×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Cold Service--Allowable Primary and Secondary Stresses

Cold Service--Allowable Primary and Secondary Stresses

Cold Service--Allowable Primary and Secondary Stresses

(OP)
An existing carbon steel vessel, which was not impact tested, is being evaluated for suitability.  Desired MDMT is -150 F.  When operation will occur at this temperature general membrane stresses are such that the ratio as shown in Figure UCS-66.1 is less than 0.35.

Local stresses at nozzles and saddles will be evaluated using FEA and following Division 2 rules, but using the Sm value from Division 1.  

Question:  For Primary and Primary plus Secondary Stresses is it appropriate in this case to use 1.5 times Sm and 3 times the average of Sm (cold) and Sm (hot) as prescribed by the Code for the allowable local stresses?   

RE: Cold Service--Allowable Primary and Secondary Stresses

Ummmmmm,,,  Carbon steel at -150F ..???

-MJC

   

RE: Cold Service--Allowable Primary and Secondary Stresses

1.5 and 3 times are in accordance with the code and normal practices, I would however consider them too optimistic and use some conservative 1 and 2-2.5 times Sm.
Is your carbon steel vessels actual thickness less than 0.3"? If not, refer to MJC reply...
cheers,
gr2vessels

RE: Cold Service--Allowable Primary and Secondary Stresses

(OP)
gr2vessels,

Thanks for your response.  It seems reasonable, however, is there anything in technical literature to support your recommendation?

To answer your guestion, the vessel was originally impact tested at -55F.  Only during infrequent upset conditions would it be possible for the vessel to be exposed to the minus 150F temperature.  When this occurs the internal pressure is very low and the thickness ratio per UCS 66.1 is much less than .35.  The nominal thickness of the equipment is 0.5".

RE: Cold Service--Allowable Primary and Secondary Stresses

spayette,

That is actually a very astute question that you have raised.  It raises issues of a failure mode (brittle fracture) that the 1.5Sm and 3Sm limits do not address.  I would be very hesitant to use any limit in excess of that given by UCS-66.

Given the severity of the failure mode (brittle/rapid fracture), I would actually suggest that you address this question directly to the ASME Section VIII Subgroup Design Code Committee.  The contact information is here - http://cstools.asme.org/csconnect/CommitteePages.cfm?Committee=N20110300.  The requirements for asking the question are located in Appendix 16.

RE: Cold Service--Allowable Primary and Secondary Stresses

After thinking about this some more, I realized that what you are doing is more of a re-rate - therefore, for your particular case, I would recommend that you refer to API-579/ASME FFS-1, Part 3 "Assessment of Existing Equipment for Brittle Fracture".

RE: Cold Service--Allowable Primary and Secondary Stresses

Sprayette...

Unless I am mistaken, all simple carbon steels will experience a transition to brittle behavior (and failure) at some nill-ductility transition temperature.

http://steel.keytometals.com/Articles/Art98.htm

And this is why some choose to pay a premium and use austenitic materials at low temperatures.

Are we only simply arguing about which set of rules that will apply to your case..??

-MJC

   

RE: Cold Service--Allowable Primary and Secondary Stresses

(OP)
TGS4,
Thanks for your replies.  I appreciate your suggestion about forwarding this issue to ASME.  

The owner has performed an API-579 Level 2 assessment and has concluded that the vessel is suitable for the -150F design temperature.  I spent some time looking through API-579 but I could not find any guidance on allowable stress for local primary and secondary loadings other than what ASME mentions.  I may follow your suggestion and go to the design code committee.  Thanks again.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources