×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Appropriate Design loads for Monorail System

Appropriate Design loads for Monorail System

Appropriate Design loads for Monorail System

(OP)
We are designing columns, headers & footers for a free-standing, 30 ton capacity monorail system, 32' tall. We are somewhat deadlocked on the debate as to what LATERAL load should be applied to the structure (by the lifted load).
AISC (9th edition) page 5-29 notes that 20% of lifted load & trolley shall be used for lateral load and 10% of the sum of wheel loads is used for longitudinal load.

The problem is that this paragraph applies to bridge crane runways (3 axis movment) - not monorail systems (2 axis movement); With monorails, there is theoreticly Zero lateral load.

I believe that 5% is more in order unless there is certainty that the user will be lifting off center (at which point the 30 tons will violently swing towards center)

I would appreciate your opinions on this subject
copy of dwg attached if needed

 

RE: Appropriate Design loads for Monorail System

An opinion... I consider your 5% proposal to be a very reasonable number.  This is based on somewhat rough analogy with assumed forces on the girders of bridge crane:

Page 57 of "Whiting Crane Handbook, 3rd Edition" (free .pdf download from this page of my website http://www.slideruleera.net/miscellaneous.html ) has the following statement about lateral forces that are assumed when designing bridge crane girders:

Quote:

Lateral load due to acceleration or deceleration shall be considered as 5% of the live load...
Of course this has to do with fact that the girders themselves, along with the lifted load, can be accelerated down the length of the runway. My point is that the assumed 5% is apparently adequate for "ALL" lateral forces on the girders. With that being the case, I see no reason to assume lateral forces any higher that 5%, for your application. At the same time, going any lower than 5% is probably not a good idea, because of the off center load lift, that you mentioned.

www.SlideRuleEra.net idea

www.VacuumTubeEra.net r2d2

RE: Appropriate Design loads for Monorail System

Seismic???

That may a much bigger concern depending on where this is going

RE: Appropriate Design loads for Monorail System

(OP)
Thank your for the comments;
To MiketheEngineer - The project is located in Florida where seismic loads are not considered. Wind loads are being considered. Thanks for the reminder.

RE: Appropriate Design loads for Monorail System

(OP)
Thanks your for the comments;
To MiketheEngineer - The project is located in Florida where seismic loads are not considered. Wind loads are being considered. Thanks for the reminder.

RE: Appropriate Design loads for Monorail System

20% is a good number if anyone proposes hooking to a weight not centered beneath the monorail.  The 20% horizontal load will be experienced and then drop suddenly to zero when the load is elevated.  The swing to the other side will be less than the 20% of weight when friction held the load against movement.  Draw a static load diagram and assume a factor of friction of 0.4. Thus when the horizontal component of the cable tension is 40% of the remaining weight resting on grade, movement starts.

RE: Appropriate Design loads for Monorail System

May I ask why would you ever permit an uncontrolled lift with a monorail?
I hope you have a RC controler.

An uncontrolled lift with two carriages is even worse. We have two single carriage monorails that we only allow around a 5 degree, measured at the carriage, off center load. We are going to a bridge crane to replace one of the monorails due to the possibility of having to pick an off center load.  

RE: Appropriate Design loads for Monorail System

(OP)
Wow - thanks for the excellent responses;
The trolley-hosits will in fact be radio controlled. Duty cycle fairly light. 5 to 8 lifts per day @ 50% to 85% capacity.
     
    Why would we permit uncontrolled lifts? - I've been in this business long enough to know it's expected rather than dis-regarded. The 5% value presented represents an 18" off center pick. To clarify, load is first picked off of a flat-bed truck (which can/should be centered(???)) and then is transferred to a large water-filled tank for testing. Load is then picked out of tank (self centering) and then put back on truck.

    Bare in mind we are trying to come up with a practical design load being transmitted into the "flagpole" columns and subsiquiently the footers. The design of the monorail beam itself is much less complicated.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources