×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

X bracing

X bracing

X bracing

(OP)
In X bracing (tension only brace) frames, what is the basis assumption of tension only brace. I think when we provide bolted connections (no slots), there is always compression in the brace subjected to shear?  The brace in question carries 80 kips compression resulting in big member, & in tension only case, results in small section.

Any force transfer mechanism (for tension only case)??


Thanks

Member100

RE: X bracing

I think the assumption is that when the brace is placed under lateral load, the compression diagonal will undergo a small amount of elastic buckling distortion.

When this happens, the relative stiffness of the tension brace (AE/PL) is much higher than the semi-buckled compression brace and thus all or most of the load goes into the tension brace (Hooke's Law).

This can especially be visualized if you consider small steel rods as the brace members - a high strength steel tension rod vs. a wet noodle compression rod.

RE: X bracing

Ah, this is also a question in my mind for a long time. I have seen many existing structures with X bracings, based on my checking, it won't work because the small section X bracing can not resist compression and compression (not tension) should be existed in these X bracing. I don't know if I am wrong or these existing structures were designed wrong.

RE: X bracing

It's as JAE says - you assume the compression member will buckle and only the tension brace is acting to resist the lateral loads.  It is still a stable system.

RE: X bracing

Sorry, JAE, I did not see your response. I think your response answered my puzzle. Yes, these X bracing is always one diagonal member in compression and another one in tension.

RE: X bracing

i always assign my x or vert brace as truss.. never as tension member..

should i now reconsider this approach..

what happens if the WT can actually take the compression..
should i still consider v brace as tension member only..

RE: X bracing

You only need to model your brace as tension only if your allowing it to buckle and providing an alternate load path. If you've modeled it as a truss member and it's designed to handle the compression load, that is fine.

RE: X bracing

I don't know about all programs, but RISA lets you enter members as Euler Buckling members. If you use this feature, the program will use the compression strength of the member up to the buckling point. If the force exceeds the buckling capacity, the the load path is redirected. I feel it is the most pratical way to design X bracing.  

RE: X bracing

True, but considering Euler buckling alone wouldn't be enough as it's not taking into account local buckling. Doing what you describe is more of a stability analysis than an analysis to generate design loads. One should choose what they want the member to be responsible for and model it as such.

RE: X bracing

We use Tension-Only systems all the time in Transmission Towers (hence my handle)and there are a couple of things to watch for.  You always need a horizontal girt member at the top of the panel to take the shear load across to the tension member from the one that goes into compression.  If you use the compression member to brace the leg post column or the compression member with a system of redundant members, you must be sure that both X members do not go into compression under certain load cases.  ASCE 10 is a good reference on how to design tension-only systems and has a requirement that the tension member must have 20% of the load in the compression member in order to consider the out of plane resistance at the cross over point as a braced point.

_____________________________________
I have been called "A storehouse of worthless information" many times.

RE: X bracing

The best example of tenson only X-bracing is the case where cables are used as the members.  The positively can only take tension.

I agree with the point made by agostage, design the members according to the theory you choose, tension only or reversible tension-compression or truss; just be consistant.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources