×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Nodal Bracing for Columns

Nodal Bracing for Columns

Nodal Bracing for Columns

(OP)
Folks,
I am having a discussion with one of my senior engineers regarding the attachment of a nodal brace for a column.

The nodal brace is designed for 1% of the compression load on the column and meets the axial stiffness requirements.

My question is thus:
Does the connection from the column web to the bracing beam need to be a slip critical connection or can it be a bearing type connection with fully tightened bolts?

Even though the standard holes only have a hole diameter of 1/16 more than the bolt diameter, I am questioning whether things will be fine in the period between when the column goes into compression and then eventually into bearing at the brace?

Thanks

RE: Nodal Bracing for Columns

Use the same bolt design as the rest of the structure. If you start mixing connection theory on the job something is bound to get screwed up.

Old CA SE

RE: Nodal Bracing for Columns

(OP)
Are you then suggesting that it does not make any difference on whether there is movement in the connection prior to it engaging in compression?

I am using bearing type bolts A325 N.

In principle, I totally agree with your KISS concept. [:)]

RE: Nodal Bracing for Columns

If you are concerned, just take the (1/16") slip into account when determining the provided stiffness to check against the required stiffness.   

RE: Nodal Bracing for Columns

I'm thinking that the additional 1/16" wouldn't change the physical reality enough to worry about considering the coarseness of the overall method.  

It just changes *when* the brace starts picking up load--when the column is bent to its initial out-of-plumbness (OOP) or its OOP+1/16".  The bigger its initial OOP, the bigger the brace force and stiffness required.

I don't have my seminar notes here, but I think those equations are based on an initial OOP = L/500.  I guess it depends on how 1/16" compares to L/500 for your case.  If the column is 30' long, the 1/16" wouldn't be adding much.

The way I look at calcs like this, right or wrong, is in the context of how closely we can actually predict what's going to happen.  In a lot of cases, you could predict behavior one way versus another, go run a series of tests and who knows which method would correlate better with reality.  Splitting gnat hairs?

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources