×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Decrease hardness/dimensional change of quenched/tempered 100Cr6 steel

Decrease hardness/dimensional change of quenched/tempered 100Cr6 steel

Decrease hardness/dimensional change of quenched/tempered 100Cr6 steel

(OP)
We use 100Cr6 quenched and tempered steel from two different suppliers. The steel is quenched in oil (60°C) and tempered for 1.5h at 165°C. The working temperature of these components can be up to 170°C continuously. The component needs to have  a certain hardness and stable dimensions.
We did a test: we put the components in a furnace at 170°C for 100hours. After that we measured the hardness and dimensions.
For the first supplier we see that the dimensions have increased (appr. 0.03mm), but with hardly any decrease of hardness.
The second supplier shows a decrease in hardness (appr. 4HRC), but with a less increase in dimensions (appr. 0.01mm).
How could the difference between the two suppliers be explained? Is there an inverse relation between changes in dimensions and hardness?
Does the content of the retained austenite may be of influence? How can these changes be eliminated?

RE: Decrease hardness/dimensional change of quenched/tempered 100Cr6 steel

A small drop in hardness would be expected with service temperature slightly above the tempering temperature.  One possible explanation is that the first sample (which experianced the greatest growth) contained a signifigant amount of retained austenite.  During the 100 hour 170C treatment, carbides percipitated from the austenite so that it formed fresh martensite on cooling (which results in a volume expansion).  This fresh martensite offset the loss of hardness of the tempered martensite.  The other sample contained little or no retained austenite so it saw little or no volume change and the hardness loss was observable.

This can be eliminated by a double temper treatment, perhaps with a low temperature treatement between tempers(which the second supplier may have done as normal processing for this material).

rp

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources