×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Why burn up the Jules Verne ATV in the atmosphere?

Why burn up the Jules Verne ATV in the atmosphere?

Why burn up the Jules Verne ATV in the atmosphere?

(OP)
Recently the Jules Verne Auto Transport Vehicle (ATV) delivered a load of 3.5 tons of cargo to the ISS. Then, the 13.4 ton ATV departed the ISS and it's orbit was slowed enough to allow it to enter the atmosphere and disintegrate.

Being that it's very expensive to haul tons of material up into orbit, isn't there a better way to utilize those thousands of pounds of metal and other material instead of burning it up?  

DH

RE: Why burn up the Jules Verne ATV in the atmosphere?

In the short term, no.  It's a specialized piece of equipment, with no way to modify it with current tools/technology once it's up there, so it's useless except as dead weight.

As dead weight, in an unstable orbit*, it will eventually de-orbit due to drag...and if deorbited that way, there is no/little control over where it will land.  So, best to leave a little fuel on board, and drive it into a fairly empty place on the ocean, rather than risk hurting somebody.

*Yes, the ISS is in an unstable orbit, and will eventually degrade and re-enter, without regular visits from Russian "tankers" to top off fuel.

RE: Why burn up the Jules Verne ATV in the atmosphere?

First off the ATVs are cheap... relatively speaking. Non-manned vehicles are disposable.

The constant controlled decay is minimized by all sorts of operations on ISS not just the resupply, by the Space Shuttle, ATVs, and Russian Soyuz & Progress Flights. All LEO(Low Earth Orbit) Satellites Decay, because of Atmospheric and Gravitational Drag. However saying it is in unstable orbit is a misnomer.

Audentes fortuna juvat

"Never tell people how to do things. Tell them what to do, and they will surprise you with their ingenuity." --George S. Patton

RE: Why burn up the Jules Verne ATV in the atmosphere?

Adding the systems and the ability to survive re-entry would reduce its cargo capacity quite a bit.

RE: Why burn up the Jules Verne ATV in the atmosphere?

"However saying it is in unstable orbit is a misnomer. "

...uhh...so it's in a stable orbit?

RE: Why burn up the Jules Verne ATV in the atmosphere?

It is in a decaying orbit, as all LEO craft are.
The orbit will become unstable when no longer can make one more round.
Hydrae

RE: Why burn up the Jules Verne ATV in the atmosphere?

"It is in a decaying orbit, as all LEO craft are.
The orbit will become unstable when no longer can make one more round.
Hydrae "


Right.  And the Aussies won't mind a bit that the ISS just "decayed" into their back yards.

Semantics are wonderful things.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources