×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Dyno torque calibration

Dyno torque calibration

Dyno torque calibration

(OP)
I'm trying to determine the statistical uncertainty of an engine dynamometer's torque reading (load cells).  I've taken 120 randomized (target load value and order) data points (well normally distributed) over three separate time intervals to compare the "known" torque to the measured.  The current calibration is a two-point (zero and 17850 ft-lbs) and, thus is assuming linearity.  

My numbers show the linearity assumption to be good (slope 0.996, intercept may be zero) but my residuals of the linear regression show issues.  My residuals vs torque (both predicted and measured) show a sinusoidal pattern (like 1.5 periods of increasing harmonic motion) and the variance increases with torque.  The increase in variance is expected to be due to increased friction in the bearings/linkages as the load increases.  The waveform I can't explain.

The worst part is my cumulative probability diagram of the residuals shows a "knee" at about 25%.  This is supposed to indicate two distributions(?!)  The residuals in the knee region are made up of about 5 points near 10% of the torque range and the other 13 or so are from about 60% to 85% of the range. I can't predict uncertainty from the regression unless the distribution is normal (and, thus, due to random error(s)).

Any clue as to what's going on?  Do I have some systematic error?  I've randomized everything to remove any drift, temp/time effects and hysteresis I can think of.

I can post the charts tomorrow.

RE: Dyno torque calibration

(OP)
Oh yeah, and the chronological and lag plots of the residuals look good (scattered randomly).   

RE: Dyno torque calibration

I think you are confusing yourself with the math.
Load cells are very reliable, linear and repeatable.
If for some reason they are not it's usually a mechanical issue, not a mathmatical error.
Roy

RE: Dyno torque calibration

(OP)
I need to be able to quote a proper accuracy for this as in +/- 1% of measured value with 95% confidence;which, I think, wouldn't use a confidence interval, it would be a predication interval, because I haven't calibrated at exactly every possible torque value.  

I also need to ensure my total uncertainty, including the uncertainty of the calibration equipment, is less than +/- 2% of measured to be able to test the engines according to the manufacturer's standards, ISO 3046/1.

The math is very confusing though.  It seems like the more statistics I use, the more confusing and wrong the data seems.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources