×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Cooling Fans on MV Substation Transformers

Cooling Fans on MV Substation Transformers

Cooling Fans on MV Substation Transformers

(OP)
Is there any advantage gained by running the cooling fans on a distribution substation transformer that is normally loaded on peak to approximately 70% of the base rating? This particular unit has two stages of fan forced air cooling with ratings of 18/24/36 MVA respectively.  To my knowledge 17 MVA was the most ever put on this unit, and that was during a contingency.

RE: Cooling Fans on MV Substation Transformers

Cooler oil and cooler insulation lasts longer. Whether the extension in life is worthwhile against the increased maintenance costs and the increased overall losses from running the fans is arguable. Personally I would say 'no' on gut feel in the absence of any firm numbers to base the decision on.
  

----------------------------------
  
If we learn from our mistakes I'm getting a great education!
 

RE: Cooling Fans on MV Substation Transformers

I agree with Scotty.  The gain in life of operating a transformer at a lower than design temperature is not as much as the loss in life of operating above the design temperature.  I don't have any firm numbers to go on either, but if you look at the cost of running the fans full time, you may find it difficult to justify.
 

RE: Cooling Fans on MV Substation Transformers

Just put them in auto, best way to go unless you are having high temps (Which could be caused by blocked radiator tubes), then maybe forced air can be justified.  

RE: Cooling Fans on MV Substation Transformers

I had old rectifier transformers running above their original rating.  Our oil temperature measurements and the  winding resistance measurements indicated that the kW to run the fans was more than offset by the kW saved by the decrease in winding resistance.  We ran fans all of the time.  It would be unusual to find a more modern transformer pushed to those limits where the cooling has a direct beneficial effect on the losses.

One problem was the 64G protection was driven by a CT that connected the transformer case to ground.  The CT could not tell the difference between  13.8kV fault current and a 208V fan motor failure.  A 1/2 HP fan motor ground fault would trip the 50MW rectifer station.

As the other experts recommend - just run in auto.  

RE: Cooling Fans on MV Substation Transformers

This is  an interesting topic.First of all as per standards,there is a  relative gain in life when temperature falls down to the same extent as loss of life.As example,if winding hot spot temperature goes up by 8C more than  reference temperature of 98C,then rate of ageing goes up by 8 times.When temperature goes down by 8C ,ageing goes down by 1/8 times.(Table 2 of IEC 60076-7 Loading Guide for Transformers.)So theoretically,working at lower temperature will enhance the life of insulation.


But running the fan throughout ie during ON cooling  is not a very good idea.Rcwilson has  brought in a new angle.The drop in copper loss due to temp drop may off set the cooler power consumption.Actual checking on some trfs does not justify such a line.One thing-though I2R loss goes down with temperature,stray losses goes up with lower temperature.At ON rating of say 70%load, the copper loss will be only half at full load.For a temp drop of 10 C due to fans,the reduction in loss will be only  half of 3% of full load loss.In many cases cooler loss will be more than that saving.

A new trend is coming up-to use variable frequency drive for coolers ( some type of intelligent coolers)so that same oil temperature is amintained by changing the cooler speed to save energy.

Regarding 64 G Tank current protection.I have seen this only in France and other French influeced regions.But in such cases, it is a must that coolers,marshalling boxes and OLTC drive box  shall be kept insulated  from main tank and separately earthed to avoid mal operation of relay from auxiliary power break down to earth.So  it has to be assumed that the rectifier trnsformer cooler mounting  was not  designed correctly.

RE: Cooling Fans on MV Substation Transformers

Good comments, PRC.  Just to clarify on our use of fans.  These 7.5 MVA rectifier transformers were already used when they were installed at our facility in 1953.  They were built by Allis-Chalmers in the early 1940's. Fans were added during an upgrade around 1965 when the units were pushed to about 150% of their original design MVA, creating higher I2R losses. None of the transformers had failed or been rewound when the plant was shut down and scrapped in 1998.

It would be very unusual to find a modern transformer where the I2R losses would be as high.  

The 64G's main function was to detect winding faults on the low voltage(800V) side that would be back fed from the other 7 rectifer units via the DC negative bus.  A sister facility did have a LV winding failure and the 64G unit did clear the line quickly.  

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources