×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Magnetizing reactance of Instrument transformer

Magnetizing reactance of Instrument transformer

Magnetizing reactance of Instrument transformer

(OP)

Hi,

I would appreciate some insight in to some conceptual issue in regards to an equivalent circuit of Current transformer and Voltage tansformer and a regular tranformer.  I am not sure, why I ended up having this confusion but after searching books like Blackburn on issue of CT/PT, I could not find the answer.

Q#1. Why a magnetizing reactance in case of equivalent circuit of a Potential transformer is neglected and saturation is not much of an issue in case of PT.

Q#2  Why this magnatizing reactance in considered in case of  a CT equivalent circuit.

I would appreciate a word.

Thanks
 

RE: Magnetizing reactance of Instrument transformer

CT primary is in series with load and fault current.  VT primary is parallel to load or fault voltage.  Makes all the difference in the world.

RE: Magnetizing reactance of Instrument transformer

(OP)
I am sure this is the right answer David. I got the first one but pardon my ignorance I got no clue about the second line about PT. Would you please elaborate.

Thanks

RE: Magnetizing reactance of Instrument transformer

No current to speak of through the VT.  Secondary voltage of VT rarely exceeds rated; secondary of CT ranges all over the place.

RE: Magnetizing reactance of Instrument transformer

The voltage on a system rarely exceeds rated voltage. Under fault conditions the voltage generally drops.
There are exceptions. On a high resistance grounded system the voltage to ground and the voltage applied to the ground detection potential transformers will rise by a factor of 1.73, but these systems are readily identifiable and the PTs are rated for the maximum voltage that they may see.
Saturation under fault conditions is not expected.
As David points out, CTs must carry fault currents. These currents may be many times normal rated currents and saturation of the CT cores is an ever present issue.  

Bill
--------------------
"Why not the best?"
Jimmy Carter

RE: Magnetizing reactance of Instrument transformer

I will try to answer directly original questions.

Basic difference is in their purpose and connection to power system.
VT will be connected in parallel, and thus always see voltage of the system (rated and maximum expected, defined by voltage factor – 1,5 or 1,9). Current through VT primary winding will be small, caused by its magnetizing current and load, which is relatively small (up to 200 VA).
CT is connected in series in power system, carrying rated and fault currents and transmitting them to secondary winding in expected ratio.
Purpose of instrument transformer is to give accurate image of primary voltage or current to secondary winding and circuit. Therefore, their error must be minimum.
CT and VT have same equivalent diagram as power transformer. Difference is in value and significance of its elements.
Error of VT is caused by horizontal branch of equivalent diagram, because VT load created current which makes voltage drop on those elements. Magnetizing branch (vertical branch) is fed by power system and does not influence secondary voltage. At least not directly. Magnetizing current creates additional voltage drop on primary winding resistance and leakage inductance. Mentioned voltage drops create voltage error and must be minimized in VT.
So, answer No.1: error in VT is generated by equivalent diagram horizontal branch. Saturation of VT is not an issue because it is designed not to be saturated at all voltages expected and defined by power system (defined b voltage factor).

In CT, situation is opposite. Current through primary winding is defined by power system. Current error is caused by magnetizing branch (part of primary current goes to magnetizing branch instead to secondary winding). Burden connected to secondary winding defines voltage which needs to be induced in magnetizing branch and thus current required for magnetizing. When voltage or current of magnetizing branch reaches saturation (excessive burden or excessive primary current), transformation ratio of CT changes - its error increases significally, because magnetizing current increases significally.

Answer No. 2: Magnetizing characteristic of CT defines its accuracy – current error, as well as important CT values – Accuracy limiting factor for protection CT, and instrument security factor for measuring CT. Both are caused and controlled by CT saturation. Explanation and details you can find in any power system engineering handbook or relevant CT standard - IEC 60044-1.

Note: I am from IEC world and definitions I mentioned refer to IEC practice. US/IEEE world has its own definitions of same items.

Sorry for long answer, hope you find it helpful helpful. Check literature for details and drawings, much easier to understand.
 

RE: Magnetizing reactance of Instrument transformer

(OP)
Thanks a lot Kdanijel. It was very useful.
Regards'

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources