×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

why was this a cut out?

why was this a cut out?

why was this a cut out?

(OP)
I have a 20"condensate line that terminates in the main condensor of a 500mw steam turbine. The pipe is A106 sch 40 20". The wps calls for a gtaw root pass with Er70s-2 wire and smaw 7018 root, fill and cap.
The service temp and pressure are 50 psig and 350 deg F.
A hydrostatic test was required but could not be done due to isolation points in the line. Instead an mpi was done on the root pass and Rt on the remainder of the joint,the weld failed due to "suck back" on the root pass.
My question is instead of using an Rt procedure could not an mpi of the entire weld have been done instead? The condensate line met none of the requirements for Rt testing in service pressure, temp or wall thickness.
What is the limit of "suck back" allowed?
sftyvlv

RE: why was this a cut out?

MPI is not a good inspection tool for thick welds.  I really only locates cracks and surface discontinuities.

RT examines the whole weld a and looks for porosity, slag inclusions, lack of fusion and full penetration (suck back)

No suck back of lack of fusion is disireable

RE: why was this a cut out?

Quote:

My question is instead of using an Rt procedure could not an mpi of the entire weld have been done instead? The condensate line met none of the requirements for Rt testing in service pressure, temp or wall thickness.

Great question. In my opinion, the code of construction would be ASME B31.1, and using the requirements for NDT in Table 136.4,you are correct, the only requirement for NDT would have been only a VT based on a temperature at 350 deg F but your pressure is below 1025 psig.

Since someone wanted an RT, and you have no linear, crack-like indications and only suckback, you could attempt to disposition "as-is" or fit for service. There is really no obligation for RT at this pressure unless the owner specified it and contractually it must be done.
 

RE: why was this a cut out?

Forgot to mention, was the basis of rejection based on ASME B31.1, 136.4.5? If not, the rejection criteria should be based on (A.5).

RE: why was this a cut out?

(OP)
Yes this is to B31.1
Sftyvlv

RE: why was this a cut out?

sftyvlv;
Why was the RT selected for NDT? Was this the owners requirement or what?

RE: why was this a cut out?

Let's see, main condenser, condensate line, LSTG unit.  So far I'm OK.  Service temperature 50 PSIG and 350F?  What is wrong with this picture?  If this were an extraction drain line or a emergency vent line, I'd say maybe yes and especially to the temperature, but if this joint ever sees 50 PSIG, the condenser will have long since launched itself into the next county.  Why are the service conditions specified thusly?

Now, don't for one minute think I am minimizing the need for proper welds at the joints of terminations into the condenser.  I've repaired too many and beefed too many up beyond their original specification to do that.  The service conditions just raise a red flat with me.

rmw

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources