×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Why the debond length?

Why the debond length?

Why the debond length?

(OP)
When specifying anchoring into rock, or similarly with soil nailing, you always see a purposefully debonded length... Other than causing a predictable location for yielding, what is the purpose of this debonded length?

I'm sure I've seen this discussed, or heard the reasoning before, but I just can't think of the reason...

Must be a Monday; But it's TUESDAY here!!!

Thanks in advance,

YS

B.Eng (Carleton)
Working in New Zealand, thinking of my snow covered home...

RE: Why the debond length?

Rock anchors are usually post-tensioned.  The debonded length allows the strand to be tensioned over a sufficient length to give enough elongation to more than overcome anchorage set and other losses.

Monday's a holiday in Canada so Tuesday's Monday ... or something like that.

RE: Why the debond length?

YS,

Soil nails are not usually tensioned to my knowledge, so don't require a debonded length.

Ground anchors (rock anchors or soil anchors) are tensioned against a bonded length of anchor at the bottom.  If you bonded the whole thing before stressing, the anchorage would be close to the surface, and that is not what you want.

RE: Why the debond length?

(OP)
Thanks for the advice;  I'm not sure that I really need a debond length, as I am simply employing reinforcing bar grouted into bedrock as anchor bolts.

I can see the value in bonding deeper into the rock if my loads were higher, but I from the capacity charts I have for the product involved, I only have to grout 1.2m to get the strength required.  The product literature recomends a minimum grouted length of 3m, so that is what I will specify, and although I'm certainly leaning towards providing a 600mm debonded length, I would rather eliminate if possible to reduce the total required drilling.

Would you think it necessary to debond a length for a case where we're just trying to get anchor bolts to develop in rock rather than concrete?  Still not 100% clear I will require the debond length, but see the need/logic for many similar situations.

Cheers,

YS

B.Eng (Carleton)
Working in New Zealand, thinking of my snow covered home...

RE: Why the debond length?

There is no reason to debond if you are not tensioning the bars.

RE: Why the debond length?

From 'Foundation Design and Construction' by  M.J. Tomlinson;
"Progressive failure of the grout to rock bond due to stretch of the anchor is prevented by sheathing the upper part..."
I don't think stretch would be significant for a 1200 long anchor.
 

RE: Why the debond length?

Even if the grout bond did fail near the surface, I don't think that would differ much strengthwise from a debonded section, but corrosion protection could be a concern in some environments.

RE: Why the debond length?

(OP)
I'm using hot-dipped galvanized bars due to exposure, so I'm not too stressed by the idea of debonded grout permitting moisture access.

Thanks all, I'm satisfied I know where to go with this one.

Cheers,

YS

B.Eng (Carleton)
Working in New Zealand, thinking of my snow covered home...

RE: Why the debond length?

If you are using inclined anchors to resisist lateral load then the anchors need to be debonded over the zone through wich failure of the soil/ rock mass is anticipated. For vertical anchors it is still a good idea to have a debonded zone as the top of rock is somtimes not well defined, esp. in residual soils, or is often fractured or punky. The objective is to have 100% of your desired ultimate capacity developed in solid non yielding rock. This may not be true for a portion of the top of the rock.

RE: Why the debond length?

On a recent project that we used rock anchors, the soil consultant suggested the following:
1- the capacity of the rock anchor is the least of a) the tensile capacity of the steel, b) the skin friction capacity between grout and rock, and c) the mass of a cone of rock that counteracts tension considering the group effects and the submerged unit weight of rock if UGW is higher than rock.
2- 10% of the anchors be tested for 130% of their design capacity.
The depth of the anchor was governed by the weight of the cone of rock.
As to bond or debond the upper part, it depends on the applicaiton. You definitly need to debond the anchor so that you can pretension it if you are anchoring the footing of a retaining wall for example.  

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources