×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Nodal Displacement variations

Nodal Displacement variations

Nodal Displacement variations

(OP)
Hi,
  i simulated a similar structure (actually more like a plate) with different element types
     1 3D solid element
     2. plane stress element
     3. plane strain elements
     4. shell elements

forces were applied in such a way that its sigma y is applied at the center of the structure.  
i observed that maximum displaced node is the exact center node. BUT the nodal displacements alone the vertical & horizontal center line is different for diffeerent element types.
For vertical Disp -
plane strain element's nodes have maximum displacements, then comes 3D solid,plane stress and the minimum displacements has occurred for the shell elements.

Does anyone know the reason for this change?? its the same structure with same dimensions for all the element types.
(i have used reduced integration and Quadratic for element types)

RE: Nodal Displacement variations

in-plane forces ?

RE: Nodal Displacement variations

Are all computed displacements numerically converged?

How long is this thing? My approach here is to determine if your end boundary conditions are affecting the results? What are the boundary conditions on the ends? Simply supported? Fixed? Are all boundary conditions on all models the same?

From your description, it appears you are doing the simple problem of a beam (or plate) loaded with a constant normal traction (in beam nomenclature, a 'constant distributed force'). Say this is a case of a rectangular loaded with constant pressure (or distributed force)--the plates/shells and 3D elements would have 4 boundaries to apply boundary conditions--are all four fixed? Or simply supported? Perhaps you applied simply supported to just 2 of the edges?

 Perhaps if you have a Roark's, you could tell us precisely the table and solution number of the structure, loading and boundary conditions you are trying to simulate?

RE: Nodal Displacement variations

You are really mixing up everything. 2D models are supposed to be applied when the loads and deformations are merely working in the plane itself.

2D plane stress is used for very thin parts: the stress components orthogonal to the deformation plane are zero. The orthogonal strains aren't.

2D plane strain is used for infinitely long parts: de strain components orhtogonal tot the deformation plane are zero. The orthogonal stresses aren't.

It is very obvious that you get other results since the used element equations differ. Otherwise there would be no reason to distinguish between them.

A shell works primarily as a curved plate that acts as a membrane (uniform stress) combined with bending stress. This is a 3D (curved) plate with a small thickness. The element equations behave completely different from a 2D situation.
When the thickness is small in comparison to the length or width, you can use a shell model.
  
For a flat an thin plate, the results of 2D plane stress and shells must be almost the same.

A SOLID gives a good solution when the plate is not too thin. Thin plates make the meshes to much deformed. Deformed meshes do not give very good results. You should use in that case wedges or bricks or use a very fine mesh, but this increases calculation time enormously.

RE: Nodal Displacement variations

hashanw007,

Looking at the thread that you started in the mechanical engineering forum, and this thread, I believe you need to read a book before asking this forum to supplement your education.  These questions are relatively basic for an engineer with any time in an FEA class.  Self-study will do a great deal so long as you understand some reasonable level of math and some fundamentals of mechanics of materials.

There are plenty of books recommended in this forum if you do a search.  One that comes up often is A First Course in the Finite Elements Method by Logan

I don't mean to be rude...I just want to save all of us some time and frustration.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources