×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Fairchild IGBTs OK?

Fairchild IGBTs OK?

Fairchild IGBTs OK?

(OP)
Basically just looking for feedback here on the quality level and how far said IGBTs deviate from the datasheet specs (ie - says it will handle 60A at Tc = 100C but lets out the magic smoke at 40A, etc...). I'm mainly interested in non-punch-through (NPT) or "field stop" IGBTs for easy paralleling and several Fairchild parts keep coming up in my searches at, eg, half the cost of IXYS/Infineon/IRF/etc and since I totally believe TANSTAAFL I'm wondering what gives. So, any feedback would be most welcome. (this will be my first use of IGBTs for something besides tinkering, btw).

-Jeff
 

RE: Fairchild IGBTs OK?

Check that your design is correct, that you consider all losses, that you measure case temperature at the proper spot before blaming a manufacturer.

RE: Fairchild IGBTs OK?

(OP)
Um, I'm not blaming anyone for anything... yet. All I'm looking for at this point is some feedback from people that have used Fairchild IGBTs. This is mainly because I'm having a hard time believing they aren't "too good to be true" because they are so much cheaper than their competitors. E.g., Fairchild part number FGH40N60UFD is a "Field Stop" IGBT that costs around $2US in 100's and has the following specs:

Ic = 40A @ 100C (I never bother with the 25C rating)
Vce[sat] = 1.8V @ 40A
Qg = 120nC @ 400V
*positive TC of Vce[sat] at all current levels shown*

Nobody else has a device with similar specs for less than twice this price; actually the specs are less compelling and the price is usually 3x to 4x higher. I have had good results with Fairchild MOSFETs in the past and have chosen them for the same reasons - they had the best price/performance ratio at the time - but the differences in price were not so stark between their MOSFETs and their competitors' as they are with their IGBTs.
 

RE: Fairchild IGBTs OK?

The price you have to pay for such a device in small quantities (100s is a small quantity) is more governed by sales channel than by manufactureing and technology.

Most semiconductor manufactueres are just not intrested in selling a few hundered TO-220 parts.

RE: Fairchild IGBTs OK?

(OP)
Do you have any observations or experience with Fairchild IGBTs, electricuwe? That is what I was asking about, after all...

That said, my experience with many semi manufacturers flatly contradicts what you just stated: they are more than happy to provide technical support and design assistance whether I'm buying a 100 parts a year through a distributor, or 10,000 directly from them.

 

RE: Fairchild IGBTs OK?

The FGH40N60UFD looks like a really good part. I'm comparing it to the IRGP50B60D which I'm currently using  at the 25A average operating point that I have.
$4.52 each vs. $1.79 for the FGH40N60.
The FGH40N60UFD has slightly better gate charge, better Qrr of the diode, and turn-off loss (in mJ/A), and the total switching loss of the IRGP' is 68% of the FGH'.

MMMM, I haven't answered your question about what can be wrong with this part. Looks like a really good price!  

RE: Fairchild IGBTs OK?

(OP)
Exactly, hgldr - it has great specs, the graphs seem to back them up and if you use the usual 40-60% derating of the usually overly-ambitious current capability you still end up with a part that delivers excellent value. I guess I'm just a little bit skeptical *because* the price/performance ratio is so good... I'm guessing/hoping it's because Fairchild is trying to grab market share and not because the specs are pure fiction. :)

 

RE: Fairchild IGBTs OK?

The price/performance ratio mainly is the result of applying the Fieldstop approach. Compared to NPT losses go down significantly at the price of more difficult control and higher requirements on keeping stray inductance low.

If you can deal with this, even when paralleling, it's fine.

Check Infineon for parts with even lower losses:
http://www.infineon.com/dgdl/IHW40T60+Rev1.pdf?folderId=db3a304412b407950112b408e8c90004&;fileId=db3a304316f66ee80117543d566c0631

Don't know about cost.

Check for conference papers from Infineon on IGBT3 for details of the technology.

Regarding your experience with support: where are you located ?

RE: Fairchild IGBTs OK?

I know folks that are using the Fairchild IGBTs with excellent results.  I believe that Fairchild bought the Harris IGBT products and I used those; good parts.  Had some analysed once.  I recall they had some secret Gold doping somewhere that surprised the analysis folks (International Rectifier I think).

RE: Fairchild IGBTs OK?

(OP)
electricuwe - the Infineon part you referenced has a slightly lower conduction loss but twice the gate charge. Not a good trade-off for my application. Matching between the built-in anti-parallel diode and the IGBT is exceptionally good, though, and that is a benefit. However, the Infineon part is not available from *any* of the major US distributors and that pretty much eliminates it from the running: I hate being held hostage by a single supplier.

I'm in the US - Florida. Until very recently I have never had a poor technical support experience with any US manufacturer; the recent offender was International Rectifier (and I suspect their being taken over by Vishay has a lot to do with that).

sreid - Thanks much for your observations - that's just the sort of second-hand, totally unsubstantiated data I needed to convince me to buy a hundred of those babies ;)

 

RE: Fairchild IGBTs OK?

sreid is correct regarding Harris IGBT products beeing bought by Fairchild. I also used Harris parts in the past with good experience. But Fairchild transfered engineering to Korea and manufacturing to China and in the mean time several new technologies have been introduced. So I do not know how much of the Harris genes is still within the Fairchild products.

RE: Fairchild IGBTs OK?

I still like IXYS personally.  Good products, good support but they do charge a premium.  Sometimes worth it, better sleep.

RE: Fairchild IGBTs OK?

I grew up one block from International Rectifier.  As a kid, I used to go and collect selenium rectifier stacks from their trash.  Anyone remember those?

RE: Fairchild IGBTs OK?

Sure!  I had to flee the poison gas from my overloaded rectifiers several times.

Keith Cress
kcress - http://www.flaminsystems.com

RE: Fairchild IGBTs OK?

(OP)
Here's the update: I went ahead and bought a hundred of the Fairchild FGH40N60UFD but after talking with some of the other folks involved in this venture we thought that there might be an overall economic advantage in going with a single IGBT module (cost of assembly, time to design, etc.). So, despite what I said above about not wanting to be held hostage to a single supplier, I called up Semikron to ask, somewhat hopelessly I'll admit, about the price/availability of their new SKM600GB066D Trench/NPT module - in quantities of 24 (standard box size) they want $100 ea. Sold!

Oh, and electricuwe - Semikron uses Infineon dice to make the modules, so I went ahead and made the trade-off of higher Qg for lower conduction loss (Qg = 4400nC; gonna take 15A current pulses to transition the gate in 200nS...)
 

RE: Fairchild IGBTs OK?

(OP)
$100 for a 600A/600V half-bridge module that can switch as fast as 77nS seems pretty good to me. It's not like there was an overwhelming number of choices here, but I gather from the ?? you think I could have done better? If so, do tell. I'm stuck with these hundred but nothing says I have to keep buying them in the future.

 

RE: Fairchild IGBTs OK?

If you want to use Infineon dies in modules, you can also choose from the Infineon (former eupec) product range:

http://www.infineon.com/cms/en/product/channel.html?channel=ff80808112ab681d0112ab69e70c0364

Regarding current rating:

The manufacturer need a number to print on the package, but for a design you need to do a loss calculation according the specific operating conditions. When comparing just by the nominal rating be aware that some rate at 25°C and others at 80°C..100°C case temperature.

Please consider that with IGBTs you do not have the same loss vs. die size trade off as with Mosfets (due to threshold in forward voltage like a diode). So using 600 A rating instead of 40 A will have only a small benefit in losses.

Make a sound choice technically with two or three alternatives and then care about availability and price.  

RE: Fairchild IGBTs OK?

(OP)
electricuwe - you must have missed where I wrote this about the Fairchild IGBT under consideration:

Ic = 40A @ 100C (I never bother with the 25C rating)

The rest of your post assumes such a level of cluelessness on my part it is hard to interpret it as anything but rude. Suffice it to say, I did not choose a 600A module over a 40A single IGBT "just to get the loss down"; I choose the 600A module because it will need to switch 200-300A continuously with peaks approaching 600A.

***

itsmoked - the way I look at the price of the module is this: it offers the equivalent ratings of, say, 20 single IGBTs in one convenient package and someone else went to the trouble to make sure they are all thermally coupled and dynamically matched - that's worth a premium, in my opinion, but to get it for a discount is a no-brainer!

RE: Fairchild IGBTs OK?

Sorry Renovator1, I didn't intend to offend you. But unfortunately there are more and more participants in this forum who lack a sound engineering background.

On your part you could do lot to avoid confusion, if you clearly state what your requirements are. Starting a discussion on 40 A devices and than later changing to 600 A modules without providing background information is quite misleading.

By the way, if you want to compare devices at 100°C case the Semikron Module is a 490 A device. Assuming this your intial design must have involved paralleling more than 10 Discrete devices, which is not an eays task. The pitfalls you can get by wrong arrangement or driving easily override differences in quality you will find at different manufacturers.

But basicly both approaches are viable. Benfetits of the discrete approach are lower device cost, better heatspreading and, if done properly, lower total stray inductance.

Advantages of the module are integrated isolation of the power circuit to the baseplate, avoiding the difficult external paralleling and the lower manufacturing cost for the inverter.


 

RE: Fairchild IGBTs OK?

In power modules, the free wheeling dide is matched to the die size-speed.  Same for IGBT descrete Co-Packs.  I always buy the short circuit rated devices even thourh the losses are higher.  With (almost) all modern FETs, the body diode is rated for use as the free wheeling diode.  Regulate the gate voltage to 15VDC if you want your Short Circuit protection to work.

RE: Fairchild IGBTs OK?

(OP)
electricuwe - no problem, I appreciate your last response. I did not state the application up front but I did mention that "easy paralleling" was a must for the discretes. At any rate, the application is a series wound DC traction motor controller that does regen (a 2 quadrant drive, in other words). I know from experience that even getting more than a few mosfets to switch on and off at the same time (despite the positive Rds[on] tempco!) is a real trial and usually requires hand-matching for transconductance... Not something you want to have to do for anything that will be produced in volume! I expect the same issues with IGBTs except with the added bonus that most also have a negative tc for Vce[sat]. The exception here seems to be the NPT technology which trades off excellent paralleling (positive Vce[sat] tc) and low on drop for slower switching speed and lower voltage rating. Well, 600V is plenty for this application (192V is the practical maximum) and if I can switch 600A in 250nS that's plenty fast enough at 16kHz, so being able to do so in 77nS is just icing on the cake. Oh, and the module only costing $30 more than the equivalent amount of discretes (prior to derating for parallel operation) pretty much made it a no-brainer choice, I thought. Though, if I missed something that's what you folks are usually good for...

So, yeah, I was looking at somewhere between 15 and 20 of the 40A (@ 100C) Fairchild IGBTs in parallel for each side of the half bridge. I'm sure some day I'll find a use for the hundred I bought but for this app I think the Semikron module is the best choice.

Now, figuring out the most economical way to get rid of the waste heat without resorting to liquid cooling... I'm seriously considering embedding heat pipes into a standard aluminum extrusion heat sink... perhaps this should be a topic for another thread?

sreid - yeah, that's the nice thing about IGBTs compared to MOSFETs - IGBTs don't have an intrinsic (parasitic) freewheeling diode (FWD) so one has to be added to the package if needed. Thus, it is much easier to dope it properly for whatever optimizations are desired (low Vf, fast Tfr/Trr, etc.). The poor FWD in a MOSFET is pretty much along for the ride. That said, one not so good aspect of the Semikron module is that the Rth of the diode dice is higher than the Rth of the IGBT dice so the FWD ends up at a much higher below a certain duty cycle... The thermal modeling is driving me crazy as a result.
 

RE: Fairchild IGBTs OK?

Regarding cooling:
For a single 62mm Module, as long a you do not operate it to close to it's limit, you should be able to find a suitable combination of heatsink and fan. However, the module you have choosen is the maximum rating available in that package, so this makes it a tough job.

Take care that the most critical part thermally may be the diode when driving at low speed (low duty cycle for the IGBT, high duty cycle for the diode)

On IGBT and Mosfet-Diodes:
Intrinsic Diodes of Mosfets are really good in the lower voltage classes, but still very poor for the higher voltage ratings. Even the Diode in Mosfets with fast diode is poor compared to a dedicated diode.

On the choice of device itself:
For long time there has not been significant development in Mosfets in the range from 100...300 V. Therefore a 600 V IGBT outperformed a 15 year old Mosfet-Chip design in many cases. But now semiconductor suppliers recognising a new market for such devices increase their development effort for Mosfets in that range. Check what is announced.

RE: Fairchild IGBTs OK?

(OP)
electricuwe - yep, the true Achille's Heel is the anti-parallel diode: it has a much higher Rth[j-c] than the IGBT die does. I suspect that, practically speaking, this will not be a big factor (i.e. - the motor will only draw maximum current when accelerating from 0 RPM and as the rotor RPM increases, BEMF will automatically decrease the current that can be drawn for a given supply voltage).

That said, it is still true that IGBTs achieve a higher current density for a given die size than MOSFETs, or at least that's my understanding of the current state of the art of both devices.

RE: Fairchild IGBTs OK?

I like R-Theta Fab Fin Heatsinks with direct impingment Fan Cooling.  Ball Bearing DC Fans can have MTBF's in the 100,000 Hour range.

http://www.r-theta.com/

RE: Fairchild IGBTs OK?

To avoid oversizing the power electronics and to ensure smooth accelleration you should ramp up duty cycle slowly so that the speed is expected to follow or use a current loop. Even if you do not allow the current to exceed nominal value (which is done in most cases to get faster accelleration), the low speed region is critcal for the diode. And thermal time constants of the semiconductor chips are quite small compared to a mechanical system.

RE: Fairchild IGBTs OK?

(OP)
Thanks for the R-Theta link, sreid - their FabFin product is ideal for this application. Hope their prices are reasonable.. some of the heat sink quotes I've gotten so far have been nuts (it's hard for me to accept the heat sink costing more than the module it's supposed to cool...)

Anyway, I gave you a star for that one - thanks!

And you read my mind concerning the fan. Any particular manufacturer you prefer? I've had mostly good experiences with Comair/Rotron (formerly EG&G, wasn't it?).

electricuwe - You read my mind, too. Might be time for me to make a foil hat...

I'll be using local desat-detection to protect against abnormal events more or less instantly but an AVR microcontroller (optoisolated, of course) will keep an eye on the average current during motoring (buck) and regeneration (boost) modes and not allow them to exceed either pre-programmed absolute limits or user-programmed limits, whichever is lower.

One thing I'm not sure I can get away with but will be trying out soon: placing the gate driver/sensor board right on top of the IGBT module's bus bars. Besides the obvious benefits like minimizing the loop area between driver and gate, I'm going to see if mounting a couple of Allegro's linear Hall Effect Devices on the top side of the PC board directly centered over the relevant bus bars will allow me to monitor the current in them with reasonable accuracy... The app engineer at Allegro thinks it's an interesting idea but was somewhat skeptical about its accuracy/repeatability. Well, that's what prototypes are for :)

 

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources