×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Guyed tower turnbuckle design

Guyed tower turnbuckle design

Guyed tower turnbuckle design

(OP)
I'm checking calculations for turnbuckle selection, using LRFD (well, the Australian version of it).

Applied tension is therefore factored.

Turnbuckle capacity is in service load WLL (working load limit). WLL is 40% of proof load and 20% of ultimate strength.

The designer has shown that the applied tension is less than 80% of the ultimate strength, and is also less than the proof load, and is therefore adequate, he claims.

Surely this is incorrect? If we were using ASD we would expect a safety factor of 5 over the ultimate strength. Shouldn't we expect a similar overall safety factor for LRDF?

I would have converted the factored load to a service load by dividing by 1.5 and ensuring that this is less than the WLL. Does anyone agree with my approach?
 

RE: Guyed tower turnbuckle design

I think you need to figure out the authority and governing code for design of guyed tower components, and find out the approved design method(s).

RE: Guyed tower turnbuckle design

I agree with you Apsix.

Turnbuckles and other components for cable systems use different safety factors to find maximum service load from ultimate strength. 5 is a very common one for turnbuckles, shackles and other components. This higher safety factor is due to abuse, installation issues, fatigue, repeated use of the equipment and other factors.

I think it is incorrect to assume you can use a lower safety factor. Working load should not exceed the maximum working load specified by manufacturer, and I find strange that any engineer would take that responsibility on his or her soulders.

RE: Guyed tower turnbuckle design

I agree with previous post. First define the governing code or criteria.  However, having said that I know some of the ASME B30 codes for lifting devices call for a FS of 5 against yield and 3 against ultimate strength.

RE: Guyed tower turnbuckle design

apsix
A factor of safety of 3 (breaking strength/working load) is a resonable number for wire rope used for a guy supported structures.
The turnbuckle and all the rope hardware should have atleast the same capacity as the rope.

RE: Guyed tower turnbuckle design

(OP)
Thanks to all you replied.

I've recommended using the next size up where the WLL is exceeded.
The cost of a dozen larger turnbuckles is insignificant, and worth the peace of mind.

There was no guidance in the tower design code (AS3995).

RE: Guyed tower turnbuckle design

Just a caution with regard to using ultimate strength design for turnbuckles, turnbuckles are forged and do not have the yield characteristics expected in ultimate strength design.  I checked with CSA Canadian Standards Association a few years ago and they do not have a standard for structural strength or specifications of these types of components.  

I have used Crosby versus Korean and Chinese products as the later have a track record of failures.  Every time I asked for mill certificates from Korea and China, material quality is questionable.

HTH

VOD

RE: Guyed tower turnbuckle design

Ref AS1418, guy ropes etc, for a given classification, a Zp / SF is provided.

I would have thought your proposed approach would be most technically correct. As was mentioned before, why take the risk on your their own shoulders?
Engineers generally work to established standards.

Regards,
Lyle
  

RE: Guyed tower turnbuckle design

aspix

I take it the 'next size up' is higher grade turnbuckle? This was encountered recently in my office and we were unable to source a practical turnbuckle with the same WWL (and diameter)as the threaded rod (due to the vastly different SF). Due to this lack of WWL correlation for a given rod and turnbuckle diameter we were forced to fabricate the component with a high strength coupler and plates.

It is certainly odd that manufacturer's cannot provide ultimate capacities and let engineers determine the appropriate safety factors to apply. It is my understanding that this is the whole intent of limit state design anyway.

  

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources