Cincinnati vs Mazak
Cincinnati vs Mazak
(OP)
I am thinking about purchasing a Cincinnati CL-6 2500 watt laser with a dual-pallet 10' X 5' bed. I was wondering if anyone had experience with Cincinnati lasers and could tell me any praises or problems with them.
We currently have a Mazak STX-510 and are not happy with Mazak policies concerning purchasing parts. Mazak is making it very difficult to purchase anything from them that goes in the resonator cabinet or anything that has to do with high voltage.
We currently have a Mazak STX-510 and are not happy with Mazak policies concerning purchasing parts. Mazak is making it very difficult to purchase anything from them that goes in the resonator cabinet or anything that has to do with high voltage.
Gary L. Ellis Jr.
Quality Steel Fabrication
Sidney, OH
gellis@woh.rr.com





RE: Cincinnati vs Mazak
RE: Cincinnati vs Mazak
We are actually now in a dilemma between purchasing a Mitsubishi or a Cincinnati. I am very impressed with the cross-flow resonator on the Mitsubishi and the minimal maintenance. On the other hand, Cincinnati's price is much better.
Gary L. Ellis Jr.
Quality Steel Fabrication
Sidney, OH
gellis@woh.rr.com
RE: Cincinnati vs Mazak
BAM14 - how long have you had the machines you have and did you get them used?.
RE: Cincinnati vs Mazak
I do like the crossflow resonator in the Mits, that doesn't have an expensive booster, but I have not heard enough about it to make a decision for it. Their machine has quite a bit more moving parts and I also don't know enough about their rack-and-pinion movement vs. a ballscrew drive which is tried and true (for the most part).
Gary L. Ellis Jr.
Quality Steel Fabrication
Sidney, OH
gellis@woh.rr.com