×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Comparison of stacked washers vs single washer in assembly.

Comparison of stacked washers vs single washer in assembly.

Comparison of stacked washers vs single washer in assembly.

(OP)
Will two 1/8 thick flat washers 2-1/2" OD x 17/32" ID stacked one on top of the other and used in an assembly perform closer to one 3/16" thick washer or closer to one 1/4" thick washer in ablility to resist cupping deformation during bolt tensioning?  My application is mounting a coach built body (1800#) on a truck chassis in 12 places.  Fastener is a 1/2"-13 x 2-1/2" Lg fully threaded Gr 5 flange head bolt with Gr 5 flange lock nut.  At each body mount location the body structure consists of double thickness of 10ga sheetmetal.  The flat washers would be stacked one on top of the other with the bolt passing through the two washers and the body assembly, then through a 1/2" thick rubber pad between the body assembly and the 1/4" truck chassis upper C shape flange, a 1/4" thick rubber pad on the opposite side of the chassis upper C flange and then a 1/4" thick mild steel plate with the locknut on the bottom.  The mount is very compliant, bolt is torqued to 55 lb-ft preload.  Under live testing two 1/8" thick washers yielded and cupped very slightly (.020" from flat).  The question is: would this result influence you to go toward the 1/4" thick single washer or toward the 3/16" thick single washer?  Putting it another way, did the stacked 1/8" washers perform equal to, less than, or slightly better than a 3/16" washer will,... or more closely to how a single 1/4" thick washer will?  Consider that no more testing is allowed.  Should I recommend the single 3/16" or the single 1/4" thick washer to replace the two 1/8 washers?   

RE: Comparison of stacked washers vs single washer in assembly.

I would expect closer to SQRT(0.125^2+0.125^2)

RE: Comparison of stacked washers vs single washer in assembly.

A single washer is better for multiple reasons, and taller washers usually are better.  So, go for a single 1/4" thick one.

Regards,

Cory

Please see FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips Fora.

RE: Comparison of stacked washers vs single washer in assembly.

Hi 19Deuce32

A sketch of your joint may help, but some further questions:-

1 why does the joint need to be torqued to 55lb/ft which is
  the maximum torque for an unlubricated joint.

2 are you assembling the joint without lubrication

3 Why are you using plain washers with bolts and nuts which
  have flanges already.

Normally with flanged fixings the plain washers can be dispensed with.
The site:- Bolt Science recommend not using multiple plain washers as relative movement can be transferred from nut/bearing face to washer/bearing face which can effect
friction within the joint and ultimately the final pre-load.

Have a look at this site it also contains a link to the Bolt science page I mentioned earlier.

http://www.roymech.co.uk/Useful_Tables/Screws/index_screws.htm

Regards

desertfox

RE: Comparison of stacked washers vs single washer in assembly.

Hi Again

Sorry your torque figure is for lubricated bolts so are you lubricating the bolts and what with.

desertfox

RE: Comparison of stacked washers vs single washer in assembly.

(OP)
desertfox,
I have uploaded this file to ENGINEERING.com "Body Mount.bmp" generated from AutoCad, hope it is visible.

1) Torque setting has not been altered during production of this body, the rubber pads make the assembly generally compliant.  Although this is not an OEM rebound mount for traditional body on frame installations, we are trying to replicate that style of assembly using the rubber pads on either side of the frame.  Space is the limiting factor.  55 lb-ft is the value for the bolt torque we thought produced the necessary compression in the rubber to get the joint to resist bounce.  The rubber pads are cut from thick conveyor belt with fabric carcass and rubber both sides.  The 2-1/2" OD washer under the head of the bolt is an idea to seal off a 17/32 x 1.25 Lg slot in the body structure where the bolt passes through.  The slot is offset in the body mount hat shape to allow for left and right commonality in the weld assembly.  The flange on the bolt head will not alone cover the slot, and water/salt will fill the cavity surrounding the bolt. We have had some instances of rust corrosion on the bolt leading to bolt fatigue failure.  So there is an current production issue as well as a field retrofit issue.  I would like to go to a Gr8 bolt to provide more endurance strength.  That may allow us to raise the pretension on the bolt with the Gr8 but with the compliant body mount I think that the load will just add to the pretension and load the bolt further. So the 55 lb-ft torque may be used with a Gr8 if we go that way.  The design of the mount in general may need to be stiffer to take full advantage of the Gr8 with a higher pretension.  However, maybe even as it is now at 55 lb-ft it would be an improvement over the Gr5 bolt?  Price doubles to $2 each on each Gr8 bolt vs the Gr5 at $1 each for 12 mounts total.  Dacromet coating on a plain Gr8 bolt is about 65 cents/lb of bolts, on top of about $1 per bolt and might be an improvement over the Zn which does not stand up well in service.  Some are advocating Zn Chromate (yellow) over Zn but I am not certain that would be much of an improvement over the current Zn.  The bolt is fully threaded and currently has serrations under the head. The bolt is used in other locations on the machine so it will still be a stocked part regardless of the outcome of this issue.
  
2) Fasteners are Zn electro plated, no lubrication under fastener heads or on threads.

3) The idea of the large 2-1/2" OD flat washer is to "seal" off the cavity around the bolt.  Up to now we have been installing the assembly without any washer under the flange head bolt, however we have experienced corrosion induced fatigue failure on some units in the north east.  That is why I am interested in not having the washer cup during installation.  A cupped washer would allow water to migrate easily into the slot and the cavity.  I think the washer needs to be stiff and flat against the body mount hat shape.  So far a single 1/8" thick washer cupped severely, so they were doubled to get a "feel" for which direction to go and as previously mentioned the two stacked 1/8 washers cupped .020".  I never advocated the installation of two washers stacked, that was just to get a "feel" for which direction to go.  The 3/16" and the 1/4" will be a special order large quantity purchase.  So far I have made the recommendation to go with 1/4" thick and have been stopped by production who says I should have recommended a 3/16" thick washer.  As of today I have not been able to laser cut some washers from 3/16" (7 Ga) or 1/4" plate to test and verify who is correct.  So the crux of the situation: who has the better direction on the issue? Would a 3/16" single washer have shown to be stiffer (not cup) than the two 1/8" stacked washers, or did the 1/8" washers perform similar or even better than a 3/16" washer would have provided it would have been also tested?  Meaning the 1/8" stacked washers performed almost as good as a 1/4" washer will?  I thought that the binding friction between the two 1/8" washers as they slipped against each other during tensioning would make them react similar to a 1/4" washer due to the high compression in the joint.  So I recommended the 1/4" washer after examination of the 1/8" stacked washers showed .020" cupping. The flange head bolt was our standard bolt and I thought that keeping it would provide additional radius of contact for the pressure distribution zone under the bolt head and then under any flat washer used.  This recommendation was made with the thought also that I might need to go to a Gr8 bolt and a higher pretension, so the stiffer the washer the better was my opinion.  Lots of issues in this discussion.
 

RE: Comparison of stacked washers vs single washer in assembly.

Was the deformation of the two 1/8 inch washers acceptable that whoever would consider 3/16 thick acceptable?

Use one 1/4 inch thick washer.

Ted

RE: Comparison of stacked washers vs single washer in assembly.

I concur with hydtools your best bet is with the 1/4" thick material. The rubber washer makes any relative movement mute. I would definately use a thread lock compound on the joint as you will never keep any preload on the joint.

RE: Comparison of stacked washers vs single washer in assembly.

Hi again

Thanks for the info.
I concur that a single washer is better than two, however I think your joint needs looking at from a design point of view, I am not convinced that just placing washers under the bolt head is the end of the problem.
At work now so I,ll post later.

desertfox

RE: Comparison of stacked washers vs single washer in assembly.

Hi again

You can go upto 75lbs-ft on your bolt without lubricate although that won't help the washers.
Assemblying the joints without lubricant will give a very large spread of clamping force or pre-load particularly if your only using a torque wrench. It maybe worthwhile using a better method for setting pre-load and using lubricant to reduce friction within the joint (see site I posted yesterday).
In addition by adding the washers you are altering the stiffness of the clamped components see the Roy Mech site under "Bolt Preload". Your drawing doesn't show how thick body structure or chassis components are within the bolt clamping range. I would check with your rubber pad supplier
what pre-load is recommended and also re-analyse the joint taking into account the external forces on the joint.

Regards

desertfox

RE: Comparison of stacked washers vs single washer in assembly.

19deuce32, instead of having a few 1/4" thk washers made, just grind the corners off a few 1/4" square plates you currently use.

To prevent water intrusion use a Permatex sealant under the washer.

Ted

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources