Smart questions
Smart answers
Smart people
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Member Login

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips now!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

Join Eng-Tips
*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

LINK TO THIS FORUM!

Add Stickiness To Your Site By Linking To This Professionally Managed Technical Forum.
Just copy and paste the
code below into your site.

Partner With Us!

"Best Of Breed" Forums Add Stickiness To Your Site
Partner Button
(Download This Button Today!)

Feedback

"...One of the best run forums I have used in years! ...I like the way the site is organized and your no tolerance of flames..."

Geography

Where in the world do Eng-Tips members come from?
greauxpete (Mechanical)
11 Sep 08 19:40
Hello,

 

I was wondering if you someone could help with a design issue I am having with TU8x8x3/16.

The tube is classified as a "Slender" tube due to the high b/t ratio when compared to values in the AISC Manual 8th and 9th edition. I have figured it out in the 13th edition (its more straight forward but would like to compare side by side)

 

As a result, the AISC specification requires that the effective width (beff) be calculated and then
from the effective width calculate the effective section modulus (See attached spreadsheet).

The problem I am having is, the calculated effective width (beff), is larger than both the actual width, (bactual)

and the AISCM requires that the effective width (beff) be smaller than the actual width (bactual).

Am I comparing the effective width to the correct width? Should I be comparing the effective width

to the actual width (bactual) or the design width (bdesign = bactual – 3t)?

 

I have attached a spreadsheet with the comments/ question marked up in red.

 

I would appreciate any help/guidance you can provide.

 
 
greauxpete (Mechanical)
11 Sep 08 19:43
cap4000 (Civil/Environmental)
26 Sep 08 8:12
I have the out of print AISC 1997 HSS Connections Manual. It uses b/t < 35 with Fy = 46ksi. The b is called the flat width and the t design = 0.93t. The t is the nonmial thickness of the tube.  

I calculate your b/t = 42.87 and not 39.667 as you have. You have a slender element but I think the 13edition Manual now uses 40 as the limit. I don't have the 13th edition.

Due to the tube thickness varying during fabrication AISC takes an average 7% reduction for the design t value. Thus the 0.93t value is the design t.

You are missing the 0.93 factor in both the denominator and numerator. Be very carefull !!!
 

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close