×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Duplex tubes expanded in 316 tubesheet

Duplex tubes expanded in 316 tubesheet

Duplex tubes expanded in 316 tubesheet

(OP)
We have new air-cooler bundles, with Duplex tubes expanded in 316 headerboxes.
The tubes have been expanded in accordance with API 660.

Principle of the connection is plastic deformartion of the tubes into the grooves of the tubesheets.
As the yield strength of duplex is 2,5x yield strenght of 316, I doubt if the connection is sufficient and leak tight.
(hydrotest has been performed without problems).

Does anyone have experience with this situation?

Kind regards,
Joost

RE: Duplex tubes expanded in 316 tubesheet

As long as a tube rolling or other form of tube expansion procedure was written and qualified via pull out testing (using a tubesheet mock-up to verify tube wall reduction), I see no problems.

RE: Duplex tubes expanded in 316 tubesheet

Motorjoost

What I understand from your post is that you're questioning whether performing a plastic deformation of the tubes into the grooves of the tubesheets in accordance with API 660 will lead to problems with leakage in the future.

I don't deal with the petroleum standards such as API so I don't know how that applies; however, the concept of using tube expansion is valid and, as metengr said, as long as you used a qualified test procedure, you should be ok.

As you say the hydro was performed without problems, what is underlying your concern about the application?  Do you have really high vibration in the tubes?  Have you seen problems before?

Patricia Lougheed

Please see FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies for tips on how to make the best use of the Eng-Tips Forums.

RE: Duplex tubes expanded in 316 tubesheet

(OP)
Thanks for your answers so far.

Herewith some more information:

The expanded connention has not been qualified by means of pull-out test.

A hydrotest test does not necessary mean the connection is leak-tight.
for example:
A tube-bundle can pass a hydrotest @ 30 barg, however the same bundle can leak at a helium leaktest @ 0,3 barg.
(note: a helium leak-test has also not been performed)

Joost

RE: Duplex tubes expanded in 316 tubesheet

motorjoost, you are right to be concerned about this joint.

If available you might look at ASME Sec VIII, Div 1, Appendix A. API 660 may have something similar, I am not familiar with it.

Without looking up the numbers I believe Appendix A would require qualification testing due to the difference in yield strengths between the tubes and tubesheets.

Regards,

Mike

RE: Duplex tubes expanded in 316 tubesheet

motorjoost;
Here is what you should do; use the same conditions for tube expansion in the field and with a mock-up perform a pull out test. You will know right away if the roll expansion was too light. Roll joint strength relies on frictional force between the tubesheet hole and the roll expanded tube.

You cannot simply use mechanical property data to base your evaluation. A pull out test is definitive.

RE: Duplex tubes expanded in 316 tubesheet

We would do a Helium Leak Test by putting the tube side under vacuum, introducing Helium from the outside, and checking for leaks using a mass spec.
Best test available.
 

RE: Duplex tubes expanded in 316 tubesheet

Weeeds
That method is well and good but it is sometimes hard to located the actual leak as there are several welds in  close proximity. I think a better way is to pressurize the
shell with He and N and use a sniffer probe. Prior to the I would use a leak detector fluid and check for and fix any leaks. If any are found leaking fix them before checking
with the probe.

Even if a pull-out test shows some deficiency in the joint as is I think the bundle can and should be made workable.

The link to Hydra Pro has a list of papers/articles that you could get through a library or the Linda Hall Library. Also on the Hydro Pro site they have a method for the future of presetting the tubes prior to mechanical rolling or hydro expansion or welding.

To All:
How difficult would it be to seal weld the tubes?

Have you considered hydraulic expansion?

What is the tube and tube hole size information and how many grooves?

what are the operating  conditions?

http://www.hpro.com/papers.php

http://www.lindahall.org/
 

RE: Duplex tubes expanded in 316 tubesheet

(OP)
All,

Thanks for your help!

ASME VIII div.1 appendix A specifies indeed exactly the tests that need to be performed in these kind of situations.

Kind regards,

Joost

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources