×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Diverse Member Cross Section Cost Comparison

Diverse Member Cross Section Cost Comparison

Diverse Member Cross Section Cost Comparison

(OP)
Anyone know of an effective way of comparing diverse steel and aluminum members for simple beam support to give the best dollar for strength. Have flexibility in design for choosing cross sections, mainly looking at I-beam, channel, round, square and rectangular tubing. Thank you. Vava1

RE: Diverse Member Cross Section Cost Comparison

The loading needs to be taken into account.

I have attempted similar, by creating a spreadsheet listing many structural steel shapes and properties (i.e. cross-sectional area, moment of intertia, etc). Then, by inputting the loading, the spreadsheet would calculate the shear/moment for the span, determine the maximum stress in the member. This list can then be used to determine options of what will work. It would be easy enough to add a "cost" column to determine the cheapest acceptable member.

However, I think a spreadsheet that allows entering a wide array of loading, and contains the hundreds of structural steel members, would be quite large and complex. Typically, I have a single spreadsheet that allows for only a single loading, and modifying it to a different situation is cumbersome to say the least.

-- MechEng2005

RE: Diverse Member Cross Section Cost Comparison

Dollars per volume/allowable stress.

RE: Diverse Member Cross Section Cost Comparison

I hope you mean to compare steel to steel, and aluminum to aluminum...

When designing to a given siatuation, the cheapest is typically the lightest.  Further, more in depth, comparisons are not easy; That's why there are so many shapes available.

The shapes that are offered by the steel mills are based on being as material efficient as possible while minimising any "additional" works required, such as stiffeners.

There are several good threads on efficient/economical design; I suggest you do a search.  I will, however, be very interested to read other people's remarks.

Regards,

YS

B.Eng (Carleton)
Working in New Zealand, thinking of my snow covered home...

RE: Diverse Member Cross Section Cost Comparison

(OP)
Would there be any need to account for the section modulus and/or modulus of elasticity - say comparing cost effectiveness of steel 46ksi rect tubing vs an 35ksi aluminum alloy I-beam?

RE: Diverse Member Cross Section Cost Comparison

I would say yes giving that many designs are serviceability and deflection controlled.  

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources