, 24 inch, with an ultimate required torque supplied by my EPCM  QA/QC people of 1600 foot lbs.  Any leaks would be embarrassing rather than lethal, since duty is water.

Assuming I want to restrict myself to four passes with the torque wrench,  is there any benefit or potential consequences to using say,  300, 600, 1200, 1600  or alternatively  250, 500, 1000, 1600?  Any relevant comments or opinions welcome.

RE: Alternative Torquing Sequences

Refer to ASME PCC-1 - Table 2, which recommends:
1) Hand-tight (star-pattern)
2) 20%-30% of target torque (star-pattern)
3) 50%-70% of target torque (star-pattern)
4) 100% of target torque (star-pattern)
5) 100% of target torque (circular pattern)
6) Wait a minimum of 4 hours, and repeat 5) above.

That's actually a 3+ pass approach.  I would recommend that you purchase PCC-1 for all of the details.

RE: Alternative Torquing Sequences

(OP)
TG,  I had not overlooked your steps 5 and 6 , I was refferring to the initial 4 steps only.

However,your post summarizes my problem!!  50-70% is a range of 800- 1120. Surely  there must be some advice available from people who have done this in the field on a regular basis.
 

RE: Alternative Torquing Sequences


Hello miningman,

First: It's good to see you here and to know that your property hasn't gone on Care & Maintenance as so many others have!

Second: I promise not to mount my "Torque is Evil" pulpit winky smile

Quote:

...However,your post summarizes my problem!!  50-70% is a range of 800- 1120...

Indeed, it's frustrating! However, such a loose procedure is not to be unexpected in an uncontrolled process which is already fraught with so many unknowns. In the context of having to hope that the final preloads and their distribution is close to what's required, this range of 320 ft-lbs really isn't such a big deal; the joint's reliability is already based on a (granted, educated) wing and a prayer sad

Simply pick some torque values (pick the higher end of the scale) and tighten your bolts in three stages with a final two passes at 100%. Like you say, it's only water. If the flange leaks, tighten 'er up some more. If the leak stops, congrats! If not, get some new flanges (because the existing ones would have likely rotated) and try it again. If you're not too unlucky, the second attempt should work. If that one doesn't either, then you might wish to revisit your strategy and perhaps incorporate a bit more control into the process.

Good luck thumbsup2

* I've attached a file which might come in handy when trying to calculate bolt load, torque, elongation etc...

 

Ciao,

HevïGuy
www.heviitech.com

RE: Alternative Torquing Sequences


miningman,

You wouldn't happen to be pulling "the good stuff" out of the Carlin Trend, would you? If  so, I'll be there at one of the properties next week on a training contract and would be happy to meet with you before flying home.

Ciao,

HevïGuy
www.heviitech.com

RE: Alternative Torquing Sequences

(OP)
  Hevi ,  thanks for the suggestions and invitation ,  but no , Im based in Canada and only have peripheral knowledge of activities in Nevada.  

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources