×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Short range remote.

Short range remote.

Short range remote.

(OP)
I'm considering a product that would need to be completely cordless.  It needs to be controllable over a distance of about 30ft. Bi-directional info would be preferred but not absolutely required.  Low data rates.  Perhaps 300baud would be plenty.

The control unit would be like a typical TV remote.  Perhaps smaller.

I really don't want to 'scratch build' the rf stuff nor do the full FCC Monty.

What tech and frequency should I be contemplating?

ISM no doubt, but which.

Got any favorites?

 

Keith Cress
kcress - http://www.flaminsystems.com

RE: Short range remote.

Instinct might suggest that you just need a very simple transceiver set, but these days it might be better, faster and cheaper to just 'go with the flow' and use something like Bluetooth - in spite of it being massive overkill.


 

RE: Short range remote.

I've used the Nordic Semiconductor (http://www.nordicsemi.com/) parts for this. They operate in the 2.4GHz ISM band, which is good for stuff that ships to many other countries. If you're just looking at products for the US, then I think there are other bands that would work.

Glenn

RE: Short range remote.

I'm not really sure how you can get away from the FCC crapola if it's a commercial wireless product.  They need to stay in power somehow...

Dan - Owner
http://www.Hi-TecDesigns.com

RE: Short range remote.

(OP)
Yeah.  No I recognize the test requirements what I was meaning was the OTS solutions that have their certs already.

VE1BLL; Yes that might make more sense.

geekEE;  Thanks for the link.  Looks interesting.  It could go international but I'm not sure.  I'm a little concerned the 2.4 region is way crowded and could result in issues with phones, et al.
 

Keith Cress
kcress - http://www.flaminsystems.com

RE: Short range remote.

If it could go international, then I think 2.4GHz might be your best bet.  Here's an app note from TI that discusses the various ISM bands and worldwide compliance.
http://focus.ti.com.cn/cn/lit/an/swra048/swra048.pdf
I think the worldwide compliance is one reason that Bluetooth is in that band.

I haven't seen any issues with the Nordic part behaving badly with other 2.4GHz devices. It does some sort of frequency hopping to avoid this. And also, since it's bidirectional communication, you can have ACKs coming back to have a pretty bulletproof comm link.

Glenn

RE: Short range remote.

(OP)
Thanks for the link geek.

Any experience with how 2.4GHz will punch thru perhaps a wall, ceiling, and a roof?

Keith Cress
kcress - http://www.flaminsystems.com

RE: Short range remote.

itsmoked, a consortium with some of the major consumer electronic players has been formed to address wireless remote control. Some big semiconductor manufacturers are in there too.
It's based on IEEE 802.15.4 radio tech. (the ZigBee radio part):
http://www.rf4ce.org

Might be an opportunity for you to get a standard product?

Benta.

RE: Short range remote.

Forgot to mention:
Freescale is a player in RF4CE and has offered their protocol for this use.
Go to Freescale's website and search for "Synkro".

Benta.

RE: Short range remote.

"Any experience with how 2.4GHz will punch thru perhaps a wall, ceiling, and a roof?"

2.4 GHz is used with BlueTooth and WiFi, so your hands-on experience with these sorts of commercial products will indicate the range and performance you can expect. Obviously the antennas are a huge influence. But 30-feet should be easy, even with built-in sub-optimal antennas and a wall or two.

One thing to watch for is the requirement for leaving the link turned on (as opposed to instant on) and the effect of battery life and/or response time. But a BlueTooth headset for a mobile phone can last for days on a AAA battery.


 

RE: Short range remote.

Bluetooth is not a good choice, as it takes 3...8 seconds to synchronize to the network after being in sleep mode.
You remark is correct for the headset, but that's because it is running at extremely low power (=short range). The OP wants up to 30 m, which is a different story altogether.

An 802.15.4 radio is much better, it is synchronized within few tens of milliseconds after sleep, which is what you need in a remote control.

Benta.

RE: Short range remote.

My experience with the Nordic part is in a remote control for some consumer electronics. It seems to go through walls without a problem. We even tried putting the receiver in a metal filing cabinet and it still worked. I guess the gaps in the cabinet were pretty large for a 2.4GHz wave.  We didn't try through a ceiling or roof, although I expect that would work depending on the type of construction.

Glenn

RE: Short range remote.

Sick already invented this device

Sick ISD-300 is an infrared bi directional comm device that communicates over 600 ft.  used these on cranes

I have used Ethernet access points in transfer cars and cranes and this has been out for years.  This would be an off the shelf access point that communicates to a wireless switch in the ceiling.

Are you reinventing the wheel?  What is your niche market?

Reverse engineer other peoples stuff to get an idea and focus on an issue that has not been addressed.

wireless radio website  these can get through steel easier than ethernet access points.
http://www.data-linc.com/srmfamily/srm6000.htm

RE: Short range remote.

(OP)
Thanks controlsdude, but that that stuff looks way too industrial.  This is for a $300-ish product.

Keith Cress
kcress - http://www.flaminsystems.com

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources