×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Unconfined Compression Test vs. Cohesion

Unconfined Compression Test vs. Cohesion

Unconfined Compression Test vs. Cohesion

(OP)
If a soils testing Laboratory gives Unconfined Compressive Strengths (qu) of a rock sample can that be correlated to the Rock Cohesion by qu/2?

Thank you.

RE: Unconfined Compression Test vs. Cohesion

Rock mass strength is rarely governed primarily by the strength of intact rock.  More often, it is the discontinuities that control, with intact strength being secondary.

RE: Unconfined Compression Test vs. Cohesion

Firstly, I completly agree with dgillette, primary strength is almost meaningless in evaluating the behavoir of a rock mass.  Bedding, joints, schistocity, water pressure acting in these features and the quality of any/all infill materials (i.e., clay) have a much greater affect then the strength of the intact rock mass.

On the more basic geometric question, the answer is, no but close.  If you perform an unconfined compressive strength test you will get a maximum deviator stress for some failure criterion.  That maximum deviator stress is the diameter of a Mohr's circle.  So half of that value is some measure of shear strength for some measure of normal loading.

Cohesion is the shear strength for a normal load of zero.  You can't determine the shear strength for a normal load of zero when you are performing a test that includes a normal load reaction.  Just because sigma3 is zero doesn't mean that the normal load is zero.

If you consider the P-Q plot of a unconfined compressive strength test (or the stress path to failure), you will have a point that falls on the line "alpha" not a point that falls on the line "phi".  These are geometrically related, but not equal.

Your question specifically related to rock.  In soil, we have a parameter called "undrained shear strength".  The undrained shear strength of a soil can be described by one-half of the unconfined compressive strength, but that's a separate topic.

Not to confuse that is. . . .

f-d

¡papá gordo ain't no madre flaca!

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources