×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Trending Motor Meggar Readings???

Trending Motor Meggar Readings???

Trending Motor Meggar Readings???

(OP)
I would like to take a moment of your time and ask your professional opinion in regards to motor meggaring.  

Currently, our facility uses off line testing approach - meggar for the condition of our motors under a specific hp range, environment and criticality.  We do use a Baker testing approach - resistance to milliohms on a few assets, and partial discharge for our 13.8kV+ motors.  We are looking into MCA, but are not quite there.

Presently, I am developing an asset care program, using RCM methodology's, and software that allows us to track and trend field reading and trigger alarms if deviation from normal occurs.

In the event of motor meggaring, have anyone seen meggaring of motors trended before?  I have read a few white papers showing how meggar reading have trended and allowed for a better understanding and condition, using a condition based monitoring approach on a set frequency or even a failure finding approach used after a period of shutdown.

Also, if we don't presently have a greater line of defense other than meggaring until new PdM technologies come into play at our mill, would this process of trending assist and be affective?  I am really scratching my head!?

I thank you greatly for your time and hope to clarify my understanding and better my knowledge in regards to motor testing.

Yours sincerely,
Rick

RE: Trending Motor Meggar Readings???

There are 2 reasons to do a IR test (Megger).
1. Ensure the insulation resistance is above acceptable values
2. Trending

What does a 800M reading tell you, really nothing by itself, but if it was 2G last year, you have a problem coming soon.

Make sure to temp correct your readings or your trending will be useless.  

RE: Trending Motor Meggar Readings???

(OP)
Thanks Zoozog.  Is there any white papers that are out there that you know expressing the reasons to IR?  It would be nice to see so direction and clarity in regards to the trending.

Your comment was greatly appreciated.
Rick

RE: Trending Motor Meggar Readings???

Those would be the 2 references I would look at also.  

RE: Trending Motor Meggar Readings???

The key to trending of test data is a consistent and accurate test regimen.  The old days of cranking the handle on the megger and taking down the first reading where the needle stops swinging isn't good for trending, and in too many electrical departments, that's the best you'll get.

A good carefully constructed procedure and a training program to make sure the data gatherers understand how and why to apply it can give useful data.  However, I've seen few facilities that go this step.  Some of my (former) clients had pretty decent programs but they did two things:  1) Applied the program to large motors only and 2) used an outside testing company to do the data gathering in lieu of training their own staff.

old field guy

RE: Trending Motor Meggar Readings???

True, you need to temp correct for trending, but you can't correct for humidity. A polarization index doesn't take much longer and eliminates the correction problems.  

RE: Trending Motor Meggar Readings???

You might take a look at item 3-1 and possibly 3-4 at the link below.  3-1 has a lot of good info not just on insulation resistance testing, but other types of insulation testing:
http://www.usbr.gov/power/data/fist_pub.html

We trend insulation resistance on large critical motors, including thirty 13.8kv motors and around sixty  4kv motors and thirty 460 v motors (we have lot more 460v motors, but not considered critical).  Over the course of 8 years and around 6 motor failures, there is only one motor failure where an advanced warning showed up in the trend, and the change was not significant enough that we paid attention to it.  (post-failure inspection showed the motor had significant oil contamination that eventually caused a failure in the endwinding).  

We have had several of our outdoor motors that meggered bad because the space heaters had been off for some reason.  So we dried the motors until we could pass the test. That was probably a useful exercize that we might have overlooked if we didn't test.

One big decision you have to make is whetehr you will determinate for test.  If you don't, sometimes the cable insulation resistance will be much lower than the motor and you are trending nothing but the cable.  Also it can be work, particularly if the terminations need to be taped with Raychem.  If you do determinate, realize that your quest to monitor improvement to improve reliability has the potential to introduce a failure if the termination is not reassembled properly.  (we have never had that happen).

=====================================
Eng-tips forums: The best place on the web for engineering discussions.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources